International law and regional security: the case of the South China Sea dispute
Keywords:
South China Sea dispute, Southeast Asia, ASEAN, International Political Economy, International LawAbstract
The article aims to examine the relationship between the South China Sea dispute and the security of the Southeast Asia region. The authors apply the concept of international political economy compounded with the theories of international law to construct the conceptual framework of the paper. The article ultimately seeks to assess cumulative effects of the aforesaid dispute on the security of the Southeast Asia region and hoe relevant policies should be planned by ASEAN.
References
1. จันตรี สินศุภฤกษ์, กฎหมายระหว่างประเทศ (กรุงเทพฯ: นิติธรรม, 2560), หน้า 218.
2. Library Special, South China Sea Territorial Dispute. 2020. (Online) Available from: https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/library-special/south-china-sea-territorial-disputes/ [2020, June 11]
3. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (adopted 10 December 1982 entered into force 19 November 1994) UNCLOS, art 57
4. จันตรี สินศุภฤกษ์, “กรณีพิพาทหมู่เกาะสแปรตลีย์: ทัศนะทางกฎหมายและการเมือง,” จุลสารความมั่นคงศึกษา (ฉบับที่ 127-128)กรกฎาคม – สิงหาคม 2556: หน้า 1
5. มณฑล ยศสมศักดิ์. “การขยายบทบาททางการทหารของจีนในทะเลจีนใต้”. จุลสารความมั่นคงศึกษา (ฉบับที่ 132-133), พฤศจิกายน 2556” หน้า 20
6. Council on Foreign Relations, Territorial Dispute in the South China Sea. 2020. Available from: https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea [2020, June 11]
7. จันตรี สินศุภฤกษ์, “กรณีพิพาทหมู่เกาะสแปรตลีย์: ทัศนะทางกฎหมายและการเมือง,” จุลสารความมั่นคงศึกษา (ฉบับที่ 127-128),กรกฎาคม – สิงหาคม 2556: หน้า 2
8. Glaser, B. 2015. Contingency Planning Memorandum Update: Conflict in the South China Sea. Council on Foreign Relations. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05645. [2020, June 13]
9. Medina P. C. 2017. Legal Victory for the Philippines against China: A Case Study. Available from: https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/1/legal-victory-for-the-philippines-against-china-a-case-study/ [2020, June 13] In re Arbitration Between the Republic of the Philippines and the People's Republic of China, PCA Case No. 2013-19, Philippines Memorial, Vol. III, Annex 1 (Jan. 22, 2013)CJe ober“VII, art. 11.he disputee arbitration,d the legal status of insular features in the South China Sea.CJe ober“VII, art. 11.he disputee arbitration,d the legal status of insular features in the South China Sea. [hereinafter Philippines Memorial], Available from : https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%201-60%29.pdf [2020, June 13]
10. Position Paper on the Matter of Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration Initiated by the Republic of the Philippines, Ministry of Foreign Aff. People’s Republic of China (Dec. 7, 2014). Available from: www.fmprc.gov.cn/nanhai/eng/snhwtlcwj_1/t1368899.htm. [2020, June 13]
11. Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2016, July 12). The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) [Press release]. Retrieve from https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf
12. In re Arbitration Between the Republic of the Philippines and the People's Republic of China, PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award (July 12, 2016), Available from: https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Award.pdf [2020, June 14]
13. Rapp-Hooper, M. (2016). Parting the South China Sea: How to Uphold the Rule of Law. Foreign Affairs, 95(5), 76-82. Retrieved June 14, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43946958
14. Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. (2001). The Nature of Political Economy. In Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (pp. 25-45). PRINCETON; OXFORD: Princeton University Press. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcm4j53.6 [2020, June 15]
15. Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. (2001). The Study of International Political Economy. In Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (pp. 77-102). PRINCETON; OXFORD: Princeton University Press. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcm4j53.8. [2020, June 15]
16. Katzenstein, P., Keohane, R., & Krasner, S. (1998). International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization, 52(4), 645-685. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/2601354 [2020, June 15]
17. ASEAN Secretariat (2019). ASEAN Integration Report 2019. Jakarta. ASEAN Secretariat. Available from: https://asean.org/storage/2019/11/ASEAN-integration-report-2019.pdf [2020, June 15]
18. Panda A, China Condemns US FONOP Near Mischief Reef in the South China Sea [Online]. Available from : https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/china-condemns-us-fonop-near-mischief-reef-in-the-south-china-sea/ [2020, June 15]
2. Library Special, South China Sea Territorial Dispute. 2020. (Online) Available from: https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/library-special/south-china-sea-territorial-disputes/ [2020, June 11]
3. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (adopted 10 December 1982 entered into force 19 November 1994) UNCLOS, art 57
4. จันตรี สินศุภฤกษ์, “กรณีพิพาทหมู่เกาะสแปรตลีย์: ทัศนะทางกฎหมายและการเมือง,” จุลสารความมั่นคงศึกษา (ฉบับที่ 127-128)กรกฎาคม – สิงหาคม 2556: หน้า 1
5. มณฑล ยศสมศักดิ์. “การขยายบทบาททางการทหารของจีนในทะเลจีนใต้”. จุลสารความมั่นคงศึกษา (ฉบับที่ 132-133), พฤศจิกายน 2556” หน้า 20
6. Council on Foreign Relations, Territorial Dispute in the South China Sea. 2020. Available from: https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea [2020, June 11]
7. จันตรี สินศุภฤกษ์, “กรณีพิพาทหมู่เกาะสแปรตลีย์: ทัศนะทางกฎหมายและการเมือง,” จุลสารความมั่นคงศึกษา (ฉบับที่ 127-128),กรกฎาคม – สิงหาคม 2556: หน้า 2
8. Glaser, B. 2015. Contingency Planning Memorandum Update: Conflict in the South China Sea. Council on Foreign Relations. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05645. [2020, June 13]
9. Medina P. C. 2017. Legal Victory for the Philippines against China: A Case Study. Available from: https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/1/legal-victory-for-the-philippines-against-china-a-case-study/ [2020, June 13] In re Arbitration Between the Republic of the Philippines and the People's Republic of China, PCA Case No. 2013-19, Philippines Memorial, Vol. III, Annex 1 (Jan. 22, 2013)CJe ober“VII, art. 11.he disputee arbitration,d the legal status of insular features in the South China Sea.CJe ober“VII, art. 11.he disputee arbitration,d the legal status of insular features in the South China Sea. [hereinafter Philippines Memorial], Available from : https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%201-60%29.pdf [2020, June 13]
10. Position Paper on the Matter of Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration Initiated by the Republic of the Philippines, Ministry of Foreign Aff. People’s Republic of China (Dec. 7, 2014). Available from: www.fmprc.gov.cn/nanhai/eng/snhwtlcwj_1/t1368899.htm. [2020, June 13]
11. Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2016, July 12). The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) [Press release]. Retrieve from https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf
12. In re Arbitration Between the Republic of the Philippines and the People's Republic of China, PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award (July 12, 2016), Available from: https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Award.pdf [2020, June 14]
13. Rapp-Hooper, M. (2016). Parting the South China Sea: How to Uphold the Rule of Law. Foreign Affairs, 95(5), 76-82. Retrieved June 14, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43946958
14. Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. (2001). The Nature of Political Economy. In Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (pp. 25-45). PRINCETON; OXFORD: Princeton University Press. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcm4j53.6 [2020, June 15]
15. Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. (2001). The Study of International Political Economy. In Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (pp. 77-102). PRINCETON; OXFORD: Princeton University Press. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcm4j53.8. [2020, June 15]
16. Katzenstein, P., Keohane, R., & Krasner, S. (1998). International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization, 52(4), 645-685. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/2601354 [2020, June 15]
17. ASEAN Secretariat (2019). ASEAN Integration Report 2019. Jakarta. ASEAN Secretariat. Available from: https://asean.org/storage/2019/11/ASEAN-integration-report-2019.pdf [2020, June 15]
18. Panda A, China Condemns US FONOP Near Mischief Reef in the South China Sea [Online]. Available from : https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/china-condemns-us-fonop-near-mischief-reef-in-the-south-china-sea/ [2020, June 15]
Downloads
Published
2021-09-29
How to Cite
Melaneekhul, S. (2021). International law and regional security: the case of the South China Sea dispute. Nitiparitat Journal, 1(3). retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NitiPariJ/article/view/250011
Issue
Section
Academic Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2021 สุนีย์ เมลานีกุล
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The manuscript is original, does not contain plagiarism, and does not infringe any copyright.
