The Evaluation of Master Program in Educational Administration Muban Chom Bueng Rajabhat University

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to; 1) evaluate the Master Program in Educational Administration (Revised Curriculum Academic Year 2017) of Muban Chom Bueng Rajabhat University using the CIPPiest Model of Stufflebeam & Zhang. The sample consisted of 76 informers, including the curriculum administration committee, instructors, alumni, students, and stakeholders using stratified random sampling techniques. The instrument was a five rating scale questionnaire. The content validity of the questionnaire was .93. The statistics for data analysis were percentage, mean, and standard deviation.

The research findings were as follows:

The context evaluation overall was at a high level.  When considering each area, it was found that the program's purpose was at the highest level. Other areas were at a high level. The most to the least areas were listed as follows; curriculum structure and course outline. The inputs evaluation was overall, and each area was at a high level.  The average means were as follows: students' readiness and suitability, factors contributing to learning and teaching, availability, and suitability of instructors. The process evaluation overall and each area were at a high level. The most to the least areas were listed as follows; curriculum management and teaching and learning management. The product evaluation overall and each area were at a high level. Ranking from high to low means: knowledge, cognitive skills, numerical analysis skills, communication and information technology, interpersonal skills and responsibility, moral and ethics.

The impact evaluation overall and each area were at a high level.

The effectiveness evaluation overall and each area was at the highest level.

The sustainability evaluation overall and each area was at a high level.

The transportability evaluation overall and each area was at a high leve