https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/issue/feedThoughts2026-06-23T11:26:19+07:00Sani Chartudomdejchulathoughts@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<div class="page" title="Page 1"> <p><strong>Welcome to </strong><strong><em>Thoughts</em></strong><strong><em><br /></em></strong><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Thoughts</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Department of English. We are proud to carry forward a tradition of fostering academic inquiry in English language, literature, and translation studies.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Our journal serves as a space for meaningful scholarly exchange, encouraging research that explores the richness of language and the complexities of human experience. In a rapidly changing world, </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Thoughts</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> remains committed to highlighting the enduring relevance of the humanities.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We welcome submissions in English linguistics, applied linguistics, second language acquisition, literary studies, film studies, and translation theory and practice. We particularly value research that introduces new perspectives, deepens existing debates, or opens up dialogue across disciplines. All submissions are peer-reviewed by experts to ensure the highest academic standards.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We invite scholars, researchers, and students to share their work with us and become part of our growing academic community. We look forward to your contributions.</span></p> <p><strong> Journal Abbreviation: THTS</strong></p> <p><strong style="font-size: 0.875rem;"> Online ISSN: <strong>2586-906X </strong></strong></p> <p><strong style="font-size: 0.875rem;"> Print ISSN: </strong><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;">1513-1025</span><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> Start Year: 1981</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> Language: English</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> Issues per Year: 2 (January-June, July-December)</span></p> </div>https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/289262The Failure of Animal Symbolisation in the Plantationocene of “The Adventure of the Crooked Man” (1893) by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle2025-10-22T19:22:27+07:00Ming Panhalitwritcrit@gmail.com<p>This paper argues that “The Adventure of the Crooked Man” (1893) by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle uses animal symbolism, especially of snakes, birds and mongooses, to express hopes and fears at the time of British imperial decline, concerning the public memory of the Sepoy rebellion in 1857. However, the short story’s attempt to use the mongoose to support imperial authority symbolically fails, as the mongoose plays two contradictory roles, as the hero against snake-like rebels and as the unsuccessful attacker of a caged canary, which popularly symbolised Victorian women. Furthermore, reading the mongoose symbol in the context of colonial plantations, this paper argues that the commodification of the mongoose to perpetuate colonial power disrupts the colonial symbolisation of the mongoose in both aspects and exposes the British Empire as the origin of racist and anthropocentric violence. <br /><br /></p>2026-06-23T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/291666Representation of Anti-Feminine Mental Habits in George Eliot’s The Mill on the Floss2026-01-31T18:13:59+07:00Chayanin Nuamphummarinchayanin.cnr@gmail.com<p>This article situates <em>The Mill on the Floss</em> (1860) in nineteenth-century theories of the mind, particularly the implications of psychological theories of habit on gender. Significantly, “anti-feminine mental habits,” the term I have coined here, refer to mental habits in female protagonists that contradict the psychological writings of major nineteenth-century psychologists, who typically assigned to women traits that served to degrade them while elevating the status of men as the superior sex. In fact, William James, Herbert Spencer and Henry Maudsley—all major figures in nineteenth-century psychology—agreed that women were more susceptible to mechanical thoughts and actions than men, contributing to the prevailing binary opposition that pitted feminine mental weaknesses against masculine mental powers. Additionally, mental habits that were considered feminine all placed women far below men in terms of free-thought, free will and originality. I argue that, in an attempt to rewrite misogynistic nineteenth-century physiological psychology and refute prominent evolutionary theories proposed by major mental scientists, George Eliot created a female protagonist in <em>The Mill on the Floss</em> who possesses superior mental habits, namely a spirit of enquiry, independence of mind, and suspense of judgement (as opposed to hurried judgement).</p>2026-06-23T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/288929Words and Ways in Digital Life Coaching: An Analysis of Rhetorical Devices and Multimodal Resources in Instagram Content2026-02-10T15:12:09+07:00Songwut Bhattarachaiyakornsongwut.b@ubu.ac.th<p>The research aimed to investigate the rhetorical devices and multimodal resources used by the Instagram influencer ‘Jay Shetty’, particularly within the context of life coaching. Using a purposive sampling technique, the researcher gathered 36 posts from Jay Shetty’s verified Instagram account between 2022 and 2023. Moreover, Harris’s (2018) framework and the multimodal approach by Kress and van Leeuwen (2001) were employed to investigate rhetorical devices and multimodal resources in his Instagram life-coaching posts. The findings revealed that Shetty predominantly employed figurative language and balancing strategies and incorporated multimodal resources in his posts. Furthermore, among the five most frequently identified categories, metaphors (24.30%) and parallelism (23.36%) were ranked as the two most frequently used rhetorical devices, followed by the integration of multimodal resources (11.21%), anaphora (10.28%), and personification (9.35%).</p>2026-06-29T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2026