Thoughts https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts <div class="page" title="Page 1"> <p><strong>Welcome to </strong><strong><em>Thoughts</em></strong><strong><em><br /></em></strong><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Thoughts</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Department of English. We are proud to carry forward a tradition of fostering academic inquiry in English language, literature, and translation studies.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Our journal serves as a space for meaningful scholarly exchange, encouraging research that explores the richness of language and the complexities of human experience. In a rapidly changing world, </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Thoughts</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> remains committed to highlighting the enduring relevance of the humanities.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We welcome submissions in English linguistics, applied linguistics, second language acquisition, literary studies, film studies, and translation theory and practice. We particularly value research that introduces new perspectives, deepens existing debates, or opens up dialogue across disciplines. All submissions are peer-reviewed by experts to ensure the highest academic standards.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We invite scholars, researchers, and students to share their work with us and become part of our growing academic community. We look forward to your contributions.</span></p> <p><strong> Journal Abbreviation: THTS</strong></p> <p><strong style="font-size: 0.875rem;"> Online ISSN: <strong>2586-906X </strong></strong></p> <p><strong style="font-size: 0.875rem;"> Print ISSN: </strong><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;">1513-1025</span><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> Start Year: 1981</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> Language: English</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: bolder;"> Issues per Year: 2 (January-June, July-December)</span></p> </div> en-US <p>Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.</p><p>Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.</p>All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff. chulathoughts@gmail.com (Sani Chartudomdej) chulathoughts@gmail.com (Suthamas Wangdee) Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Semi-colonial Marginalisation Narratives in Scottish Language Planning and Literature https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/285266 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Scotland’s coloniality remains a topic of scholarly debate. I advocate a semi-colonial approach to Scotland in the context of its institutional, literary and linguistic output prior and immediately following the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence (</span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">indyref</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">). This heuristic can unpick narratives of marginality surrounding the country’s responses to devolved powers and the legacy of its involvement with empire. Firstly, language practice, policies, and planning in Scotland (Scots and Gaelic) are complicated yet accommodated by their marginalised semi-colonial status. Secondly, select examples from the contemporary Scottish literary canon are examined considering postcolonial and semi-colonial critique amidst wider debates of coloniality and cultural marginalisation. This offers a useful corrective to postcolonialism being seen as a form of subtle cultural resistance in Scotland’s case.</span></p> Lauren Rebecca Clark Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/285266 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Weeds in the EcoGothic Gardens in Algernon Blackwood’s “The Transfer” and Walter de la Mare’s “The Tree” https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/286212 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Images of monstrous, carnivorous plants have often dominated Gothic fiction that explores</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">the precarious relationship between humans and nature. Very few works have create</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">d </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">horror from plants in their normalcy. Among these are Blackwood’s “The Transfer” (1912) and de la Mare’s “The Tree” (1922). The two short stories neither present weird species nor animate plants to appear like monsters that capture, kill and devour humans. Instead, they portray plants that naturally grow and die but also have a strong tendency to thrive by drawing lives from other organisms. Relying on ecocritical concepts of inter-relatedness and trans-corporeality, this paper examines such a property of plants found in representations of weeds in the gardens of Blackwood’s and de la Mare’s stories. While the garden is a space where humans cultivate and tend flowers and other kinds of plant, the tenacious and indelible weeds in the gardens in both stories show that humans are merely a component of and subject to their environmental surroundings. As bodies can decompose and lives can be transferred to circumjacent entities, weeds represent the power of nature that proves unrelenting and ecologically fitter to survive than humans. </span></p> Nida Tiranasawasdi Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/286212 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Post-Truth and Poetic Knowing https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/284437 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This paper defines “epistemic resistance” as the active contestation of narratives that shape or distort knowledge—especially relevant in today’s “post-truth” era, where emotions and ideologies often override facts. Focusing on Kabir and Walt Whitman—two poets separated by time, culture, and cosmology—the study employs thematic narrative analysis, supported by NVivo coding of fifty curated excerpts. Drawing on narrative theory, historiography, and deconstruction, it reveals how both poets deploy metaphoric, subversive, and inclusive narrative strategies to contest dominant ideologies. Twenty-one thematic codes, derived inductively and deductively, highlight shared emphases on embodied knowledge, spiritual universality, and pluralist identity. Rather than treating literature as passive cultural expression, the study frames poetic storytelling as a mode of epistemological agency—capable of resisting erasure and reimagining collective belonging. The paper shows that Kabir’s paradoxical verses disrupt simplistic binaries—an approach that exposes the false oppositions found in contemporary political and media discourse. Likewise, Whitman’s inclusive poetic catalogs serve as a model for pluralistic engagement, offering strategies for community-building that resist the fragmentation of the post-truth age, both in civic life and on social media platforms. These findings affirm the relevance of literary epistemology in a fragmented information landscape, illustrating that storytelling serves not only expressive but also structural and ethical roles in the struggle for meaning and truth.</span></p> Pushpraj Singh, Ekta Rana Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/284437 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0700 “Je Reviens”—Returning to Jane Eyre in Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/274749 <p>This paper takes as its starting point the body of feminist criticism that treats Daphne du Maurier’s <em>Rebecca </em>as merely a recapitulation of <em>Jane Eyre</em>, often dismissively, as evidenced in du Maurier scholar Nina Auerbach’s uncharacteristically scathing indictment of the novel, and proposes instead to read it as a narratological continuation or expansion of Jane’s epilogue. Through a close reading of the way that the novel disrupts boundaries between self and other, human and nature, beauty and the sublime, feminine and monstrous, and the domestic order itself, the paper argues that <em>Rebecca</em> is a site in which a certain narrative excess in the earlier novel makes an uncanny reappearance. This approach yields an analysis that highlights how the novel exposes the violence inherent in <em>Jane Eyre’s</em> Gothic romance narrative, wherein a woman's security within the domestic order comes at the expense of another.</p> Proud Sethabutr Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thoughts/article/view/274749 Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0700