A Helpful Buddhist way on Using Social Online Media in Thai Youth Society

Abstract

 A helpful Buddhist way on using online social media in Thai society signifies thorough realization of the actual use of them with mindfulness. No matter of different message contents, images, sounds or motion pictures, recipients must always be mindful of senders’ messages, connotative essence of theirs, reliabilities, communicative purposes, target recipients, expectations from recipients’ responses of theirs. Concurrently, recipients must ponder a careful pace with their own responses to the received messages related to their feelings, opinions and solutions with a careful treatment. After having completely analyzed and assessed data from online social media, we must have appropriate solutions to our own responses that we understand whether a source of data is correct, proper to express our opinions in responses, and necessary to share the data with others. Whatsoever we respond to the data in doubt, we unavoidably perceive adverse impacts that may probably follow. The case is whether we are ready to hold responsibilities for rigid impacts. The guidance is: if everyone keeps their careful pace of its use and knows by themselves what consequences really are, problems arising out of using the said media steadily diminish.  A helpful Buddhist way on using online social media in Thai society signifies thorough realization of the actual use of them with mindfulness. No matter of different message contents, images, sounds or motion pictures, recipients must always be mindful of senders’ messages, connotative essence of theirs, reliabilities, communicative purposes, target recipients, expectations from recipients’ responses of theirs. Concurrently, recipients must ponder a careful pace with their own responses to the received messages related to their feelings, opinions and solutions with a careful treatment. After having completely analyzed and assessed data from online social media, we must have appropriate solutions to our own responses that we understand whether a source of data is correct, proper to express our opinions in responses, and necessary to share the data with others. Whatsoever we respond to the data in doubt, we unavoidably perceive adverse impacts that may probably follow. The case is whether we are ready to hold responsibilities for rigid impacts. The guidance is: if everyone keeps their careful pace of its use and knows by themselves what consequences really are, problems arising out of using the said media steadily diminish.