Analysis for the result of the Implementation in the Provincial Integrated Administration policy

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the outcomes of implementing integrated provincial administration policies. The analysis covers three aspects: 1) Efficiency, 2) Effectiveness, and 3) Sustainability and Policy Expansion. A mixed-method research approach was utilized, collecting quantitative data from integrated provincial administration committees in three provinces: Chonburi, Rayong, and Chachoengsao, totaling 117 participants. Statistical methods used for data analysis include Frequency, Percentage, Mean, and Standard Deviation.
The research findings indicate that: overall, the implementation of integrated provincial administration policies has a moderate average score of 3.07. Examining each aspect individually reveals moderate levels across all three dimensions. Specifically, Effectiveness has the highest average score of 3.09, followed by Efficiency at 3.08, and Sustainability and Expansion at 3.06. Regarding the extremes of each aspect, the highest score in Effectiveness pertains to prioritizing urgent plan and project sequencing for budget allocation before proposing plans, while the lowest is related to regularly reviewing the minimum development plan. In terms of Effectiveness, the highest score is associated with promptly executing procurement upon receiving the minimum approved budget, while the lowest involves designing budget expenditure tracking methods to prevent operational issues. Sustainability's highest score is linked to plans/projects aligned with policies aimed at enhancing people's quality of life through expense reduction, income augmentation, opportunity expansion, and consistent state support. The lowest score in Sustainability relates to plans/projects aligned with policies to alleviate poverty and social inequality.