Oral health–related quality of life and satisfaction in removable complete denture wearers with traditional and simplified impression method
Keywords:
Oral health–related quality of life, Removable complete denture, Traditional impression method, Simplified impression methodAbstract
This survey research by cross-sectional study aiming to study and compare oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction of removable complete denture wearers with traditional and simplified impression method. The subjects were the 32 patients who received removable complete denture with traditional and simplified impression method at Sirindhorn Khon Kaen hospital. Random sampling into 2 groups, each group contained 16 persons that met the inclusion criteria and signed consent form. The data were collected by the questionnaires and were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.
The results were revealed that 32 patients have an average age of 66.4 ± 7.9 years. 53.1% were male and 46.9% were female. 59.4% had moderate oral health–related quality of life and had highly satisfied at the level of 94.5 ± 4.1. There were no statistically significant differences in oral health–related quality of life and satisfaction between the 2 groups of traditional and simplified impression method (p>.05).
References
สำนักงานสถิติแห่งชาติ กระทรวงดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรษฐกิจและสังคม.การสำรวจอนามัยและสวัสดิการ พ.ศ.2565. กรุงเทพมหานคร: บริษัทธนาแพรสจำกัด. 2565.
กรมกิจการผู้สูงอายุ. สถานการณ์ผู้สูงอายุไทย พ.ศ.2565. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพฯ: บริษัท อมรินทร์ คอร์เปอเรชั่นส์ จำกัด (มหาชน); 2566.
สำนักทันตสาธารณสุข กรมอนามัย กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. รายงานผลการสำรวจสภาวะสุขภาพช่องปากแห่งชาติ ครั้งที่ 8 ประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2560. นนทบุรี: สำนักทันตสาธารณสุข กรมอนามัย กระทรวงสาธารณสุข; 2561.
โรงพยาบาลสิรินธร จังหวัดขอนแก่น. รายงานทันตกรรม แยกตามหัตถการ. เข้าถึงเมื่อวันที่ 3 มกราคม 2567 จากโปรแกรม HOSxP.
Martin AM, Guimaraes LS, Campos CH, Kuchler EC, Pereira DM, Maia LC, et al. The effect of complete dentures on edentulous patients’ oral health-related quality of life in long-term: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Res J. 2021; 18(1): 65. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ 34584643/
Winkler S. Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics. 2nd edition. St. Louis: PSG Publishing Company INC; 1988.
Levin B. Impressions for Complete Dentures. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1984.
ดนัย ยอดสุวรรณ. ฟันเทียมทั้งปาก 1. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. ขอนแก่น: โรงพิมพ์คลังนานาวิทยา; 2560.
ดนัย ยอดสุวรรณ. ฟันเทียมทั้งปาก 2. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. ขอนแก่น: โรงพิมพ์คลังนานาวิทยา; 2561.
Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Simplified complete dentures. Dent Clin N Am. 2004; 48(3): 625-40.
Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Manaseer WE, et al. Simplified versus conventional complete dentures: A randomized crossover clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2024; 131(1): 50-5.
Jo A, Kanazawa M, Sato Y, Iwaki M, Akiba N. A randomized controlled trial of the different impression methods for the complete denture fabrication: Patient reported outcomes. J Dentistry. 2015; 43(8): 989-96.
Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 446-50.
พิมพ์วิภา เศรษฐวรพันธุ์, ทรงชัย ฐิตโสมกุล และไพฑูรย์ ดาวสดใส. คุณภาพชีวิตในมิติสุขภาพช่องปากของผู้สูงอายุที่ใส่ฟันเทียมทั้งปาก และความสัมพันธ์กับคุณภาพฟันเทียมและประสิทธิภาพการบดเคี้ยว ที่ประเมินด้วยดัชนี OHIP-EDENT ในรูปแบบภาษาไทย. วิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์. 2557; 64(1): 26-46.
Celebic A, Knezovic-Zlataric D. A comparison of patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent. 2003; 31: 445-51.
Alfadda SA. The relationship between various parameters of complete denture quality and patients’ satisfaction. 2014; 145(9): 941-8.
Soboleva U, Rogovska I. Edentulous patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures. Medicina. 2022; 58(2): 344-54.
Regis RR, Cunha TR, Vecchia D, Ribeiro AB, Silva-Lovato CH, De Souza RF. A randomized trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40(7): 535-45.
Nunez MCO, Silva DC, Barcelos BA, Leles CR. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life after treatment with traditional and simplified protocols for complete denture construction. Gerodontology. 2015; 32(4): 247-53.
Rad HM, Asli HN, Rebiei M, Falahchai M, Ghasemi F. Effect of complete denture therapy on oral health-related quality of life of edentulous patient. Enviro Dental J. 2020; 2(1): 21-8.
Shrestha B, Basnet BB, Adhikari G. A questionnaire study on the impact on oral-health-related quality of life by conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patient. BDJ Open. 2020; 6(3). Available from https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-0029-5.
Albuquerque IS, Regis RR, de Souza RF, Gurgel KF, Silva PG, et al. Is a two-step impression mandatory for complete denture fabrication on the severely resorbed mandible? A randomized trial on patient perception and denture quality. J Dent. 2020; 98. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent. 2020.103356.
Albuquerque IS, Freitas-Pontes KM, de Souza RF, Negreiros WA, Ramos MB, et al. Is a two-step impression mandatory for complete denture fabrication on the severely resorbed mandible? A randomized trial on mastication, patient satisfaction and adjustments. J Dent. 2020; 99. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent. 2020.103357.
Kawai Y, Muarakami H, Feine JS. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? A 10-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018; 74(4): 30-6.
Hsu YJ, Lin JR, Hsu JF. Patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes and oral health-related quality of life after treatment with traditional and modified protocols for complete dentures. J Dent Sciences. 2021; 16(1): 236-40.
Ceruti P, Mobilio N, Bellia E, Borracchini A, Catapano S, Gassino G. Simplified edentulous treatment: A multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the timing and clinical outcomes of the technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118(4): 462-7.
Vecchia MPD, Regis RR, Cunha TR, Andrade IM, Matta JCS, Souza RF. A randomized trial on simplified and conventional methods for complete denture fabrication: Cost analysis. J Prosthodontics. 2014; 23(3): 182-91.
Sanjeevan V, Rajagopal P, Venkitachalam R, Aras M. Efficiency of simplified versus traditional denture fabrication methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 126(3): 377-85.
Ye Ye, Jian Sun. Simplified complete denture: A systematic review of the literature. J Prosthodont. 2017; 26(4): 267-74.
Regis RR, Alves CCS, Rocha SSM, Negreiros WA, Freitas-Pontes KM. The importance of a two-step impression procedure for complete denture fabrication: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2016; 43(10): 771-7.
Paulino MR, Alves LR, Gurgel BCV, Calderon PS. Simplified versus traditional techniques for complete denture fabrication: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113(1): 12-6.
Kawai Y, Muarakami H, Shariati B, Klemetti E, Blomfield JV, Billette L, et al. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques?. J Dent. 2005; 33(8): 659-68.
Yamaga E, Sato Y, Minakuchi S. A structural equation model relating oral condition, denture quality, chewing ability, satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life in complete denture wearers. J Dent. 2013; 41(8): 710-7.
Subin KM, Koli DK, Jain V, Pruthi G, Nanda A. Comparison of ridge resorption and patient satisfaction in single implant-supported mandibular overdentures with conventional complete dentures: A randomized pilot study. J Oral Bio Craniofac Res 2021; 11(1): 71-7.
Devi BV, Ahmed N, Ganapathy D, Maiti S, Pandurangan KK. Expectation of treatment outcomes in complete denture wearers. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022; 18(1): 277-81.
