Comparison of the fracture detection capabilities between 1 mm and 3 mm bone reconstructions in CT brain imaging

Authors

  • Phonraphak Punpheng -

Keywords:

CT brain, fracture diagnosis

Abstract

     This retrospective analytical study aimed to compare the fracture detection capabilities between 1 mm and 3 mm bone reconstructions in CT brain imaging. Data were collected from patients with a history of head trauma who underwent CT brain scans from the PACs (Picture Archiving and Communication system), Envisions systems between October 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024, involving a sample of 710 participants. CT images from patients diagnosed with head trauma were retrospectively reviewed by a radiologist with at least three years of experience. The radiologist initially reviewed the 3 mm bone reconstruction images, waited one week, and then reviewed the 1 mm bone reconstruction images, with patient information anonymized. The number of fracture lines identified was compared, and relationships were analyzed using statistical principles. For continuous variables, the mean (standard deviation) and percentage were reported, and data were analyzed using Stata version 10 to address the research questions.
     Results: Among the 695 patients with head injuries, 92 (13.2%) had fractures, with a mean age of 40.9 ± 21.6 years. Most patients were male (62.9%). When comparing fracture detection capabilities between 3 mm and 1 mm bone reconstructions, both reconstructions showed consistent diagnostic outcomes. The ROC curve analysis and comparison of the area under the curve (AUC) yielded a value of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99, p=0.042), indicating that the 3 mm bone reconstruction performed well in detecting fractures but differed significantly from the 1 mm reconstruction in terms of statistical significance.

References

Chaudhary F, Malik SS, Gilani SY, Zia M, Ahsan A, Ashraf M, et al. INCIDENCE OF SKULL FRACTURE IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD INJURY ON CT SCAN. Asian Journal of Allied Health Sciences (AJAHS). 2020;5(2):23-28.

Chawla H, Malhotra R, Yadav RK, Griwan MS, Paliwal PK, Aggarwal AD. Diagnostic utility of conventional radiography in head injury. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015;9(6):TC13-TC15.

Elfeky M. Skull Fractures: Radiology Reference Article [internet]. 2024. [ cited 2024 August 15]. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/skull-fractures

Kim DH, Choi YH, Yun SJ, Lee SH. Diagnostic performance of brain computed tomography to detect facial bone fractures. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine. 2018;5(2):107-112.

Armbrust LJ. PACS and image storage. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 2009;39(4):711-718.

Maetani K, Namiki J, Matsumoto S, Matsunami K, Narumi A, Tsuneyoshi T, et al. Routine Head Computed Tomography for Patients in the Emergency Room with Trauma Requires Both Thick‐and Thin‐Slice Images. Emergency medicine international [internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 August.16];2016(1):[about 4p]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26981282

Sharif-Alhoseini M, Khodadadi H, Chardoli M, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Indications for brain computed tomography scan after minor head injury. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. 2011;4(4):472-476.

Cleveland Clinic. Skull fractures: types, treatment and prevention [Internet]. 2023. [cited 2024 Nov 16]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/skull-fracture

Takagi S, Koyama M, Hayashi K, Kawauchi T. Image Quality Required for the Diagnosis of Skull Fractures Using Head CT: A Comparison of Conventional and Improved Reconstruction Kernels. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2016;37(11):1992-1995.

van Ooijen PMA, ten Bhomer PJM, Oudkerk M. PACS storage requirements—influence of changes in imaging modalities. International Congress Series. 2005;1281:888-893.

Bordignon KC, Arruda WO. CT scan findings in mild head trauma: a series of 2,000 patients. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2002;60:204-210.

Dehbozorgi A, Mousavi-Roknabadi RS, Hosseini-Marvast SR, Sharifi M, Sadegh R, Farahmand F, et al. Diagnosing skull fracture in children with closed head injury using point-of-care ultrasound vs. computed tomography scan. European Journal of

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Punpheng, P. (2024). Comparison of the fracture detection capabilities between 1 mm and 3 mm bone reconstructions in CT brain imaging. Journal of Environmental Education Medical and Health, 9(4), 198–205. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hej/article/view/279285