Predicting factor related to positive outcome of using HFNC in pediatric patients admitted to Saraburi Hospital
Keywords:
Heat Humidified High Flow Nasal Canular (HHHFNC), Successfulness in treatment using HHHFNCAbstract
This study was survey research aimed to determine the success rate of HHHFNC treatment in pediatric patients and to examine the associations between age, diagnosis, respiratory failure score (RS), and heart rate with treatment success. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Saraburi Hospital using data from medical records of pediatric patients aged 1 month to 15 years who received HHHFNC. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, and multivariable risk (binary) regression analysis.
Among 112 pediatric patients, the success rate of HHHFNC treatment was 72.32%. A decrease in RS of at least 2 points at 60 minutes after initiating HHHFNC was found to be a statistically significant predictor of treatment success (Adjusted Risk Ratio -2.59, 95% CI 0.22–0.81, p = 0.010).
References
Farias JA, Frutos F, Esteban A, Casado Flores J, Retta A, Baltodano A, et al.(2004). What is the daily practice of mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units: A multicenter study. Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care. 2004;30:918-25.
Teague WG.(2003). Non-invasive ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit for children with acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;35(6):418-26.
Garpestad E, Brennan J, Hill NS.(2009). Non-invasive ventilation for critical care. Chest. 2007;132(2):711-20.
Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH.(2009). Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med. 2009;103(10):1400-5.
Frizzola M, Miller TL, Rodriguez ME, Zhu Y, Rojas J, Hesek A, et al.(2011). High-flow nasal cannula: impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung model. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46(1):67-74.
Pham TM, O'Malley L, Mayfield S, Martin S, Schibler A.(2015). The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(7):713-20.
Schibler A, Pham TM, Dunster KR, Foster K, Barlow A, Gibbons K, et al.(2011). Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high-flow nasal prong oxygen delivery. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(5):847-52.
Wing R, James C, Maranda LS, Armsby CC.(2012). Use of high-flow nasal cannula support in the emergency department reduces the need for intubation in pediatric acute respiratory insufficiency. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(11):1117-23.
Pilar J, Lopez Y, Morteruel E.(2015). High flow oxygen therapy and continuous positive airway pressure. In: Medina A, Pons-Odena M, Martinon-Torres F, editors. Noninvasive Ventilation in Pediatrics. 3rd ed. Madrid: Ergon; 2015. p. 53-60.
Can FK, Anil MB, Zengin N, Durak F, Alparslan C.(2017). Predictive factor for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful? J Crit Care. 2017;16(7):1-9.
Morris JV, Kapetanstrataki M, Parslow RC, Davis PJ, Ramnarayan P.(2019). Patterns of use of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy in PICUs in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(3):223-32.
Can FK, Anil AB, Anil M, Zengin N, Bal A, et al.(2017). Impact of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in quality improvement and clinical outcomes in a non-invasive ventilation pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;54:835-40.
Syananondh K, Deesomchok A.(2016). Comparison of heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for postextubation respiratory care in preterm infants. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;33(2):156-67.
