EFFECT OF NETWORK BUILDING AND SOCIAL SUPPORT ON THE BEHAVIOR OF HAZARDOUS DRUG CONSUMPTION AMONG THE POPULATION IN LALOM SUBDISTRICT, PHUSING DISTRICT, SISAKET PROVINCE
Keywords:
Program, Network, social support, consumption behavior, hazardous drugsAbstract
The purpose of this quasi-experimental research aimed to study the effects of a networking program with social support on hazardous drug consumption behavior of residents in Lalom Subdistrict, Phusing District, Sisaket Province. The sample was divided into two groups, each consisting of 35 participants, totaling 70 participants. The experimental group consisted of residents of Lalom Subdistrict, Phusing District, Sisaket Province, and the comparison group consisted of residents of PhraiPhatthana Subdistrict, Phusing District, Sisaket Province. The experimental group received a program developed by the researcher for 12 weeks, while the comparison group received a conventional program. Data were collected using questionnaires twice: before and after the experiment, from September 13, 2025 to December 6, 2025 Descriptive statistics were used to present frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, median, and 25th and 75th percentiles. Paired t-test was used to compare mean scores of variables within the experimental and comparison groups, and ANCOVA was used to compare means of variable scores between the experimental and comparison groups, with a significance level of 0.05 The results indicated that, after the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores than at baseline for knowledge of dangerous drugs, attitudes toward dangerous drugs, perceived susceptibility to dangerous drugs, perceived severity of dangerous drugs, perceived benefits of reducing dangerous drug use, perceived barriers to reducing dangerous drug use, social support for reducing dangerous drug consumption, network-building for reducing dangerous drug consumption, perceived self-efficacy in reducing dangerous drug consumption, and dangerous drug consumption behaviors (p < 0.05). Furthermore, after controlling for baseline mean scores, significant differences were observed between the experimental and comparison groups in all aforementioned variables at the 0.05 significance level.
References
วรรณี ศรีสง่า. (2562). การศึกษาพฤติกรรมการใช้ยาของประชาชนในเขตภาคอีสาน. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
นิติพัฒน์ กิตติรักษกุล, & รุจิกาญจน์ สานนท์. (2565). การสร้างเครือข่ายการดูแลสุขภาพในชุมชน. วารสารสุขภาพชุมชน, 34(3), 12-25.
Helliwell, J. A., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2023). Social networks and health behavior: A quantitative study. Journal of Urban Health, 45(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09876-9
Kaplan, S. L., & O’Neill, J. T. (2021). The role of social support networks in community health promotion. Health Promotion International, 36(4), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz056
เลาหะวิชัย, อ. (2564). การพัฒนาเครือข่ายทางสังคมเพื่อการส่งเสริมสุขภาพในชุมชน. วารสารวิจัยสุขภาพ, 29(1), 45-59.
Green, M. T., & Miller, K. D. (2022). Strengthening social networks to improve hospital care delivery: A case study. Healthcare Management Review, 47(1), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000327
อารีวัณย์ เชื้อชาร. (2566). สรุปผลงานโรคไม่ติดต่อเรื้อรัง. สำนักงานสาธารณสุขจังหวัดศรีสะเกษ
Lemeshow, Stanley. WHO ; Date. Chichester [England] ; New York : J. Wiley for the World Health Organization, 1990. ; Description. xii, 239 p. : ill.
