Direct Resin Composite Restoration for Maxillary Midline Diastema Closure in a Patient with Low Frenum Attachment: A Case Report

Authors

  • Anongnat Hunngam -

Keywords:

Diastema closure, Resin composite, Labial frenectomy

Abstract

     This clinical case report aims to present a comprehensive diagnostic approach, management of underlying etiologic factors, direct resin composite restoration for maxillary midline diastema closure, and posterior prosthodontic rehabilitation to achieve long-term clinical success. This case study presented a Thai female patient who sought dental treatment due to broken and defective existing restorations on her maxillary central incisors. The dentist gathered data through history taking, oral examination, and radiographic evaluation. Diagnostic findings revealed defective restoration margins on the maxillary central incisors, a low-attached labial frenum crossing the alveolar ridge—identified as the primary etiologic factor for the diastema—and missing mandibular posterior teeth. A structured treatment plan was executed, comprising a labial frenectomy, removal of defective restorations, direct resin composite closure of the maxillary midline diastema, fabrication of a removable partial denture for the mandibular arch, and oral hygiene instruction. Treatment outcomes were evaluated based on clinical parameters, periapical radiographs, masticatory efficiency, and patient satisfaction at an 8-month follow-up.

     The results demonstrated that the resin composite restorations remained in good condition with excellent marginal adaptation to the teeth. The surrounding periodontal tissues were healthy with no radiographic evidence of additional alveolar bone resorption. The patient achieved efficient mastication and expressed high satisfaction with her smile aesthetics and dental contour.

References

Ziahosseini P, Hussain F, Millar BJ. Management of gingival black triangles. Br Dent J. 2014;217(10):559-63.

Joshi A, Soni SK, Yadav S, Goel M. Evaluation of labial frenum attachment in children of Udaipur population. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021;39(3):308-12.

Sanin C, Savara BS. Factors that influence the closure of space between maxillary central incisors. Am J Orthod. 1972;61(3):282-95.

Azzaldeen A, Watted N, Borbély P. Maxillary midline diastema: Restorative and orthodontic management. Int J Maxillofac Res. 2018;4(2):45-53.

Gass JR, McLean J, Todd AI. The genetics of midline diastema: A twin study design. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48(7):511-8.

Nainar SM, Gnanasundaram N. Incidence and etiology of midline diastema in a Southern Indian population. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19(2):102-6.

Kaimenyi JM. Occurrence of midline diastema and frenum attachments amongst school children in Nairobi, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 1998;75(11):654-7.

Adams EM, Green JC. Clinical evaluation of the blanching test in diagnosing abnormal frenum attachments. J Periodontol. 2012;83(4):441-7.

Abraham R, Kamat V. Midline diastema and its relationship with deleterious oral habits: A clinical study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(2):e240-4.

Beasley MS, Smith RJ. The effect of digit sucking on the patency of the maxillary midline suture and diastema formation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(5):622-9.

Helvey GA. Direct composite resin restorations of the maxillary midline diastema: An aesthetic challenge. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2007;19(6):353-60.

Ritter AV, Boushell LW, Walter R. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019.

เฉลิมพล ลี้ไวโรจน์. ทันตกรรมบูรณะเพื่อความสวยงาม (Esthetic Restorative Dentistry). กรุงเทพฯ: พิมพ์ดี; 2558.

DeSeta R, Blandino M, Restrestpo MC. The effect of labial frenectomy on the stability of direct composite restorations in maxillary midline diastema: A retrospective study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(4):332-9.

Viswambaran M, Kumar A, Sharma M. restprestpative versus orthodontic closure of midline diastema in adult patients: Patient satisfaction and preference. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16(2):148-54.

Elkaffas AA, Al-Zordk W, El-Banna MS. Esthetic management of midline diastema using porcelain veneers vs direct composite restprestpations: A systematic review. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(3):284-98.

Korkut B, Yanıkoğlu N, Gündoğdu M. Direct composite laminate veneers versus ceramic veneers: A 2-year randomized clinical trial. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):155-63.

El-Rashidy AA, El-Mowafy O, Abdel-Karim A. Five-year clinical performance of direct composite restprestpations for midline diastema closure. Oper Dent. 2017;42(6):589-97.

Lamas Ramirez T, Cacciuttolo F, Gordan VV. Retention and annual failure rate of direct resin composite in anterior teeth: A 4-year retrospective clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(8):4911-20.

El-Rashidy AA, El-Deeb HA, El-Sayed AM. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors affecting color stability of direct composite restprestpations in the anterior aesthetic zone. J Dent Res Clin Rev. 2020;7(1):12-9.

Lamas Ramirez T, Silva J, Martinez C. Long-term changes in periodontal tissue and restoration margins following diastema closure: A 5-year follow-up study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022;42(3):365-73.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Hunngam, A. (2026). Direct Resin Composite Restoration for Maxillary Midline Diastema Closure in a Patient with Low Frenum Attachment: A Case Report. Journal of Environmental Education Medical and Health, 11(3), 213–223. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hej/article/view/298453