The Vietnamese Origin of the 12-Year Names in Saek

Main Article Content

Pittayawat Pittayaporn

Abstract

This research note shows that all 12 zodiac names in Tai-language Saek derive from Vietnamese rather than directly from Chinese. Eight names can be securely identified as premodern Vietnamese loans based on regular sound changes, while the remaining four suggest Vietnamese origins. These results provide new evidence for Vietnamese–Saek contact in the 16th to 18th centuries and underscore the role of Vietnamese as an intermediary in the spread of Chinese calendrical systems in mainland Southeast Asia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pittayawat Pittayaporn. (2026). The Vietnamese Origin of the 12-Year Names in Saek. The Journal of the Siam Society, 114(1), 215–222. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pub_jss/article/view/296024
Section
Research Notes

References

• Baxter, William & Sagart, Laurent. 2014. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.

• Boltz, William G. 1991. The Old Chinese Terrestrial Names in Saek. In Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages, ed. by William G. Boltz & Michael C. Shapiro, 53–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

• Chamberlain, James R. 1998. The Origin of the Sek: Implications for Tai and Vietnamese History. Journal of the Siam Society 86(1–2): 27–48.

• Chavannes, Édouard. 1906. Le cycle turc des douze animaux. T’oung Pao 7(1): 51–122.

• Cœdès, George. 1935. L’origine du cycle des douze animaux au Cambodge. T’oung Pao 3: 315–329.

• Egerod, Søren. 1957. The Eighth Earthly Branch in Archaic Chinese and Tai. Oriens 10(2): 196–199.

• Ferlus, Michel. 1992. Histoire abrégée de l’évolution des consonnes initiales du Vietnamien. Mon–Khmer Studies 20: 111–127.

―――. 1994. Some Peculiarities of Cuoi Cham, a Vietic Language of Nghe-An (Vietnam). Paper presented at Neuvièmes Journées de Linguistique de l’Asie Orientale, May 1994, Paris.

―――. 2010. Le cycle khmer des douze animaux : histoire d’un contact ancien entre Vietnam et Cambodge. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 39(1): 3–19.

• Gedney, William J. 1970. The Saek Language of Nakhon Phanom Province. Journal of the Siam Society 58(1): 67–87.

―――. 1993. The Twelve Year Names in Saek. In William J. Gedney’s Saek Language: Glossaries, Texts, and Translations, ed. by Thomas J. Hudak, 975–989. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

• Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1958. Les Sek de la province du Cammon (Laos), migration thai ou déportation chinoise ? Journal asiatique 246: 107–108.

―――. 1963. Remarques sur les initiales complexes de la langue sek. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 58(1): 156–163.

• Hudak, Thomas J., ed. 1991. William J. Gedney’s the Yay Language: Glossary, Texts, and Translations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

―――, ed. 1993. William J. Gedney’s the Saek Language: Glossary, Texts, and Translations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

―――, ed. 1996. William J. Gedney’s the Lue Language: Glossary, Texts, and Translations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

―――. 2007. William J. Gedney's Comparative Tai Source Book. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

• Kosaka Ryuichi. 1997. On the Loans of Vietnamese Origin in the Saek Language. In Southeast Asian Linguistics Studies in Honor of Vichin Panupong, ed. by Arthur S. Abramson, 127–146. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

• Kourilsky, Grégory, 2021. Jours propices, jours funestes : calendriers traditionnels en milieu bouddhiste thaï. In Calendriers d’Europe et d’Asie, ed. by Alain Arrault, Olivier Guyotjeannin & Perrine Mane, 143-343. Paris: École nationale des Chartes.

• Li, Fang-kuei. 1945. Some Old Chinese Loan Words in the Tai Languages. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 8(3): 333–342.

―――. 1971. 上古音研究 [Studies on Archaic Chinese Phonology]. 清華學報 [Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies] 9(1–2): 1–61.

―――. 1977. A Handbook of Comparative Tai. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

• Pittayawat Pittayaporn. 2024. Revisiting “Aberrant” Features in Saek: Contact-Induced Changes and Its Position within Tai. Linguistics of the Tibeto–Burman Area 47(1): 90–111.

• Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1991. Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

• Rhodes, Alexandre de. 1651. Dictionarium Annamiticum Lusitanum et Latinum. Rome: Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide.

• Shimizu Masaaki. 2020. Sino–Vietnamese Initials Reflected in the Phonetic Components of 15th-Century Nôm Characters. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems 4(3): 183–195.

• Somsonge Burusphat & Qin Xiaohang. 2006. Northern Zhuang Chinese–Thai–English Dictionary. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University Press.

• Terwiel, Barend J. 1981. Tai Peoples and the Computation of Time, a Comparative Perspective. Oriens Extremus 28(1): 62–106.

• Wilaiwan Khanitthanant (วิไลวรรณ ขนิษฐานันท์). 2552 BE (2009 CE). ปฏิทินจีนโบราณ: ที่มาของปฏิทินไทยโบราณ “ปีหนไทย” [Ancient Chinese Calendar: The Origin of the Ancient Thai Calendar “Pi Hon Thai”]. ภาษาและภาษาศาสตร์ [Language & Linguistics] 28(1): 34–52.