An Analysis Research Output on Global Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis

Main Article Content

Pornnisa Wattanasiri
Wirapong Chansanam

Abstract

The objective of this research is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of research output in the fields of Global Library and Information Science (LIS) on Scopus database for the period (2021-2023) using the Bibliometrix-R program. Additionally, it aims to measure the impact and popularity of academic publications through Altmetric.com. The study revealed a total of 2,056 relevant research articles, with the highest research output coming from the United States. Wuhan University emerged as the leading institution in terms of research output in LIS. When assessing the popularity of publications on social media, Mendeley ranked highest, followed by other platforms like news outlets and X users. The bibliometric analysis conducted in this study contributes to a better understanding of trends and contextual factors influencing research dissemination and citation patterns. Notably, it aids in promoting collaboration and understanding the impact of research by measuring the outcomes. The research trends identified during the three-year period include topics such as Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data, Research trends, Diversity, Data mining, Online learning, and Public libraries. An important aspect highlighted is the support for collaborative citation practices to strengthen cooperation in disseminating LIS research. Lastly, Altmetric analysis serves as a novel approach to identifying research discussions in academic circles that deserve attention in future studies within the field of LIS and other related disciplines.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Agarwal, A., et al. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 296-309.

Alexeev, Y., et al. (2021). Quantum computer systems for scientific discovery. PRX Quantum, 2(1), 017001.

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.

Berahmand, K., Nasiri, E., Rostami, M., & Forouzandeh, S. (2021). A modified DeepWalk method for link prediction in attributed social network. Computing, 103(10), 2227–2249.

Blais, A., Grimsmo, A.L., Girvin, S.M., & Wallraff, A. (2021). Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 93(2), 025005.

Chanlun, J. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of published research on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in library and information science of Asian countries. TLA Research Journal. 16(1), 37-56. [in Thai]

Chang, J., et al. (2021). Detecting telecom single photons with 99.5 - 2.07 + 0.5 % system detection efficiency and high time resolution. APL Photonics, 6(3), 0039772.

Daassi, M., & Debbabi, S. (2021). Intention to reuse AR-based apps: The combined role of the sense of immersion, product presence and perceived realism. Information and Management, 58(4), 103453.

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J.A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831.

Galvin, T. (1977). Pittsburgh. University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Library and Information Sciences. In A. Kent, H. Lancour and J.E. Daily (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (pp. 280-291). New York: Marcel Dekker.

Goksoy, B., & Bozkurt, H. (2020). Social attention of the top 50 scientific articles on gastric cancer: Bibliometric and altmetric analysis. Journal of B.U.ON., 25(5), 2322–2331.

Golub, K., & Hansson, J. (2017). (Big) data in library and information science: A brief overview of some important problem areas. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(11), 1098–1108.

Hjørland, B. (2018a). Library and Information Science (LIS), Part 1. Knowledge Organization, 45(3), 232-254.

Hjørland, B. (2018b). Library and Information Science (LIS), Part 2. Knowledge Organization, 45(4), 319-338.

Hsiao, T.-M., & Chen, K.-H. (2020). The dynamics of research subfields for library and Information science: an investigation based on word bibliographic coupling. Scientometrics, 125(1), 717-737.

Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., & Jabeen, M. (2015). Research productivity of library scholars bibliometric analysis of growth and trends of LIS publications. New Library World, 116(7-8), 433-454.

Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2022). LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 65-88.

Joshi, M.A. (2015). Bibliometric indicators for evaluating the quality of scientific publications. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 15(2), 258–262.

Karabay, F., Demirci, M., Tuncer, S., Tekçe, N., & Berkman, M. (2024). A bibliometric and altmetric analysis of the 100 top most cited articles on dentin adhesives. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28(1), 92.

Li, R., Lu, Y., Ma, J., & Wang, W. (2021). Examining gifting behavior on live streaming platforms: An identity-based motivation model. Information and Management, 58(6), 103406.

Maporn, P., Puseerit, J., & Rungwisai, P. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of Thai journals indexed in Scopus. TLA Bulletin, 67(1), 177-198.

Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M. (2016). When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 191-199.

Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Yudkevich, M. (2021). The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns. Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), 101110.

Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information and Management, 58(3), 103434.

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228.

Panahi, S., Lotfi, M., & Ouchi, A. (2022). Global research trends and hot topics on library and information science: A bibliometric analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7073.

Patil, S.S., et al. (2023). Environmental tobacco smoke and children’s health: a bibliometric and altmetric analysis of 100 most cited articles. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2208.

Putri, S.S.M., Fuad, A., & Maula, A.W. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of PubMed literature on coronavirus: All time period. BIO Web of Conferences, 28, 01001.

Rahimi, F., Riahinia, N., Nourmohammadi, H., Sotudeh, H., & TavakoliZadeh-Ravari, M. (2019). How academia and society pay attention to climate changes: A bibliometric and altmetric analysis. Webology, 16(2), 108–127.

Ren, Z., Shen, Q., Diao, X., & Xu, H. (2021). A sentiment-aware deep learning approach for personality detection from text. Information Processing and Management, 58(3), 102532.

Robinson, D.B.T., Powell, A.G.M.T., Waterman, J., Hopkins, L., James, O.P., Egan, R.J., & Lewis, W.G. (2021). Predictive value of altmetric score on citation rates and bibliometric impact. BJS Open, 5(1), zraa039.

Rostami, C., Nemati-Anaraki, L., Asadzandi, S., & Saberi, M.K. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Scientific Publications of Iran University of Medical Sciences during 1980-2020. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 22(1), 223-240.

Sweeney, M.E., & Estabrook, L.S. (2018). Citation analysis. In McDonald, J.D., & Levine-Clark, M. (Eds.). In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (pp. 2768-2774). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2017). Research methods in library and information science. In Dora, S.O. (Ed.). Qualitative versus Quantitative Research. (pp. 43-64). London: IntechOpen.

Too, J., & Mirjalili, S. (2021). A hyper learning binary dragonfly algorithm for feature selection: A COVID-19 Case Study. Knowledge-Based Systems, 212, 106553.

Zhou, G., Zhang, R., & Huang, S. (2021). Generalized Buffering Algorithm. IEEE Access, 9, 27140–27157, 9350239.