Application of Dashboard for Workforce Planning: Development and Technology Acceptance
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to develop and apply a dashboard for visualizing workforce data and related information to support decision-making in workforce planning. The research employed a research and development (R&D) approach. The evaluation focused on user acceptance of the dashboard for workforce planning decision-making. The study involved 36 participants, including executives, personnel, and stakeholders directly engaged in using the dashboard. The findings revealed that users demonstrated high acceptance of the dashboard technology. The Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) was rated at the highest level overall (x̅=4.53, S.D.=0.54), Perceived Usefulness (PU) was also rated at the highest level overall (x̅=4.58, S.D.=0.52), Attitude Toward Using (ATU) was rated at the highest level overall (x̅=4.67, S.D.=0.50), and Effort Expectancy (EE) was rated at a high level overall (x̅=4.46, S.D.=0.64). These results indicate that users found the dashboard easy to learn and use and beneficial for effectively supporting decision-making in workforce planning for executives and organizations. Users exhibited a positive attitude toward the dashboard and were willing to adopt new digital technologies as tools to enhance their work efficiency, further improving overall productivity.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกเรื่องที่ลงตีพิมพ์จะได้รับการตรวจอ่านโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ความคิดเห็นและบทความที่ปรากฏในวารสารนี้ เป็นของผู้เขียนซึ่งมิใช่เป็นความคิดเห็นของคณะผู้จัดทำ และมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของสมาคมห้องสมุดแห่งประเทศไทยฯ การนำบทความในวารสารนี้ไปตีพิมพ์ซ้ำต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากคณะผู้จัดทำ
All articles submitted for publication will be reviewed by the academic reviewers. The editorial board and TLA claim no responsibility for the content or opinions expressed by the authors of individual articles or columns in this journal. Reprinting of any articles in this journal must be permitted by the editorial board.
References
Alabi, O.A., Ajayi, F.A., Udeh, C.A., and Efunniyi, C.P. (2024). Predictive analytics in human resources: Enhancing workforce planning and customer experience. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 11(9), 2321-2705. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI
Cappelli, P., and Keller, J. R. (2014). Talent management: Conceptual approaches and practical challenges. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 305-331.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dicarlo, R. and Niño, Á.M. (2023). Use dashboards to support decision making in operations management. In: 2023 IEEE Colombian Caribbean Conference (C3), Barranquilla, Colombia, 2023 (pp. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1109/C358072.2023.10436318.
Gupta, A., Ali, F., Singh, B.K., and Janarthanan, S. (2023). HR dashboard analytics. In: Proceeding of 2023 5th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N). Greater Noida, India (pp.17-21). https://doi.org/10.1109/icac3n60023.2023.10541573
Johar, R.K. (2024).HR analytics and its impact on organizations performance. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM), 8(04), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM32727
Kaufmann, U. H., and Tan, A.B.C. (2023). Data analytics for organizational development workforce analytics. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.10029781118445112.stat08451
Kanagachidambaresan, G.R., and N., Bharathi. (2023). Introduction to dashboards. In: Sensors and Protocols for Industry 4.0. Maker Innovations Series. Apress Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9007-1_5
Khatuwal, V.S., and Puri, D. (2022). Business intelligence tools for dashboard development. In: Proceedings of 2022 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM). London, United Kingdom (pp.128–131). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEM54221.2022.9853086
Konkid, A., Janpet,J., and Junlabuddee, S. (2024). Development of dashboard to support workforce planning decisions of human resource section. In: Proceeding of 4th National conference on Srikhotraboon Studies (pp.829-842). Organize by Research and Development Institute Nakhon Phanom University, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand. 7th November 2024. [In Thai]
Marler, J. H., and Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3-26.
Penphu, W. and Wongupparaj, P. (2024). Developing Information System for Managing Academic Servicesof the College of Research Methodology and Cognitive Science, Burapha University. Mahidol R2R e-Journal, 11(1), 91-103. [In Thai]
Popo-Olaniyan, O., James, O.O., Udeh, C.A., Daraojimba, R.E., and Ogedengbe, D.E. (2022). Future-proofing human resources in the U.S. with AI: a review of trends and implications. International journal of management & entrepreneurship research (pp.641-658). https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v4i12.676
Rovinelli, R.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (1976). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Paper presented at: The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: California. April 19–23, 1976) Retrieved December 20, 2024 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fultlext/ED121845.pdf.
Schwab, K., Zahidi, S., and Waughray, D. (2017). The role of human capital in the digital transformation of business. Global HR Journal, 28(1), 29–40.
Srisaard, B. (2018). The Interpreting of results using rating scale data collection instrument. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 2(1), 64-70. [In Thai]
Thomhin, L., and Chairatana, P. (2024). Information technology acceptance of personnel in the office of The Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat,11(6), 112–122. [In Thai]
Tuntavanitch, P. and Jindasri, P. (2018). The real meaning of IOC. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 24(2), 3-12. [In Thai]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Wongsrikaew, N., and Sunalai, S. (2023). Technology acceptance in work performance of supporting staff at the operational level of Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Journal, 36(1), 23–35. [In Thai]