The Doctrine of Perception in Buddhism

Main Article Content

Mokesh Barua

Abstract

In the Indian classical epistemology major and, perhaps the most controversial
issue is the etymology of perception. Most of the Indian philosophical schools accept
perception as the primary means of knowledge, but differ on the nature, kinds, and objects
of perceptual knowledge. The Buddhist epistemology which is known as pramāna is the
study of right knowledge which is classified into two perception (pratyakṣa) and inference
(anumāna). Perception or pratyakṣa was declared as direct knowledge while anumāna was
understood as indirect knowledge.
The perceptual objects such as svabha, svalaksaṇa, self or the particular nature of the
object etc. and whether the external world truly exists or not—all these issues were crucially
debated, disputed during the period of Northern Main Buddhist stream or Nikāya Buddhism
within and out of the Buddhist schools. All these factors are indirectly and directly related
to the concept of perception. This paper will broadly focus on the doctrinal controversies
such as what can we know, and how we know it i.e. direct and indirect perception among
the different Buddhist schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Barua, M. (2019). The Doctrine of Perception in Buddhism. The Journal of International Association of Buddhist Universities (JIABU), 12(1), 276-282. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jiabu/article/view/216911
Section
Article

References

Anuruddha, Acariya. Trans. by Bhikkhu Bodhi (1993). A Comprehensive Manual of
Abhidhamma. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Dhammajoti, K. L. (2004). Abhidharma Doctrine and Controversy on Perception. Sri Lanka:
Center for Buddhist Studies.
Dhammajoti, K. L. (2002). Sarvastivada Abhidharma. Sri Lanka: Center for Buddhist Studies.
Bhatt, S. R. and Anu Mehotra (2000). Buddhist Epistemology. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Massaki H. (1999). Buddhist Theory of Perception. Journal of the American Oriental Society,
Vol. 119.
Zhihua Y. (2004). Dignāga. Four Types of Perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy. Vol. 32,
No. 1, pp. 57-79.
Matilal, B. K. (1986). Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mondal, P. K. (1982). Some aspects of perception in old Nyaya. Journal of Indian Philosophy,
10(4): 357–376.
Ibempishak Devi, L. (1999). A Study of Early Buddhism with Special Reference to Theravada
and Sarvastivada. Retrieved on 16 Jun 2019 from https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/
bitstream/10603/69729/9/09_chapter%205.pdf