Contemporary Art Access and Distribution Channels: A Case of Thai Undergraduate Student
Main Article Content
Abstract
The contemporary art market has witnessed substantial global growth since the 1990s, making access and distribution channels increasingly essential for emerging artists, including undergraduate art students. This study investigates whether differences in university rankings influence students’ preferences regarding contemporary art access and distribution channels. A quantitative research method was employed, utilizing a closed-ended questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. A total of 450 undergraduate art students from four Bangkok-based institutions—two top-ranking and two general universities—were selected through simple random sampling. Data were analyzed using independent sample t-tests to compare students’ preferences between the two groups. The findings reveal that students from both groups reported similar levels of access to various contemporary art channels, including public art centers, private galleries, mass media, websites, and social media platforms. However, notable differences were observed in distribution preferences: students from general universities showed significantly greater reliance on traditional channels such as public art centers, private galleries, mass media, and Facebook, whereas students from top-tier universities were more evenly distributed across traditional and online platforms. These findings highlight the continuing relevance of traditional art spaces while underscoring the growing importance of digital channels in contemporary art dissemination.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2018 by Asian Journal of Arts and Culture, Walailak University. All rights reserved.
References
Barron, P., & Leask, A. (2017). Visitor engagement at museums: Generation Y and ‘Lates’ events at the national museum of Scotland. Museum Management and Curatorship, 32(5), 473-490.
Blume, J. (2017). Exploring the potentials and challenges of virtual distribution of contemporary art (pp. 97-115). In Frömming, U. U., Köhn, S., Fox, S., & Terry, M. (Eds.). Digital environments: Ethnographic perspectives across global online and offline spaces. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
Bolat, K. E. (2021). Reading contemporary art: Comparative art history education through themes. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 92, 227-252.
Budge, K., & Burness, A. (2018). Museum objects and instagram: Agency and communication in digital engagement. Continuum, 32(2), 137-150.
Coskun Onan, B., Coskun, N., & Ersoy, A. (2021). The phenomenology of interdisciplinary content: Contemporary art course. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 19-50.
de Arriba, R., Girardi, G., & Vidagan, M. (2019). Contemporary art in higher education: Creative pedagogies in political economy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100577.
Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center, 11(2), 1-18.
Gross, J., & Pitts, S. E. (2016). Audiences for the contemporary arts: Exploring varieties of participation across art forms in Birmingham, UK. Participations, 13(1), 4-23.
Kelomees, R. (2019). From net art to post internet art: The cyclical nature of art movements (pp. 1-11). In Smite, R., & Smits, R. (Eds.). Virtualities and Realities: New Experiences, Art and Ecologies in Immersive Environments. Riga, Latvia: RIXC.
Kumjim, P. (2018). Thai identities as scened in twenty-first century contemporary Thai media art. Journal of Urban Culture Research, 16, 64-80.
Luckerhoff, J., & Falk, J. (2016). Museum education in a changing public landscape. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 39(3), 323-330.
Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European journal of education, 49(1), 45-59.
Mead, S. M., Ellerbrock, C. R., & Cruz, B. C. (2017). Discussing global issues through contemporary art. The Social Studies, 108(2), 72-77.
Meyer, R. (2013). What was contemporary art?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Scimago Institutions Ranking. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.scimagoir.com/rankings.php?sector=Higher+educ.&country=THA&area=1200
Sidorova, E. (2019). The cyber turn of the contemporary art market. Arts, 8(3), 84.
Smith, T. E. (2009). What is contemporary art? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Suess, A. (2018). Instagram and art gallery visitors: Aesthetic experience, space, sharing and implications for educators. Australian Art Education, 39(1), 107-122.
Weilenmann, A., Hillman, T., & Jungselius, B. (2013). Instagram at the museum: Communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing (pp. 1843-1852). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
Winkleman, E. (2015). Selling contemporary art: How to navigate the evolving market. New York, NY: Allworth Press