Contextualizing Culture in Practice: Between Cultural Relativism and Hermeneutic Understanding
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to contextualize culture in practice by initially problematizing the concept of culture with the question, “What does culture as given or culture as constructed mean?” It further delves into the issue by asking, “Why is this a problem?” and ultimately seeks to answer, “How can we resolve this problem?”, which entails the practical contextualization of culture. The focus of the paper is to challenge the notion of culture as either predetermined or constructed, employing the contrasting perspectives of Peter Winch and Martin Heidegger. Additionally, it examines the differences between cultural relativism and hermeneutics, featuring debates between Peter Winch and Clifford Geertz on cultural relativism, and Martin Heidegger and Ludwig Wittgenstein on hermeneutics. Finally, the paper discusses methodologies for contextualizing culture, whether perceived as given or constructed, in practical terms.
The insights provided by this paper are significant for several reasons. Firstly, it helps clarify the theoretical underpinnings of cultural analysis, offering a nuanced understanding of how culture can be perceived and interpreted. Secondly, it bridges the gap between theoretical debates and practical applications, providing scholars and practitioners with the tools to better navigate cultural contexts in their work. Lastly, the paper encourages a reflective and critical approach to cultural studies, promoting deeper engagement with the dynamic and constructed nature of culture.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2018 by Asian Journal of Arts and Culture, Walailak University. All rights reserved.
References
Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2001). Philosophy of Social Science. New York: Palgrave.
Bernasconi-Kohn, L. (2006). How not to think about rules and rule following. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 36 (1), 307-323.
Bosanquet, B. (1999). The philosophical theory of the state. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MTT Press.
Eliot, T. S. (1949). Christianity and culture: The Idea of a Christian society and notes towards the definition of culture. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the azande. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Fay, B. (1998). Contemporary philosophy of social science: A multicultural approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gadamer, H. G. (1965). The historicity of understanding. In Connerton, P. (Ed.). Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth. Misddlesex: Penguin Books.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1990). On ethnographic allegory (pp. 98-122). In Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Delhi, India: Oxford univ. press.
Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Griswold, W. (1987). The fabrication of meaning: Literary interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1077-1117.
Heidegger, M. (2002). The Worldhood of the world (pp. 288-307). In Moran, D., & Mooney, T. (Eds.). The phenomenology reader. London: Routledge.
Howarth, D. (2004). Towards a Heideggerian social science. Anthropological Theory, 4(2), 229-247.
Husserl, E. (2002). The way into phenomenological transcendental philosophy by inquiring back from the pregiven lifeworld (pp. 151-174). In Moran, D., & Mooney, T. (Eds.). The phenomenology reader. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Kanatham, S. (2021). Cultural politics in the history of longboat racing in Nan Province (Doctoral dissertation). Chiang Mai, Thailand: Chiang Mai University.
Kanatham, S. (2023). The invention of tradition in the context of globalization: A case study of Nan’s longboat racing festival. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 17(1), 117-131.
Kluckhohn, C. (2015). Mirror for Man - Understanding the Definition of Culture. Retrieved from http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=3735.
Kripke, S. A. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language: An elementary exposition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Harvard University Press.
Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions (Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University). Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.
Lueangaramsri, P. (2023). The womb of the nation: The disciplining of reproduction and the history of state and women’s sexuality in Thailand (in Thai). Bangkok, Thailand: Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre.
MacIntyre, A. (1967). Review of philosophy of social science by Richard Rudner, British, Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18, 344-345.
MacIntyre, A. (1967). The idea of a social science. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (P. 95-114). In MacIntyre, A. (Ed.). Against the self-images of the age: Essays on ideology and philosophy. London, United Kingdom: Duckworth.
MacIntyre, A. (1978). Rationality and the explanation of action (pp. 244-259). In MacIntyre, A. (Ed.). Against the self-images of the age: Essays on ideology and philosophy. London, United Kingdom: Duckworth.
MacIntyre, A. (1979). Review of rationality and the social sciences: Contributions to the philosophy and methodology of the social sciences, American Journal of Sociology, 85, 217-19.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: John W. Parker.
Mulhall, S. (1996). The human world: society, self, selfhood and self-interpretation. London: Routledge.
Rort, R. (1991). Essays on Heidegger and others: Philosophical papers (2nd eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Santasombat, Y. (2001). Power, space and ethnic identity: Cultural politics in the Thai nation-state. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Chiang Mai University.
Saul, A. K. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language: Elementary exposition. Massachusetts, United States: Harvard University Press.: Harvard University Press.
Schutz, A. (1963). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences (pp. 231-249). In Natanson, M. (Ed.). Philosophy of the social sciences: A reader. New York: Random House.
Soffer, G. (1999). Phenomenologizing with a Hammer: Theory or Practice? Continental Philosophy Review, 32, 379-393.
Turner, S. (2003). MacIntyre in the province of philosophy of social science Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Tylor, E. B. (1873). Primitive culture: Research into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom. (2nd eds.). London: John Murray.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Winch, P. (1970). The idea of a social science (pp. 1-17). In Wilson, B. (Ed.). Rationality. New York, United States: Harper & Row Publishers.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophy investigations (3rd eds.). New York: The Macmillan Company.
Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough (pp. 1-18). In Rhees, R. (Ed.). Norfolk, UK: The Brynmill Press.
Zeuner, L. (2003). Cultural sociology from concern to distance. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.