Public Participation in Epidemic Management of the Coronavirus 2019 of Government Agencies in Thap Yai Sub-district at Rattanaburi District of Surin Province

Abstract

This article aimed 1) To study the level of public participation in the management of the spread of the Coronavirus 2019 of government agencies in Thap Yai Subdistrict. Rattanaburi District Surin Province. 2) To compare public participation in the management of the spread of the Coronavirus 2019 by government agencies in Thap Yai Subdistrict. Rattanaburi District Surin Province. 3) To make recommendations by applying the principle of Sankhahavatthu 4 with public participation in the management of the spread of the Coronavirus 2019 of government agencies in Thap Yai Subdistrict. Rattanaburi District Surin Province. The research method is a combination of quantitative research and qualitative research. The quantitative research used a questionnaire with a confidence value of 0.80 on a sample population of 376 people. Statistics used in data analysis included frequency distribution, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. and one-way analysis of variance (One Way ANOVA) at the statistical significance level used in this research study was equal to 0.05 and qualitative research Using the method of studying documents In-depth interviews with 11 key informants/people. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive methods.

The research findings indicate that:

1. 1. To study the level of public participation in the management of the spread of the coronavirus 2019 by government agencies in Thap Yai Subdistrict. Rattanaburi District Surin Province was found to be overall at a moderate level (x ̅ = 3.17, S.D. = 0. 99).

2.Comparison of public participation in the management of the spread of coronavirus in 2019 (COVID-19) by public government agencies in Thab Yai Subdistrict. Rattanaburi District Surin Province Thailand, was found that, categorized by individual factors such as gender, age, and occupation, there were no significant differences. However, when categorized by education level, significant differences were observed, supporting the research hypothesis.

1. Decision making Community gatherings should be organized for the people. People should participate in helping to publicize it. Planning aspect A mechanism or channel should be created for people to participate in the preparation of prevention plans. Government agencies should coordinate in the matter of volunteers. in patient care. Receiving benefits Should provide knowledge and guidelines for living life during the coronavirus outbreak. The symptoms of infected patients should be monitored. Evaluation aspect People coming from other places should be followed up. Whether it is abroad or other provinces Should be screened well. Problems should be analyzed.