Design Major Teaching Management Reform in Private University of Guangdong Province
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study were: 1.To explore the factors affecting the reform of design major teaching for educational management in private universities in Guangdong Province.2.To formulating the reform plan of design major teaching for educational management in private universities in Guangdong Province.
This study adopted the mixed method of qualitative research and quantitative research. The total population consisted of about 680 full-time teachers and teaching administrators from 10 private universities design majors in Guangdong Province. The sample size was 248 according to the sample size scale developed by Krejcie and Morgan (1970). A quota sampling method was used to sample 248 full-time teachers and teaching administrators of design majors in private universities in Guangdong Province. The data collection tools included semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and discussion records of focus groups. The data obtained were mainly used for descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis.
The main results were as follows: 1. The main factors affecting the reform of design major teaching include four parts: 1.1 the quality management of teaching resources. 1.2 Teaching quality management of design specialty. 1.3 Design professional teacher quality management. 1.4 Design specialty basic education reform management. 2. The formulation to reform were: 2.1 The quality management of teaching in a large number of library materials and in line with international standard, update for the software, supervision for the laboratories, establish design studio environment for the combination of theory and practice. 2.2 The teaching quality management of ensure of student position in teaching activity, combined theory and practice, increase teacher –student communication ,logical thinking. 2.3 design professional teacher quality management for strengthen theoretical and practical, correct attitude and behaviour, strengthen tutoring, evaluate teacher’s learning experience. 2.4 run basic curriculum system, intergrated modern design to basic course.
Article Details
References
Ding, H. (2021, 3). The Enlightenment of Bauhaus education Model to modern design education. Beauty and The Times, pp. 120-122.
Guanzhong, L. (2021). Thoughts on Chinese industrial design. Jiangsu: China.Jiangsu Phoenix Art Publishing House.
Hara, K. (2017). Designing design. Guangxi Normal University Press.
He, J. (2023, 1). Research on the reform and development of Higher Education in the New Era. Journal of Heilongjiang Teacher Development Institute, pp. 1-3.
Huang, C. (2023, 2). Innovation thinking on teaching reform of design foundation based on professional competence standard of design industry. Western Leather, pp. 45-47.
Li, X. (2021, 9). Effective strategies to improve the quality of basic education of art design. Popular Literature and Art, pp. 176-177.
Liu, g. (2008). Comprehensive modeling design basis. Higher Education Press.
Matthias, G. t. (2006, 5 20). An "outsider"'s "inside" thinking. Art Newspaper.
Shi, L. (2018, 5). sing cross-border thinking to promote the innovation of design education in colleges and universities. Modern University Education, pp. 106-111.
Sun, G. (2006, 1). Curriculum environmental factors and their impact on curriculum reform. Educational Exploration, pp. 20-22.
Wang, S. (2002). History of world modern design. China Youth Publishing House.
Wang, Y. (2015, 11). Research on Curriculum system reform of Industrial design Basic education in engineering colleges. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, pp. 166-168.
Xiaoyong, Z. C. (2023, 1). Teaching Reform of Landscape design for Environmental design majors in universities. . Fine Arts Education Research, pp. 112-114.
Xiong, C. (2021, 11). Influence of art design teaching reform in the new era on school education management mode. Footwear Craft and Design, pp. 46-47.
Zhang, D. &. (2009, 5). The overall design and implementation of the basic education curriculum reform in Finland. Foreign Education Research, pp. 59-63.
Zhang, l. (2022, 7). University curriculum system optimization and "Design Basis" teaching reform. Education and teaching forum, pp. 61-64.
Zhao, X. (2014). Design basis, the formation of the design thinking in education. Hebei normal university.
Zheng, Y. &. (2021, 12). Based on the credit system in colleges and universities teaching management effectiveness factors and countermeasure analysis. The decision to explore, pp. 75-76.
Zong, M. (2008). Basis of three-dimensional design. Oriental publishing center.