The Impact of Hybrid Learning Mode on Chinese Language Proficiency and Engagement of International Students: a Study of Chinese as a Foreign Language Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the profound changes in the language learning environment driven by technology, and the increasingly prominent status of Chinese as a global language, it is necessary to
have an indepth understanding of the multifaceted impact of technology and language learning tools such as ClassIn on Chinese learnin.
This study aims to explore the effectiveness of Class-in in blended teaching for Chinese language skills (listening, reading, and writing), as well as to investigate the impact of engagement levels on language learning outcomes among second language learners of Chinese in a blended learning context.The research subjects were 95 Chinese language learning international students from a university in Yunnan province, China, using quantitative research methods. Research tools included pre-test and post-test scores for control and experimental groups, as well as an online engagement questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS26.0 for paired-sample t-tests and multiple linear regression. The results show that the hybrid teaching based on Classin is helpful to improve students' listening and reading level, while the traditional teaching about writing is more dominant. The improvement of students' listening, writing and reading is mainly due to students' independent participation in Classin teaching. The multi-modal function of Classin promotes the improvement of listening and writing, but interferes with reading learning. Peer involvement has no effect on blended learning. This study has important implications for Chinese language teachers, learners, linguists, school decision makers and classroom platform managers.
Article Details
References
Altieri, C. (2003). Towards an Expressivist Theory of the Affects. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 86 (1/2), 71-102.
Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(3), 101-108.
Bergdahl, N., & Hietajärvi, L. (2022). Social engagement in distance-, remote-, and hybrid learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(3), 315-342.
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2020). Factors underlying the perceived importance of online student engagement strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(2), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-02-2020-0045
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & López Pérez, M. V. (2014). Evaluation of a blended learning language course: students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 509-527.
Charlow, N. (2015). Prospects for an expressivist theory of meaning.
Chen, M. (2022). Digital affordances and teacher agency in the context of teaching Chinese as a second language during COVID-19. System, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. system. 2021.102710
Cook, V., & Cook, V. (1993). The input hypothesis model. Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, 51-68.
Di Mitri, D., Schneider, J., Specht, M., & Drachsler, H. (2018). From signals to knowledge: A conceptual model for multimodal learning analytics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 338-349.
East, M., & King, C. (2012). L2 learners' engagement with high stakes listening tests: Does technology have a beneficial role to play? CALICO Journal, 29(2), 208-223.
Ehsanifard, E., Ghapanchi, Z., & Afsharrad, M. (2020). The Impact of Blended Learning on Speaking Ability and Engagement. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17(1), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.17.253
Elbow, P. (2015). “PERSONAL WRITING” AND “EXPRESSIVISM” AS PROBLEM TERMS. PERSPECTIVES ON WRITING, 15.
Eliveria, A., Serami, L., Famorca, L., & Cruz, J. D. (2019). Investigating students’ engagement in a hybrid learning environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(2), 129-141.
Giannakos, M., & Cukurova, M. (2023). The role of learning theory in multimodal learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Gilakjani, A. P., Ismail, H. N., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of multimodal learning models on language teaching and learning. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 1(10).
Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: A review of research and discussion of implications. The Amer. Jrnl. of Distance Education, 23(2), 88-103.
Huang, R., Tlili, A., Wang, H., Shi, Y., Bonk, C. J., Yang, J., & Burgos, D. (2021). Emergence of the Online-Merge-Offline (OMO) Learning Wave in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Pilot Study. Sustainability, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063512
Hussein Alsowayegh, N., Jameel Bardesi, H., Ibrahim, G., & Sipra, M. (2019). Engaging students through blended learning activities to augment listening and speaking. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL(5).
Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). The effect of the online and offline blended teaching mode on English as a foreign language learners’ listening performance in a Chinese context. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 742742.
Klimova, B. F., & Kacetl, J. (2015). Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 477-481.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual review of applied linguistics, 15, 108-124.
Leach, L. (2000). Self-directed learning: Theory and practice
Liu, D. (2015). A critical review of Krashen’s input hypothesis: Three major arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4), 139-146.
Liu, Y. C., Lee, W. C., Huang, T. H., & Hsieh, H. M. . (2012). Improving Students' Chinese Writing Abilities with the" Conditioned Writing System. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 189-201.
Lu, Y. (2017). 2 Exploring the criterion-validity of HSK Levels 3 and 4. Teaching and learning Chinese in higher education: Theoretical and practical Issues, 35.
McLeod, S. (2011). Albert Bandura's social learning theory. Simply Psychology. London.
Nafik, A. A. (2022). The Use of Padlet Application to Teach Writing in Hybrid Learning: A Reflection of Online Teaching in Pandemic Era. The Proceedings of English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT), 11, 20-28.
Norazmi, D., Dwee, C., Suzilla, J., & Nurzarina, A. (2017). Exploring student engagement in writing using the flipped classroom approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 25(2), 663-674.
Ozcelik, H. N., Van den Branden, K., & Van Steendam, E. (2023). Listening comprehension problems of FL learners in a peer interactive, self-regulated listening task. International Journal of Listening, 37(2), 142-155.
Peng, Y., Yan, W., & Cheng, L. (2021). Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK): A multi-level, multi-purpose proficiency test. Language Testing, 38(2), 326-337.
Ranganathan, S., Negash, S., & Wilcox, M. V. (2007). Hybrid learning: Balancing face-to-face and online class sessions.
Sari, I. F., Rahayu, A., Apriliandari, D. I., & Sulisworo, D. (2018). Blended learning: Improving students' motivation in English teaching learning process. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 6(1), 163-170.
Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of interactive online learning, 6(1), 27-42.
Sümer, Ö., Goldberg, P., D’Mello, S., Gerjets, P., Trautwein, U., & Kasneci, E. (2023). Multimodal Engagement Analysis From Facial Videos in the Classroom. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(2), 1012-1027. https://doi.org/10.1109/ taffc.2021.3127692
Tandiana, S. T., Abdullah, F., & Saputra, Y. (2020). Learning multimodality through genre-based multimodal texts analysis: Listening to students’ voices. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(2), 101-113.
Teng, Y. (2017). Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK): Past, Present, and Future. In Chinese as a Second Language Assessment (pp. 3-19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4089-4_1
Verhoeven, L., Reitsma, P., & Siegel, L. S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition. Reading and writing, 24, 387-394.
Wang, C., Sun, Y., Lin, Q., Cao, R., & Che, Y. (2022). Online Teaching Platform of Design Thinking Workshop. Ergonomics in Design, 47, 22-29.
Wang, D., & Huang, Y. (2022). Internet-mediated joint construction: engaging second language learners in synchronous online writing instruction through classin. Relc Journal, 00336882221090278.
Wang, D., & Huang, Y. (2022, 2022 May). Internet-Mediated Joint Construction: Engaging Second Language Learners in Synchronous Online Writing Instruction Through ClassIn [Article; Early Access]. Relc Journal, 11, Article 00336882221090278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221090278
Whitney, S. D., & Bergin, D. A. (2018). Students’ motivation and engagement predict reading achievement differently by ethnic group. The Journal of genetic psychology, 179(6), 357-370.
Xu, Y., Jin, L., Deifell, E., & Angus, K. (2021). Chinese character instruction online: A technology acceptance perspective in emergency remote teaching. System, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102542
Yussof, Y. M., Jamian, A. R., Roslan, S., Hamzah, Z. A. Z., & Kabilan, M. K. (2012). Enhancing reading comprehension through cognitive and graphic strategies: A constructivism approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 151-160.
Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102.
Zhao, L. X. e. a. (2020). Comparing Face-to-face and Online Teaching of Written and Spoken Chinese to Adult Learners: An Edinburgh-Sheffield Case Study. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijclt.2020.06.05