The Factors of Digital Leadership Affected Administrative Effectivenessof Online Art Education at Educational Institution inBeijing

Main Article Content

Sun Wen

Abstract

           With the rapid development of digital technology and Internet applications, the scale of online education has also expanded, and art education is also showing such a trend. Clearly, more research is needed to improve the effectiveness of online learning. This is likely to provide educators and policymakers with ideas for designing future innovations in arts education. For this reason, this study aims to examine in detail how digital leadership factors affect the effectiveness of online arts education, using online arts education institutions in Beijing as an example.The factors of the study were  the components of the digital leadership and administrative effectiveness of online art education in Beijing. and propose Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of factors affecting administrative effectiveness of online art education in Beijing,and finally investigate the factors influencing for improving the effectiveness of online art education in Beijing.The research method adopts a mixed research method, including qualitative and quantitative research methods. The population were teachers and staffs of educational institution in Beijing. The total number were 1482 persons, and the respondent used for the study were 310 by G*Power software. The key informants for semi-structure interviews were 5 experts. The instruments used foe data collection were data record form; semi structured interview form and five-points rating scale questionnaire. Questionnaires have been received at the response rate of 100%. The statistic used for analyzing the data were descriptive statistics, CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis and SEM (Structural Equation Model). The results of this research were found that there were 5 factors affecting the effectiveness of digital leadership in online art education in Beijing. The most important were Digital Technology Literacy, The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of factors affecting the effectiveness of digital leadership in online art education in Beijing was fit with the empirical data by the value of Relative Chi-square = 216.091, Relative Chi-square = 0.965, GFI = 0.941, AGFI = 0.928, TLI = 1.003, RMR = 0.068, and RMSEA = 0.000. These indices suggest that the model fits the data well, supporting the specified relationships. According to the results of the research analysis, the conclusion is that only one factor, digital technology literacy, has a statistically significant direct impact on the effectiveness of digital leadership in online arts education in Beijing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wen, S. . (2024). The Factors of Digital Leadership Affected Administrative Effectivenessof Online Art Education at Educational Institution inBeijing. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 9(12), 416–428. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jomld/article/view/276022
Section
Research Article

References

Antonopoulou, Hera; Halkiopoulos, Constantinos; Barlou, Olympia; &Beligiannis, Grigorios N. (2021) Associations between Traditional and Digital Leadership in Academic Environment: During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, August 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353631651.

Andi Mariano Sabar(June 25 2023).The Influence of School Management Information Systems and Teacher’s Social Competence on the Parent Satisfaction of Junior High School Students. Futurity Education Volume 3 (2), Pages 75-98, https:// doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.06.25.05

Baurzhan Bokayev; Zulfiya Torebekova; Zhuldyz Davletbayeva; &Fatima Zhakypova (2021).Distance learning in Kazakhstan: estimating parents’ satisfaction of educational quality during the coronavirus.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27-39. Published online: 10 Jan 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475 939X.2020. 1865192

Berry Barnett (2019). Teacher leadership: Prospects and promises.The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 100, No. 7, April 2019, pp. 49-55. https://www.j stor.org/stable/ 26677373.

Claassen, Kevin; dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil; Kettschau, Jan; Broding, &Horst Christoph (2021). How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 16:44. https://doi.org/10. 1186/s12995-021-00335-x.

Chen C. C. (2022). Factors influencing the information leadership of school principals: A study [Master's thesis, East China Normal University].

Dai Ruihua, Zhang Lili.(2019). Principal information governance Ability: Connotation, core elements and Improvement strategies. Teacher Education Research.

Emma Sabzalieva; Jaime Roser; &Takudzwa Mutize (2023). The impact of self-regulation in the governance of European higher education systems on quality and equity.Hungarian Educational Research Journal 13 (2023) 1, 23–46.

Elisabeth E. Bennett & Rochell R. McWhorter (2021). Virtual HRD’s Role in Crisis and the Post Covid-19 Professional Lifeworld: Accelerating Skills for Digital Transformation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 23 (1) 5–25.

Evan Rhinesmith (2019) A review of the research on parent satisfaction in private school choice programs. School Choice: Separating Fact from Fiction, 1st Edition, Routledge, eBook ISBN: 9780429020414

Feng Xiaoying. (2022, December 1). Enhancing Teachers' Information Technology Teaching Competence Requires Restructuring Teaching Models. China Education Daily.

Hera Antonopoulou, Constantinos Halkiopoulos, Olympia Barlou,& Grigorios N. Beligiannis (2021). Transformational Leadership and Digital Skills in Higher Education Institutes: During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Emerging Science Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, February, 2021.

Lan Yang, Ming Ming Chiu & Zi Yan (2021). The power of teacher feedback in affecting student learning and achievement: insights from students’ perspective, Educational Psychology.

Lei, L., Zhang, Z., & Jin, Y. (2021). The Evolution and Enhancement Model of Principal's Information Leadership in the Era of Educational Informatization 2.0. Journal of Distance Education.

Li Yi, &Zhang Jianqing (2022) - “The Road and Enlightenment of Informatization Leadership Improvement of American Education Leaders - A qualitative analysis based on the ‘Education Technology Standards for American Education Leaders’,” Teacher Development Research, Issue 2, 2022, Pages 116-124.

Mohamed Ally (2019). Competency Profile of the Digital and Online Teacher in Future Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20 (2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4206

Natalia A. &Lyz, Oksana N. Istratova (2023). Online Educational Activities of Students: Readiness and Self-Efficacy. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 2023, 8 (2), 176-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/joltida

Qian Songling (2017) - “Learning Transform in Digital Age-A Review on International Society for Technology in Education 2017 Conference & Expo,” China’s Electronic Education, 2017, No. 10, Pages 23-31.

Samuel Abramovich, & Mark McBride (2018). Open education resources and perceptions of financial value.” The Internet and Higher Education 39, 33–38.

Schwarzmüller, Tanja; Brosi, Prisca; Duman, Denis; &Welpe, Isabell M. (2018). How Does the Digital Transformation Affect Organizations? Key Themes of Change in Work Design and Leadership.Management Revue, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 114-138. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26491473.

Stefani Milovanska-Farrington (2021). Education in the times of a pandemic: parental socioeconomic characteristics and time spent educating children.Journal of Economic Studies. Article publication date: 27 May 2021. Issue publication date: 6 May 2022.

Tsurkan M.V., Liubarskaia M.A.& Silchenko A.P. (2020). Integration of Monitoring Systems in the Public Administration of the Region Under the Conditions of Technological Transformation.Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 138.

Wang Jingying, &Zhou Danhua (2022) - “Research on digital competence of international teachers: conceptual framework, influence mechanism and practice approach,” Teacher development research, 2022, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Pages 105-115.

Wang Yue, &Wang Baofu (2020) - “How to act on the informatization leadership of open universities under the wave of ‘Internet +’ education,” Digital Education, 2020, No. 2 (Total No. 32), Theoretical Exploration Column, Pages 33-37.

Yue Fang (2019) - “Digital Leadership,” EU-China Frontier Perspectives Series, The Eastern Publishing Center, ISBN 9787547315545.

Yu Xiaoya, Zhang Xiangling,& Li Ni (2023) - “Policies, practices and inspirations to improve teachers’ digital learning ability in the United States,” China Information Technology Education, No. 18, 2023, Pages 87-90.

Zhong, L. (2017). “The Effectiveness of K-12 Principal’s Digital Leadership in Supporting and Promoting Communication and Collaboration Regarding CCSS Implementation.” Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 10 (2), 55-77. Southern Illinois University.

Zhang Yanling, Chen Dinglei, &Zhao Ruibin (2021) - “Typical model, current situation and development trend of online teaching,” Digital Education, 2021, No. 6, Total No. 42, Theoretical Exploration Column, Pages 16-23.

Zhu Zhiting, &Hu Jiao (2022, G40-58) - “Digital leadership affects the value tendency and practical process of digital transformation of education,” focusing on organizational and technical leadership aspects.