Spatial Prepositions in Motion-Related Events: a Case Study of English and Thai

Main Article Content

Vilaivan Aroonmanakun


This paper discusses how motion events are coded in the two languages, namely English and Thai, in the presence of spatial prepositions. Meanwhile it offers evidence to substantiate the claim that a movement reading is derived from other sentential elements rather than the conventional meaning of a preposition. The study focuses on a marginal case where prepositions of containment in English and Thai “in”and “naj”, albeit denoting primarily a location of an action, are deliberately used in a sentence expressing a motion event. It is found in both languages that a movement reading is not arbitrary but, rather, is assigned by some sentential elements specific to each language, emphasizing the way a particular language has for its meaning representation.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details



Brugman, C. 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland Press.

Brugman, C. and Lakoff, G. 1988. “Cognitive topology and lexical networks.” In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, S. Small, G. Cottrell, and M. Tanenhaus (eds.), pp.477–507. Palo Alto, CA.: Morgan Kaufman.

Diller, Anthony V. N. 2006. Thai serial verbs: Cohesion and culture. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and R. W. Dixon (eds.) Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, pp.160-177. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Groupen, J., S. Pinker, M. Hollander, R. Goldberg, and R. Wilson. 1989. The Learnability and Acquisition of the dative Alternation in English. Language 65: 203-257.

Herskovits, Anette. 1986 Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Herskovits, Anette. 1988. Spatial Expressions and the Plasticity of Meaning. In B. Rudzka- Ostyn (ed.). Topics in Cognitive Cognitive Linguistics , pp. 271-298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Kreitzer, A. 1997. Multiple levels of schematization: A Study in the conceptualization of space. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 291–325.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press

Martín Gavilanes, M. A. 2000. A cognitive approach to the polysemy of ‘through’. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 8: 11-38.

Radden, Günter and René Dirven. 2007. Cognitive English Grammar [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Sandra, D. 1998. What linguists can and can't tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 361–378.

Sinha, C. and T. Kuteva. 1995. Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18: 167–199.
Taylor, J. 2007. Ten Lectures on Applied Cognitive Linguistics. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press

Thepkanjana, Kingkarn. 1986. Serial Verb Constructions in Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

Thepkanjana, KingKarn and Satoshi Uehara. 2008. Directional Verbs as Success Markers in Thai :Another Grammaticalization Path In The Tai-Kadai Languages edited by Anthony V.N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmondson and Yongxian Luo, London ;New York : Routledge, 2008.

Tyler, A. & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions : spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tyler, A. and Evans, V. 2001. “Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over.” Language 77: 724–765.

Tyler, V. E. A. (2005). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Pedagogical Grammar: The English Prepositions of Verticality. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada 5(2): 11-42.

Vandeloise, C. 1991. Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study in French. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Vandeloise, C. 1994. Methodology and analyses of the preposition in. Cognitive Linguistics 5: 157–184.