Discourse of Heteronormativity in the U.S.: A Case of March for Marriage 2014 and 2015

Main Article Content

Patthanan Dokmai
Savitri Gadavanij

Abstract

This paper explores heteronormative discourse on the issue of same sex marriage (SSM) legalization in the U.S. The aim is to investigate heteronormative ideology in anti-SSM discourse. Data are eight anti-SSM speeches delivered in the March for Marriage event, held in 2014 and 2015 in the U.S. The speeches are collected from the YouTube channel: NationForMarriage. Regarding the study of van Dijk (2004), discourse of discrimination is one kind of ideological manifestation in the form of text, talk, and communication. Thus, this proposition is adopted to find and examine the main characteristics of this heteronormative discourse. Findings reveal that homosexuality or the LGBTQI group is not explicitly mentioned in discriminatory manner. Instead the speech presents heterosexuality as the only natural form of union justified by the words of God in conformity with the natural duty of human reproduction. Additionally, the discourse presented heterosexuals as victims of the legalization and pointed fingers at the authorities and media as those responsible for the threat.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Crossley, N. (2005). Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory. Sage.

Elia, J. P. (2003). Queering relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 45(2-4), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v45n02_03

Eyerman, R. (1981). False consciousness and ideology in Marxist theory. Acta Sociologica, 24(1-2), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169938102400104

Gibbons, M. T., Coole, D. H., Ellis, E., & Ferguson, K. (Eds.). (2015). The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (Vol.3). Wiley.

Habarth, J. M. (2008). Thinking “straight”: Heteronormativity and associated outcomes across sexual orientation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. Deep Blue. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/60664

Harris, J., & White, V. (2018). A dictionary of social work and social care (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Herz, M., & Johansson, T. (2015). The Normativity of the concept of heteronormativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(8), 1009-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1021631

Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the past: Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kalekin-Fishman, D. (2008). `False Consciousness': How `Ideology' Emerges from the Encounter of Body Practices and Hegemonic Ideas. Current Sociology, 56(4), 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108090941

Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477-498. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477

Mott, L., Michels, E., & Paulinho (2017). Mortes violentas de Lgbt no Brasil relatório 2017. Grupo Gay Da Bahia. https://grupogaydabahia.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/relatorio-2017.pdf

NationForMarriage. (2014a, June 23). Alison Howard Marriage March 2014 [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyDLLvZ3TKw&list=PLSOTDMqj_f6Uuom9e5HVsNfGLawRHPc9j&index=24

NationForMarriage. (2014b, June 23). Brian Brown Marriage March 2014 [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_5bl3zsiY8&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=4

NationForMarriage. (2014c, June 23). Jeff Bell Marriage March [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42U_I_SUy3M&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=8

NationForMarriage. (2014d, June 23). Jennifer Marshall Marriage March [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OF-iaXFAWIY&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=7

NationForMarriage. (2015a, May 18). Cathy Ruse, Family Research Council [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqUK3IsXCm4&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=2

NationForMarriage. (2015b, May 18). Mat Staver, Chairman of Liberty Council [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l_CyrgtHtY&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=6

NationForMarriage. (2015c, May 18). Rev. Bill Owens Sr., Founder and President of CAAP [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHot7NkIDks&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=5

NationForMarriage. (2015d, May 18). Rev. Fr. Johannes (Hans) Jacobse, Orthodox Church [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i33fMv8ukd0&list=PLBP6VGhyEWaV7kPMryhkFMx27j85KSyCQ&index=3

Peterson, D. (2011). Neoliberal homophobic discourse: Heteronormative human capital and the exclusion of queer citizens. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(6-7), 742-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.581918

Reingardė, J. (2010). Heteronormativity and silenced sexualities at work. Kultūra ir visuomenė: socialinių tyrimų žurnalas, 1(1), 83-96.

Rojas-Lizana, I. (2011). Justifying and condemning sexual discrimination in everyday discourse: Letters to the Editor in the Australian local press. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.007

Simon, R. (2015). Gramsci’s political thought: An introduction (3rd ed.). Lawrence & Wishart.

van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the Denial of Racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005

van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Ideological discourse analysis. In E. Ventola & A. John (Eds.), New courant 4: Special Issue Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis, 135-161. University of Helsinki Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Racist discourse. In E. Cashmore (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Race and Ethnic Studies (pp. 351-355). Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Williams, G. A. (1960). The concept of “Egemonia” in the thought of Antonio Gramsci: Some notes on interpretation. Journal of the History of Ideas, 21(4), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708106