Reimagining Nature Writing
Trauma, Healing, and the Aesthetic of Relinquishment in Richard Powers’ Bewilderment and Shelby Van Pelt’s Remarkably Bright Creatures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THTS.45.1.2Keywords:
ecocriticism; nature writing; Richard Powers; Shelby Van Pelt; contemporary American literatureAbstract
Drawing upon Lawrence Buell’s concept of the “aesthetic of relinquishment” (1995), this article examines the legacy of nature writing in Richard Powers’ Bewilderment (2021) and Shelby Van Pelt’s Remarkably Bright Creatures (2022). I position these contemporary fictions of sci-fi and magical realism within the narrative prose tradition and extend criticism of nature writing beyond the traditional autobiographical framework. My analysis reveals that three core elements of nature writing—natural history, spiritual autobiography and travel writing (Scheese, 2002)—form the foundation of the protagonists’ journeys, particularly their processes of relinquishing material possessions and egocentric selves. In Bewilderment, the protagonist’s trauma, ecological knowledge and engagement with Buddhist philosophy enable his gradual relinquishment of the egocentric self. Similarly, Remarkably Bright Creatures portrays a protagonist whose extended sense of self—fostered by her bond with Marcellus, a giant Pacific octopus—facilitates her emotional healing. Ultimately, I contend that both protagonists’ transformations into ecocentric selves prompts actions which safeguard the natural world, thereby rendering the abstract concept of the “aesthetic of relinquishment” concrete. As a whole, my analysis underscores how contemporary narrative prose not only inherits but also reinvents the legacy of nature writing, illustrating its relevance to trauma, environmental consciousness and personal healing.
References
Bee, R. J. (2007). Climate change and global warming. Great Decisions, 17–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43682466
Buell, L. (1995). The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing, and the formation of American culture. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674262423
Caracciolo, M. (2020). We-narrative and the challenges of nonhuman collectives. Style, 54(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.5325/style.54.1.0086
Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, Article 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434
Geaves, R. (2006). Key words in religious studies. Continuum.
Gifford, T. (2020). Pastoral (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647920
Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
Gomez, L. O. (1978). Karunabhavana: Notes on the meaning of Buddhist compassion. The Tibet Journal, 3(2), 33–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43299900
Heyne, E. (1987). Toward a theory of nonfiction. Modern Fiction Studies, 33(3), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.0.1150
Heyne, E. (2001). Where fiction meets nonfiction: Mapping a rough terrain. Narrative, 9(3), 322–333. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20107261
Horwitz, R. P. (2004). Americans’ problem with global warming. American Studies, 45(1), 5-37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40643616
Hume, K. (2013). Moral problematics in the novels of Richard Powers. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2012.681324
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Morrow, B., & Powers, R. (2018). An interview with Richard Powers. Conjunctions, 70, 53–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26497858
Murphy, P. D. (2000). Farther afield in the study of nature-oriented literature. University of Virginia Press.
Narayana, S., & Dasai, H. (2022). [Review of Bewilderment, by R. Powers]. English Academy Review, 39(1), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10131752.2022.2110176
Powers, R. (2018). The overstory: A novel. W.W. Norton & Company.
Powers, R. (2021). Bewilderment: A novel. W.W. Norton & Company.
Roorda, R. (1997). Nature/writing: Literature, ecology, and composition. JAC, 17(3), 401–414. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20866150
Scheese, D. (2002). Nature writing: The pastoral impulse in America. Twayne Publishers.
Suvin, D. (1988). Positions and presuppositions in science fiction. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08179-0
Thomas, S. P. (2023). Global boiling: Implications for mental health. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 44(9), 797–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2023.2244338
Thompson, C. (2011). Travel writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816240
Thoreau, H. D. (2008). Walden. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1854) https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199538065.001.0001
Trexler, A. (2013). Integrating agency with climate critique. symplokē, 21(1-2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.5250/symploke.21.1-2.0221
Van Pelt, S. (2022). Remarkably bright creatures. Ecco.
Warnes, C. (2009). Magical realism and the postcolonial novel: Between faith and irreverence. Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230234437
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff.
