Another Definition of Speaking Ability and Another Categorization of Communication Strategies

Authors

  • Korapin Paranapiti
  • Punchalee Wasanasomsithi

Abstract

This paper aims to reconsider the definition of English speaking ability and what is entailed in assisting language teachers to plan how to enhance the speaking ability of students who use English as a foreign language as well as in assisting learners to develop their speaking ability. The paper first discusses the importance of speaking ability and reviews how the skill has been taught. A survey of the relevant literature on speaking ability is presented before an alternative definition of speaking ability is proposed. Further, the paper focuses on communication strategies with a review of related literature after which an alternative categorization of communication strategies is proposed with special attention given to achievement strategies. It is hoped that by reading the paper, EFL teachers will be motivated to integrate communication strategies in their language instruction so as to develop EFL learners’ speaking ability.

Author Biographies

Korapin Paranapiti

Korapin Paranapiti, PhD, is a full-time English instructor in the Department of Foreign Languages at the Faculty of Humanities, Kasetsart University, Bangkhen Campus. She is interested in strategy instruction, learning strategies, communication strategies, confident L2 use, and multiple intelligences.

Punchalee Wasanasomsithi

Punchalee Wasanasomsithi holds a doctorate in Language Education from Indiana University, U.S.A. She has been teaching EFL to undergraduate and graduate students at the Language Institute of Chulalongkorn University for more than two decades and is currently the director of the English as an International Language Program of Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University. Her areas of research interest include language acquisition, learning strategies, and learning and assessment literacy.

References

Ali, Z. (2008). Speaking skills in the ESL classroom - from acquisition to participation. Retrieved from http://ezinearticles.com/?Speaking-Skills-in-the-ESL-Classroom---From-Acquisition-to-Participation&id=1052583.

Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.

Bailey, K.M. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Speaking. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Canale, M. (1983). From Communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and Communication, 2-27. London: Longman.

Dornyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 55-85.

Dornyei, Z., & Scott, M.L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173-210.

Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1991). Strategic competence and how to teach it. ELT Journal, 45(1), 16-23.

Ellis, R. (1984). Communication strategies and the evaluation of communicative performance. ELT Journal, 38(1), 39-44.

Grognet, A.G. (1997). Integrating employment skills into adult ESL instruction.Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED409748).

Kendall, S., Jarvie, D.S., Doll, J., Lin, G.H.C., & Purcell, J.A. (2005). An overview of communication strategy. Online Submission, 31(2), 113-128.

Lee, Y. A. (2006). Towards respecification of communicative competence: Condition of L2 instruction or its objective? Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 349-376.

Lifang, Q. (1997). On teaching language strategic competence. Retrieved from http://www.fjlcyz.com/Article/class6/class6_4/class6_4_2/200608/5747.html.

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Mackenzie, A.S. (2002). EFL curriculum reform in Thailand. Paper presented at the 1st Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference, Kyoto, Japan.

Manchon, R.M. (2000). Fostering the autonomous use of communication strategies in the foreign language classroom. Links & Letters, 7(27), 13-27.

Mariani, L. (1994). Developing strategic competence: Towards autonomy in oral interaction. Perspectives, 20(1), 41-57.

Nakatani, Y. (2010). Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners' oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 116-136.

National Capital Language Resource Center. (n.d.). Goal: Communicative competence. Retrieved from http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/goalsmethods/goal.htm.

Nazari, A. (2007). EFL teachers' perception of the concept of communicative competence. ELT journal, 61(3), 202-210.

Paribakht, T. (1985). Strategic competence and language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 132-146.

Pillar, G.W. (2012). A framework for testing communicative competence. Retrieved from http://www.theroundtable.ro/Current/Language/Granville_Pilar_Framework_for_Testing_Communicative_Competence.pdf.

Rababah, G.A. (2002). Strategic competence and language teaching. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED472697).

Savignon, S.J. (1976). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED135245).

Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning: Introduction to a general theory. Oxford, England: University Press Oxford.

Thailand 2012: The year of English speaking. (2011). Retrieved fromhttp://thailand.prd.go.th

/view_news.php?id=6053&a=4.

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Essex, England: Pearson Education.

Wongsothorn, A., Hiranburana, K., & Chinnawongs, S. (2002). English language teaching in Thailand today. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 107-116.

Wood, J. (2011). Communicative language teaching (CLT) and communication strategies (CSs): Theory and practice. Teachers Helping Teachers, 11, 231-243.

Published

2015-01-01

Issue

No. 1 (2015): Thoughts 2015

Section

Articles

License

Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.

Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.

All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff.