Main Article Content
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff.
Becher, T., & Paul, R. T. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62, 428-446.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (2009). Writing in the disciplines: Research evidence for specificity. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1(1), 5-22.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 1-10.
Li, Y. (2011). A genre analysis of English and Chinese research article abstracts in linguistics and chemistry. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, San Diego State University.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd Ed.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Orasan, C. (2001). Patterns in scientific abstracts. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, pp. 433-443.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250.
Samraj, B. (2002). Disciplinary variation in abstracts: The case of wildlife behavior and conservation biology. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 40-56). Harlow: Longman.
Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481-499.
Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84-99.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tseng, F. P. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27-39.
Zhangsirikul, W. (2012). A study of moves in research article abstracts in the field of English language teaching. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Language Institute, Thammasat University.