Main Article Content
Modern universities have gone through a process of transformation characterised by marketisation and commercial orientation. Studies in the education literature have been critical about this change, raising concerns over the impact of business ideology and practices on the operation and identity of universities as education institutions. Research in critical discourse analysis has approached this phenomenon through the lens of discourse. However, critical discourse studies are often based on small data sets and do not compare university discourse with business discourse to investigate one of their main claims that university discourse will become more similar to business discourse.This paper compares 4-word lexical bundles in job advertisements produced by universities and businesses, using corpus linguistic methodology and critical discourse analysis. The results indicate that while lexical bundles in these two data sets have a different emphasis, some lexical bundles are used for self-promotion and job-selling. Further investigation into these lexical bundles shows that they are embedded in larger phraseological patterns which are employed to portray a desirable organisational image and job position, indicating a commercially oriented nature of university discourse.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). “If you look at”: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London/New York. London and New York: Longman.
CDBU. (2013). Council for the defence of British universities. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://cdbu.org.uk/.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002002.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
GNU. (2010). GNU Wget. Retrieved November 10, 2010, from http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/.
Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S. (2008). Starting with the small words patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(3), 271–295.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21.
Kheovichai, B. (2014). Marketization in the language of UK university recruitment: A critical discourse analysis and corpus comparison of university and finance industry job advertisements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK.
Mahlberg, M. (2007). Clusters, key clusters and local textual functions in Dickens. Corpora, 2(1), 1–31.
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the market society: critical reflections on discourse and dominance. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Mayr, A. (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London and New York: Continuum.
Morrish, L., & Sauntson, H. (2013). “Business-facing motors for economic development”: An appraisal analysis of visions and values in the marketised UK university. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(April 2013), 37–41. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17405904.2012.736698.
Rayson, P. (2011). Log-likelihood Calculator. Retrieved May 25, 2011, from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html.
Ritchie, D. (2002). Monastery or economic enterprise : Opposing or complementary metaphors of higher education ? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 45–55. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1701.
Sauntson, H., & Morrish, L. (2011). Vision, values and international excellence: the “products” that university mission statements sell to students. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer (pp. 73–85). London and New York: Routledge.
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools version 5, Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The John Hopkin University Press.
Teo, P. (2007). The Marketisation of higher education : A comparative case-study of two universities in Singapore. Critical Approach to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 1(1), 95–111.
Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a post-welfare society. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage Publications.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications Limited.