Behind the Scenes: A Study of Denial and Hypocrisy in Ian McEwan’s AMSTERDAM

Main Article Content

Darintip Chansit

Abstract

This article examines the novel Amsterdam (1998) by British novelist Ian McEwan which depicts the denial of the main characters, Clive Linley and Vernon Halliday. The denial stems from the disparity between the glorious past and their present failures, which the characters are unable to accept. Nevertheless, they try to show everyone that they still maintain the qualities that distinguished them in their youth and salvage their careers which seem to be on the declining end. Moreover, the novel is analyzed in terms of its portrayal of the hypocrisy of the upper circle in British society, with specific references to the period of British politics when Prime Minister John Major led. The theoretical framework of the analysis relies on the theories of denial asserted by Stanley Cohen in the book States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. The article aims to point out the traits and mechanisms of denial presented both by the characters and the story’s atmosphere, as well as the hypocritical nature and the resulting denial of society portrayed in the novel. The analysis will show that the main characters in Amsterdam are unable to cope with the present decline of their status and thus resort to remaining in denial and using unscrupulous means in order to regain their previous glory. At the same time, along with Cohen’s theory that denial is prevalent in both personal and sociological spheres, the article will reflect on similar traits of denial found in the social context of the novel as well.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Darintip Chansit

Darintip Chansit is a lecturer at the Deparment of English, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University where she graduated with an MA in English. Her academic interests include twentieth-century British and American novels and poetry. Her Master’s thesis is a psychohistorical analysis of Ian McEwan’s The Cement Garden, Atonement and Amsterdam.

References

Brannigan, John. Orwell to the Present: Literature in England 1945-2000. London: Palgrave, 2003.

“Cameron’s Tribute to Editor with ‘Flair and Integrity’ William Rees-Mogg”. Press Gazette. 30 December 2012. Web. 15 Oct. 2012.

Childs, Peter. Contemporary Novelists: British Fiction Since 1970. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

---, ed. The Fiction of Ian McEwan. London: Palgrave, 2006. Print.

Cohen, Stanley. States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity, 2001.

Deuze, Mark. “What is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered”. Journalism 6.4 (2005): 442-464. Web. 20 April 2012.

Groes, Sebastian. “A Cartography of the Contemporary: Mapping Newness in the Work of Ian McEwan.” Ian McEwan: Contemporary Critical Perspectives. Ed. Sebastian Groes. London: Continuum, 2009.

Harris, Keith. “Stephen Milligan: Accident or Murder and the Unanswered Questions”. Newsmedianews. 1999. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.

Head, Dominic. The Cambridge Introduction to Modern British Fiction 1950-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.

Henry, Patrick. Rev. of Amsterdam; Atonement; Saturday; On Chesil Beach all by Ian McEwan. Modern Language Studies 2008: 75-84 Web. 23 April 2012.

Higgins, Michael. “British Newspapers Today.” The Cambridge Companion to Modern British Culture. Ed. Michael Higgins, Clarissa Smith and John Storey. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010.

“John Major: A Life in Politics.” BBC News World Edition 28 Sep. 2002. Web. 20 Oct. 2012.

Koloze, Jeff. “Bizarre Fiction on the Right-to-Left Issues.” Life and Learning X. San Francisco, CA: University Faculty for Life, 2000. Web. 12 Oct. 2012.

“Lord Newton of Braintree.” The Telegraph. Np, 26 March 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.

Malcolm, David. Understanding Ian McEwan. Columbia, SC: U of South Carolina P, 2002.

McEwan, Ian. Amsterdam. London: Vintage, 1999.

---. “An Interview with Ian McEwan.” Bold Type. [n.d.] Web. 2 June. 2012.

McLachlan, Shelley, and Peter Golding. “Tabloidization in the British Press: A Quantitative Investigation into Changes in British Newspapers, 1952-1997.” Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards. Colin Sparks and John Tulloch, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.

Örnebring, Henrik, and Anna Maria Jönsson. “Tabloid Journalism and the Public Sphere: A Historical Perspective on Tabloid Journalism.” Journalism Studies 5.3 (2004): 283-295. Web. 14 Jan. 2012.

Pritchard, William H. “New York Times Book Review”. 27 Dec. 1998: 4. Web. 5 Dec. 2011.

Rooney, Dick. “Thirty Years of Competition in the British Tabloid Press: The Mirror and the The Sun 1968-1998.” Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards. Colin Sparks and John Tulloch, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.

Sparks, Colin, and John Tulloch. “Talking about the Tabloids: Journalists’ Views.” Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards. Colin Sparks and John Tulloch, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.

Storey, John. “Becoming British.” The Cambridge Companion to Modern British Culture. Ed. Michael Higgins, Clarissa Smith and John Storey. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010.

Tsai, Jen-chieh. “Question of Reception Ethics: Amity and Animosity in Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam.” Intergrams 12.1 (2011) Web. 30 April 2012.

Walkowitz, Rebecca L. “Ian McEwan.” Companion to British and Irish Novel: 1945-2000. Ed. Brian Shaffer. London: Blackwell, 2004.

Wells, Lynn. “The Ethical Otherworld: Ian McEwan’s Fiction.” British Fiction Today. Ed. Philip Tew and Rod Mengham. London: Continuum, 2006.

Wilson, A.N. Our Times. London: Arrow Books, 2009.