Jane Austen’s Persuasion and the Creation of Balance in Gender Roles through Courtship and Marriage
Abstract
British society in the early nineteenth century saw several marked changes, especially those directly affecting the middle class. It was a time known widely for its social restrictions and rigid domestic doctrines, especially on the female gender. However, despite unbending social expectations, female writers of the period portrayed one of the strictest institutions of all, marriage, as a form of female empowerment against a dominating patriarchal world. Austen’s Persuasion puts into perspective changes in the values of society during her lifetime. More than just mirroring the society, Austen infuses her own ideals of courtship, domesticity and marriage in her work. By analysing the novel alongside the historical changes of the time, this paper argues that, in Persuasion, Austen disassociates women from the traditional idea of domesticity by distancing them from the realm of the hearth and by giving them greater say and decision over their future. She gives women qualities that were deemed to be “masculine.” Moreover, Austen draws the men in the novel closer to the domestic sphere and feminises their masculinity. By doing so, Austen creates the ideal heterosexual relationship. In order for a relationship to work, the lovers have to embrace both their masculine and feminine characteristics and a failure to do so will result in obvious and often reproachful flaws.References
Austen, Jane. Northanger Abbey. London: Penguin Popular Classic, 1994.
---. Persuasion. New York: Oxford UP, 2008.
---. Pride and Prejudice. London: Penguin Popular Classic, 1994.
Brodie, Laura Fairchild. “Society and the Superfluous Female: Jane Austen’s Treatment of Widowhood.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 34.4 (1994): 697-718. JSTOR. Web. 7 July 2010.
Brown, Lloyd W. “Jane Austen and the Feminist Tradition.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 28.3 (1973): 321-338. JSTOR. Web. 7 July 2010.
Butler, Marilyn. Jane Austen. New York: Oxford UP, 2007. Print.
Cecil, David. A Portrait of Jane Austen. New York: Hill and Wang, 1980.
Cohen, Monica F. “Persuading the Navy Home: Austen and Married Women’s Professional Property.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 29.3 (1996): 346-366. JSTOR. Web. 7 July 2010.
Copeland, Edward. “Fictions of Employment: Jane Austen and the Woman’s Novel.” Studies in Philology 85.1 (1988): 114-124. JSTOR. Web. 7 July 2010.
Davidoff, Leonore, and Catherine Hall. Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class 1780-1850. Revised ed. Oxon: Routledge, 2007.
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale UP, 2000.
Markovits, Stefanie. “Jane Austen and the Happy Fall.” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 47.4 (2007): 779-797. Project Muse. Web. 29 June 2010.
Marsh, Kelly A. “The Mother’s Unnarratable Pleasure and the Submerged Plot.” Narrative 17.1 (2009): 76-94. Project Muse. Web. 29 June 2010.
Murphy, Olivia. “From Pammydiddle to Persuasion: Jane Austen Rewriting Eighteenth-Century Literature.” Eighteenth-Century Life 32.2 (2008): 29-38. Project Muse. Web. 7 July 2010.
Newlin, George. Understanding Great Expectations. Westport: Greenwood, 2000.
Rohrbach, Emily. “Austen’s Later Subjects.” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 44.4 (2004): 737-752. Project Muse. Web. 29 June 2010.
Smith, Grahame. The Novel & Society: Defoe to George Eliot. London: Batsford Academic and Educational, 1984.
Sodeman, Melissa. “Domestic Mobility in Persuasion and Sandition.” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 45.4 (2005): 787-812. Project Muse. Web. 29 June 2010.
Tanner, Tony. Jane Austen. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Tate, Margaret Watkins. “Resources for Solitude: Proper Self-Sufficiency in Jane Austen.” Philosophy and Literature 31.2 (2007): 323-343. Project Muse. Web. 29 June 2010.
Young, Kay. “Feeling Embodied: Consciousness, Persuasion, and Jane Austen.” Narrative 11.1 (2003): 78-92. Project Muse. Web. 29 June 2010.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff.