Genre Analysis of Thesis and Dissertation Abstracts Written by Thai Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
Copyright by the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Photocopying is allowed for internal, non-commercial use only. Photocopying for other uses or for purposes other than indicated must be permitted in writing from the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
All views or conclusion are those of the authors of the articles and not necessarily those of the publisher or the editorial staff.References
Bhatia, V. K. Analysing Genre-Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman, 1993.
Cross, C., and C. Oppenheim. “A Genre Analysis of Scientific Abstracts.” Journal of Documentation 62.4 (2005): 428-46.
Fedrickson, Kirstin, and John Swales. “Competition and Discourse Community: Introductions from Nysvenska studier.” The Construction of Professional Discourse. Eds. Britt-Louise Gunnarsson-Per Linell-Bengt Nordberg, 1994. 9-22.
Giannoni, D. S. “Worlds of Gratitude: A Contrastive Study of Acknowledgement Texts in English and Italian Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 23 (2005): 1-31.
Hyland, K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Singapore: Pearson, 2000.
Kanoksilapatham, B. “Generic Structure of Research Article Abstracts in Sciences.” Journal of English Studies 4 (2009): 95-111.
---. “Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles.” English
for Specific Purposes 24 (2005): 269-92.
---. “Writing Research Article Abstracts in Engineering: Linguistic Perspective.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Well-Being (STISWB), July 23-24, 2009. Mahasarakham: Mahasarakham, 2009.
Martin, P. “A Genre Analysis of English and Spanish Research Paper Abstracts in Experimental Social Sciences.” English for Specific Purposes 22 (2003): 25-43.
Melander, B., J. M. Swales, and K. M. Fredrickson. “Journal Abstracts from Three Academic Fields in the United States and Sweden: National or Disciplinary Proclivities?” Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Ed. A. Duszak. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997. 251-72.
Pho, P. “Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology: a Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance.” Discourse Studies 10 (2008): 231-50.
Prabripoo, Saichon. “A Study of the Organization of Ph. D. Thesis Abstracts of Science Students at the Faculty of Science, Mahidol University.” Diss. Mahidol, 2009.
Salager-Meyer, F. “Discoursal Flaws in Medical English Abstracts: A Genre Analysis per Research and Text Type.” Text 10 (1990): 365-84.
---. “Hedges and Textual Communicative Functions in Medical English Written Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (1994): 149-70.
Samraj, B. “Disciplinary Variation in Abstracts: The Case of Wildlife Behaviour and Conservation Biology.” Academic Discourse. Ed. John Flowerdew. London: Pearson, 2002. 40-56.
Santos, M. “The Textual Organization of Research Paper Abstracts in Applied Linguistics.” Text 16.4 (1996): 481-99.
Swales, J. M. “Aspects of Article Introductions.” Aston ESP Research Report No. 1, Language Studies Unit, Aston in Birmingham, UK, 1981.
---. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990.
---. Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.
Taddio, A., et al. “Quality of Nonstructured and Structured Abstracts of Original Research Articles in British Medical Journal, The Canadian Medical Association Journal, and the Journal of the American Medical Association.” Canadian Medical Journal 150.10 (1994): 1611-15.