Re-Packaged and Re-Sold: Shakespeare as a Cultural Product An Academic Survey in Shakespeare and British Culture

Main Article Content

Poonperm Paitayawat

Abstract

This academic survey “Re-Packaged and Re-Sold: Shakespeare as a Cultural Product” is an attempt to posit non-literary Shakespeare in British culture in hope of answering the question: “What makes Shakespeare important?”. It seems not only to demystify the god-like status of Shakespeare but also to address the discursive cultural significance and insignificance of Shakespeare in contemporary British cultures as opposed to the intellectual importance of his works. The first part of the survey traces the development of the Bard and his cultural status from a quintessential theatre-poet, to the overrated object of idolatry, all of which influence how Shakespeare is perceived and understood in British culture after his demise. The development, as it is argued, owes much to the merging of two seemingly different traditions: theatrical and literary, both of which quote and re-quote, manipulate and appropriate Shakespeare. The second part of the survey discusses the more contemporary institutionalisation of Shakespeare since the inauguration of the Royal Shakespeare Company in 1961, whilst taking into account the changing, more diverse notion of British cultures that Shakespeare and his works are defined against. It also addresses the rampant commercialisation of Shakespeare and the noticeable growth of the Shakespearean tourist industry both in Stratford-upon-Avon and London. Re-packaged, Shakespeare survives as a product that befits every era, and his popularity becomes instrumental in defining and re-defining “British Culture”.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Poonperm Paitayawat

Poonperm Paitayawat is currently undertaking a PhD research in Shakespeare in British theatre at Royal Holloway, University of London. He holds two Masters Degrees (with Merit): one in Shakespeare Studies (Birmingham) and the other in British Theatre Culture (Royal Holloway, London). He is also a freelance UK-based contemporary art and fashion journalist and food blogger.

References

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures: Second Edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.

Bennett, Susan. Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the

Contemporary Performance. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.

Bhaba, Homi K. The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.

Billington, Michael. Review of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Dir. Peter Hall. The Guardian. 11 December 1975.

Blayney, Peter. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington: Folger

Shakespeare Lib, 1991.

Chambers, Colin. Inside the Royal Shakespeare Company. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

Dobson, Michael. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995.

Elsom, John and Nicholas Tomalin. The History of the National Theatre. London: Trinity Press, 1978.

Elsom, John. Is Shakespeare Still Our Contemporary? London and New York: Routledge, 1989.

Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.

Findlater, Richard. “The Winding Road to King’s Reach”. The National: The Theatre and its Work 1963–1997. London: Nick Hern Books, 1997. p.79-83.

Harvie, Jen. Staging the UK. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 2005.

Hindess, Barry. Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 1995.

Holderness, Graham. Cultural Shakespeare. Hatfield: U of Hertfordshire P, 2001.

Kruger, Loren. The National Stage: Theatre and Cultural Legitimation in England, France, and America. Chicago and London: U of Chicago P, 1992.

Lawrence, Robert. Restoration Plays. London: Everyman, 1994. Print.

Miller, John. The Glorious Revolution: Second Edition. London:

Longman, 1997.

Nicoll, Allardyce. A History of English Drama, 1660–1900 – Vol.1: Restoration Drama, 1660–1700: Fourth Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977.

Orgel, Stephen. “The Desire and Pursuit of the Whole.” Shakespearean Quarterly, 58 (3), p. 290–310.

Review of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Dir. Peter Hall. What’s On. 19 December 1975.

Senter, Al. ‘Overcooking the Hamlet’. Review of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Dir. Richard Eyre. Evening Standard. 16 March 1989.

Shank, Theodore. “The Multiplicity of British Theatre”. Contemporary British Theatre, ed. Theodore Shank. London: Macmillan Press, 1994. p. 3–18.

Shaughnessy, Robert. “On Location.” A Companion to Shakespeare and Performance. Hodgdon, Barbara and W. B. Worthen, ed. Oxford:

Blackwell Publishing, 2005, p. 79–100.

Shaughnessy, Robert. Representing Shakespeare: England, History and the RSC. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.

Shellard, Dominic. British Theatre since the War. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1999.

Shulman, Milton. Review of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Dir. Laurence Olivier. Evening Standard. 23 October 1963.

Smith, Laura Jane and Waterton, Emma. “‘The Envy of the World?’: Intangible Heritage in England.” Intangible Heritage: Key Issues in Cultural Heritage, ed.

Smith, Laura Jane and Natsuko Akagawa. “Introduction”. Laura Jane Smith and Natsuko Akagawa (eds), Intangible Heritage. London and New York: Routledge, 2008. P. 1–9.

Taylor, Gary. “Afterword: The Incredible Shrinking Bard”. Shakespeare and Appropriation, ed. Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer. London and New York: Routledge, 1999. p. 197–205.

Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present. New York: Hogarth, 1990.

Ware, Vron. Who Cares About Britishness? London: Arcadia Books, 2007.

Watson, Nicola. “Shakespeare on the Tourist Trail.” Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Popular Culture, ed. Robert Shaughnessy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. p. 199–226.

Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John and Montgomery, William. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. London: W. W. Norton, 1997.

Zemgulys, Andrea. Modernism and the Location of Literary Heritage.

Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008.