A Bibliometric Analysis of Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal (KAJ): Research and Trends
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the research trends published in Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal (KAJ) from 2013 to 2022 by analysing the most productive authors, affiliations, and most cited articles. This research employed bibliometric analysis methods, including performance analysis, which consists of displaying the number of articles published, authors with a large number of published works, and affiliations of the authors writing the most frequently published research. The VOSviewer was utilized to demonstrate the keyword co-occurrence science mapping and the Looker Studio was used to exhibit analysis and to visualize the results in the form of tables, diagrams, and graphs. According to the findings, there are 990 articles published from 2013 to 2022. There was a consistent increase in the number of publications each year. Analysis of the article data classified by the affiliations of the authors shows that authors from Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University and Silpakorn University Phetchaburi IT Campus published the most research articles. The highest number of citations was found in 2014, with 79 citations among 56 articles. The authors are from four different countries: Thailand, Laos, Bangladesh, and China. Khon Kaen University's affiliate has contributed the most publications. Additionally, VOSviewer visualization also illustrates the data to exhibit 12 clusters of keyword co-occurrence, and the term “Livestock Production” remains one of the most important sectors, that are related world’s most important sectors concerning economy, food security, and the livelihoods of people.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกเรื่องที่ลงตีพิมพ์จะได้รับการตรวจอ่านโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ ความคิดเห็นและบทความที่ปรากฏในวารสารนี้ เป็นของผู้เขียนซึ่งมิใช่เป็นความคิดเห็นของคณะผู้จัดทำ และมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของสมาคมห้องสมุดแห่งประเทศไทยฯ การนำบทความในวารสารนี้ไปตีพิมพ์ซ้ำต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากคณะผู้จัดทำ
All articles submitted for publication will be reviewed by the academic reviewers. The editorial board and TLA claim no responsibility for the content or opinions expressed by the authors of individual articles or columns in this journal. Reprinting of any articles in this journal must be permitted by the editorial board.
References
Abdelwahab, S. I., Elhassan Taha, M. M., Moni, S. S. and Alsayegh, A. A. (2023). Bibliometric mapping of solid lipid nanoparticles research (2012-2022) using VOSviewer, Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices, 17, 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2023.100217.
Donthu. N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. and Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis:An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Hoque, M. Akash, Mondal, S. and Adusumilli, S. (2022). Chapter eighteen - Way forward for sustainable livestock sector, in Mondal, S. and Singh, R. L. (Eds.), Emerging Issues in Climate Smart Livestock Production. Academic Press, 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822265-2.00016-8
Hu, Y., Yang, S., Qian, X., Li, Z., Fan, Y., Manevski, K., Chen, Y. and Gao,W. (2023). Bibliometric network analysis of crop yield gap research over the past three decades. Agriculture,13(11), 2105-2105. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture 13112105
Li, M. and Zhang, Y. (2022). A bibliometric and visualization review analysis of agricultural ecosystem services research. Low Carbon Economy, 13(01), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2022.131003
Mao, G., Shi, T., Zhang, S., Crittenden, J., Guo, S. and Du, H. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of insights into soil remediation. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18(7), 2520-2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1932-4
Mnzava, E. and Chirwa, M. N. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Science (1998-2017). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2322.
Pan, X., Lv, J., Dyck, M. and He, H. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of soil nutrient research between 1992 and 2020. Agriculture, 11(3), 223-223. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030223
Sawangkul, S., Pinitpuwadol, W., Sakiyalak, D. and Choopong, P. (2020). Bibliometric differences between Scopus and Google Scholar for ophthalmology academics in Thailand: A comparative study. The Thai Journal of Ophthalmology, 34(1), 30-38. [In Thai]
Shah, S., M. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of international journal of agriculture sciences (2009-2014). Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(2), 151-157.
Thanuskodi, S. (2012). Bibliometric analysis of Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2(3), 170-175.
Umar, I. M., Mustafa, H., Lau, W. Y. and Sidek, S. (2022). Ninety-three years of agricultural accounting studies in Scopus journals: A bibliometric analysis from 1923 to 2020. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(5), 741-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-01-2021-0011
Uslu, T. U. and Acikel, B. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of academic publications on artificial intelligence and aviation keywords with VOSviewer.Journal of Aviation, 7(2), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1293740
Vargas, A. C., Espinoza-Mina, M., Alvarez, D. L. and Espinosa, J. N. (2022). Bibliometric software: The most commonly used in research. CEUR workshop proceedings, ICAIW 2022: Workshops at the 5th International Conference on Applied Informatics 2022, October 27-29, 2022, Arequipa, Peru. 47-65.
Zhang, F., Liu, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research trends in agricultural soil organic carbon mineralization from 2000 to 2022. Agriculture, 13(6), 1248-1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061248
Zupic, I. and Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods journal, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629