THE INFLUENCING FACTORS OF COLLEGE STUDENTS’ INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A CASE STUDY OF YUNNAN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of leadership and member exchange, self-efficac, and innovation behavior on college students' innovation behavior. The data sources of this study were 384 questionnaires distributed to college students of Yunnan College of Business Management. Through the analysis of structural equation model (SEM) , we find that the development relationship between teachers and college students affects the innovation behavior of college students. College students' self-efficacy, as a mediator, affects the relationship between independent and dependent variables, because it makes students feel capable of solving unknown problems when facing difficulties. It is worth noting that the relationship between teachers and students plays a positive role in innovative behavior, to pay particular attention to the relationship between teachers and students.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Adil, M. S., & Hamid, K. B. A. (2017). Impact of Individual Feelings of
Energy on Creative Work Involvement: A Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(1), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704105
Alexander, L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in Pursuit of Radical
Innovation: A Goal Orientation Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0044
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands
affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.901
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral
Change. Psychological Review, 48(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable
Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Vol.51(No.6), 1173–1182.
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A Dialectic
Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
Chen, A., Li, L., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Dong, L. (2013). Study on Innovation
Capability of College Students Based on Extenics and Theory of Creativity. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 1194–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.152
Chen, I.-S., & Chen, J.-K. (2012). Creativity strategy selection for the higher
education system. Quality & Quantity, 46(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9411-z
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The Microfoundations
Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1007651
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation
Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016).
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative
self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029359
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for
business students (4. ed). Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinations of Innovative Behavior:
A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (2005). Two Routes to Influence: Integrating
Leader-Member Exchange and Social Network Perspectives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 505–535. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.505
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace:
Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
Sürücü, L., Maslakçi, A., & Sesen, H. (2022). Transformational leadership,
job performance, self-efficacy, and leader support: Testing a moderated mediation model. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-08-2021-0306
Wang, D., Gan, C., & Wu, C. (2016). LMX and employee voice: A moderated
mediation model of psychological empowerment and role clarity. Personnel Review, 45(3), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2014-0255.
Wei, Y., Zhao, N., & Ge, L. (2023). The research on the cultivation of college
students’ innovation ability based on academic competition. SHS Web of Conferences, 166, 01024. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316601024.
Yang, P., Gao, Y., & Li, X. (2024). The Effect of Supportive Mentoring Style
on Innovative Behavior of Master’s Degree Students: Evidence from China. SAGE Open, 14(1), 21582440241233049. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241233049.