Subjectivity and Agency Debates in Feminist and Contemporary Religious Studies

Main Article Content

Anusorn Unno

Article Details

How to Cite
Unno, A. (2021). Subjectivity and Agency: Debates in Feminist and Contemporary Religious Studies. Journal of Anthropology, Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (JASAC), 4(1), 195–202. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jasac/article/view/249603
Section
Review Article

References

Anusorn Unno, 2018. “We Love Mr King.”: Malay Muslims of Southern Thailand in the Wake of the Unrest. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Foucault, M. 1985. The Use of the Pleasure. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Foucault, M. 1988. “An Aesthetics of Existence,” in Lawrence Kritzman (ed.), Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977-1984. London: Routledge.

Frisk, S. 2009. Submitting to God: Women and Islam in Urban Malaysia. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

Griffith, M. R. 2000. God’s Daughters: Evangelical Women and the Power of Submission. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CL: University of California Press.

Mack, P. 2003. “Religion, feminism, and the problem of agency: reflections on eighteen-century Quakerism”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29(1).

Mahmood, S. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

McNay, L. 2000. Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Ong, A. 2003. Buddha is Hiding: Refugees, Citizenship, the New America. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CL: University of California Press.