The Academic Leadership Model for Basic School Administrators in the Lower Northeast
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were (1) to determine the component of academic leadership for basic school administrators in the lower northeast, and (2) to propose the academic leadership model for basic school administrators in the lower northeast. The research design was mixed method, include qualitative and quantitative research. The sample group of this research were persons who involved in academic administration of basic school in the lower northeast, totaling 365 that computed from G*Power software and derived from multi-stage random sampling technique. The instruments used for collecting data were data record note, in-dept interview form and 5-level rating scale questionnaire. The statistics used for data analysis were descriptive statistics and the Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Research results revealed that (1) the component of academic leadership for basic school administrators in the lower northeast, there were 3 main components and 13 indicators. These include defining the school mission with 2 indicators, curriculum management with 4 indicators, and enhancing the learning atmosphere with 7 indicators. and (2) the developed model of the academic leadership for basic school administrators in the lower northeast was very good fit with the empirical data, the value of Relative Chi-square (χ2/df) = 1.89, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.96, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.93, Tucker Levis Index (TLI) = 0.99, Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) = 0.02, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05, all in line with specified criteria. And the key factors had the weight between 0.93- 0.99, higher than 0.70. The key components in order are curriculum management with the highest model predictive power at up to 98.00%, enhancing the learning atmosphere with the 94.90% and school mission with 86.20%.
Article Details
References
ธีระ รุญเจริญ. (2560). การบริหารโรงเรียนยุคปฏิรูปการศึกษา. กรุงเทพมหานคร: เอ็กซเปอร์เน็ท.
ปรียาพร วงศ์อนุตรโรจน์. (2553). การนิเทศการสอน. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ศูนย์สื่อเสริมกรุงเทพ.
เมตตา สอนเสนา. (2557). ภาวะผู้นำทางการเรียนการสอนของผู้บริหารสถานศึกษาที่ส่งผลต่อ แรงจูงใจในการปฏิบัติงานของครูในโรงเรียน สังกัดสานักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษา มัธยมศึกษา เขต 25. วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต. บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย: มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาแห่งชาติ. (2542). พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ.2542. กรุงเทพมหานคร: พริกหวาน.
Alig-Mielcarek, Jana M. & Hoy, W. K. (2005). A Thoeretical and Empirical Analysis of The Nature, Meaning, and Influence of Instructional Leadership: The Ohio State University. Online.Retrieved from http://72.14.235.104/search?q= cache:P2iwpAZ4GawJ:www. coe.ohio-state.edu.
Browne, M.W. and R. Cudeck . (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit, in Testing Structural Equation Models, ed. K.A. Bollen and Long. S., Newbury Park CA: Sage, p.136-162.
Davis, G.A. & Thomas, M.A. (1989). Effective Schools and Effective Teachers. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can. California ; Corwin Press.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P. & Ross Gordon, J. M. (2007). Supervision and Supervision and Curriculum Development. Instructional Leadership : A Developmental Approach (7th Ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international. (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
Hallinger, P.,& Darren, A. B. (2013). Synthesis of findings from 15 years of educational reform in Thailand: lessons on leading educational change in East Asia. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 16 (4), 399-418. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2013.770076
Krug, S. (1993). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey : Prentice Hill.
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCier, M. H. (2003). A study of high school principals' instructional leadership behaviors as perceived by teachers in urban comprehensive and magnet high schools. from ProQuest Dis sertations & Theses Global
McEwan, E. K. (2003). 7 steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
UNESCO (2023). Concept note for the 2024/5 Global Education Monitoring Report on leadership and education . Global Education Monitoring Report Team [1111] ED/GEM/ MRT/2023/CN DOI : https://doi.org/10.54676/SUOE3951.