The Erosion of the Local Political Power Cycle and Good Governance
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic article analyzes the crisis of faith in grassroots democracy, eroded by the power cycles of influential networks and political families at the local level. Local governance, which should be the primary mechanism for promoting good governance and citizen participation, has been transformed into a tool for maintaining personal interests and perpetuating power through hereditary succession, systematically extending from the provincial level down to the village. This phenomenon reflects a distortion of the power structure, turning political positions into family businesses, with those behind the scenes manipulating decisions to benefit their cronies at the local administrative and legislative levels. There is evidence of abuse of power that violates the principles of transparency and accountability. Budget and development projects are controlled to align with the interests of kinship-based business groups. At the village level, some community leaders use their positions to accumulate illicit wealth through front-line activities to secure public funds and leverage economic influence through lending to control the masses and monopolize votes. Upon termination of their terms, positions are passed on to spouses or relatives to create a barrier against scrutiny and perpetuate the cycle of benefits. The resulting impact severely undermines genuine local development, as public resources are used in inefficient projects that fail to meet the actual needs of the people. Furthermore, it erodes the spirit of democracy, leading to despair and submission among local residents. This article therefore proposes reform approaches through the creation of independent external oversight mechanisms, the modification of project evaluation methods to focus on quality of life outcomes rather than activities, and the improvement of laws regarding applicant qualifications to prevent nepotism and the monopolization of power by kinship-based networks. The aim is to restore good governance and return transparent and fair self-governance to Thai society sustainably.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
@ 2020 King Prajadhipok's Institute The Government Complex Commemorating All Right Reserved.
References
Chankote, P., Srisuwan, P, & Pattanagulchai, V. (2025). Rupbaep Kan Wat Kanborihan Ngan Wichakan Tam Lak Thon Ramaphi Ban Khong Sathan Suksa Nai Yu Khodi Chi Than [Measurement Models for Academic Administration Based on Good Governance Principles in Educational Institutions in the Digital Age]. Academic Journal, 8(2), 363-384. (In Thai)
Chanruang C. (2006). Karok Ra Cha Yaam Na Cho Thithae Ching Pen Yangrai [What does True Decentralization Look Like?]. Prachathai. (In Thai)
Chimphliwat, K. (2025). Kanprayukchai Lak Nititham Lae Thon Ramaphi Ban Phua Kanphatthana Witthayalai Chumchon Yang Yangyun [Applying the Rule of Law and Good Governance for the Sustainable Development of Community Colleges]. Journal of Social Development Studies, 8(1), 60-73. (In Thai)
Chutiang, C., Saiboonchuen, S., Chitbun, C., & Wongwattanapong, K. (2023).
Karok Ra Cha Yaam Na Cho Su Thongthin Phaitai Krabuan That Kan Pokkhrong Thongthin Samai Mai [Decentralization to Local Authorities Under the Modern Local Governance Paradigm]. Journal of Business Administration and Social Sciences Review, 6(4), 297-308. (In Thai)
Isariyannont, M. (2025). Bot Samruat Sathana Khong Phu Nam Radap Tambon Kap Khwampen Phonlamuang Nai Rabop Prachathipatai [A Survey of the Status of Village-level Leaders and Citizenship in a Democratic System]. Ramkhamhaeng Journal of Public Administration, 8(1), 51-82. (In Thai)
Karavekphan, B. et al. (2017). Kanchatkan Phak Rat Næo Mai [New Government Management] . King Prajadhipok Institute. (In Thai)
Phra Maha Suphachai Yanatheero (Namkaew), & Srilah, K. (2024). Sanya Chai Khong Phu Rai Amnat : Pracha Niyom Kap Kan Luaktang [The Pledge of the Powerless: Populism and Elections]. Rattanabut Academic Journal, 5(1), 708-725. (In Thai)
Phuripinisanan, T. (2022). Karok Ra Cha Yaam Na Boka Raphat Na Thongthin Khong Ongkon Pokkhrong Suan Thongthin Thai [Decentralization and Local Development by Thai Local Administrative Organizations]. Journal of Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Pali Studies, Buddhaghosaparidassana, 8(1), 85-100. (In Thai)
Pijanan, P. (2025). Thon Ramaphi Ban Kap Kankaekhai Panha Khorap Chan Nai Rabop Ratchakan Thai [Good Governance and Addressing Corruption in the Thai Civil Service]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Innovation Review, 8(4),
-278. (In Thai)
Thinbangtiao, O. (2022). Khrongsang Amnat Læ Kanmuang Khong Kan Luaktang Samachik Sapha Thetsaban Læ Nayokthetsamontri Nai Changwat Chon Buri Songphanharoihoksipsi [The Power Structure and Political Landscape of the Municipal Council and Mayoral Elections in Chonburi Province, 2021]. Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, Khon Kaen University, 7(2), 19-46. (In Thai)
Uwanno, B. (2003). Thon Ramaphi Ban Nai Ongkon Itsara. [Good Governance in Independent Organizations]. King Prajadhipok Institute. (In Thai)
Wongburanawat C. (1998). Kanborihan Ratchakan Thai [Thai public administration]. Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University. (In Thai)
World Bank. (1992). Governance and Development. World Bank.
Yanyongkasemsuk, R. (2021). Khwampen Phonlamuang khong Phu Nam Ongkon Phak Pracha Sangkhom [Citizenship of Leaders in Civil Society Organizations. Eastern Political Economy Journal, 5(2), 1-26. (In Thai)