Legal Measures against Misinformation and Disinformation on the Internet
Keywords:
Legal Measures, Misinformation, DisinformationAbstract
The article titled “Legal Measures against Misinformation and Disinformation on the Internet” aims to study existing legal measures and the necessity for improving or developing new measures to address the issue of misinformation and disinformation proliferating. Given the vast and varied sources of false and misleading information circulating on the Internet, which can originate from both direct human creation and automated systems often designed to appear credible and difficult to distinguish from genuine information, this study underscores the urgency of effective legal responses. This study reveals that the current legal measures, such as the Computer Crime Act B.E. 2550 (2007) and its amendment to the Computer Crime Act B.E. 2560 (2017) but in Section 3 lack a clear definition of “Misinformation” and “Disinformation” while Section 14, which serves as a key provision outlining offenses related to the unlawful input of computer data into a computer system, remains ambiguous. This ambiguity results in interpretations heavily dependent on the discretion of officials, potentially leading to unfair enforcement that fails to comprehensively address the current issues. This study aims to comparatively analyze relevant laws addressing misinformation and disinformation in both Thailand and other countries, to establish a framework for appropriately updating and developing laws that align with the current conditions of Thai society and the international context. Therefore, it is essential to have appropriate and effective legal measures to control and manage false and misleading information on the internet to maintain the credibility and security of information, protect the rights and interests of internet users, and ensure that any actions
References
คณพล จันทน์หอม. (2567). คำอธิบายกฎหมายอาญา ภาคความผิด เล่ม 2. กรุงเทพฯ : วิญญูชน.
เดือนเด่น นาคสีหราช. (2567). สรุปหลักกฎหมายลักษณะละเมิด จัดการงานนอกสั่ง ลาภมิควรได้ (ฉบับพร้อมสอบ). กรุงเทพฯ : วิญญูชน.
สราวุธ ปิติยาศักดิ์. (2567). คำอธิบายพระราชบัญญัติว่าด้วยการกระทำความผิดเกี่ยวกับคอมพิวเตอร์ พ.ศ. 2550 และ (ฉบับที่ 2) พ.ศ. 2560. กรุงเทพฯ : นิติธรรม.
ศูนย์ต่อต้านข่าวปลอม ประเทศไทย, คู่มือการใช้งานสำหรับประชาชน 2567.
Balandin, V. I. (2021). About the basis and limits of criminalization of public spread of knowingly false information in the media and telecommunication networks. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 15 (3). from https://doi.org/10.18255/1996-5648-2021-3-398-407
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. (2022). How to Identify Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation (ITSAP.00.300). from https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/how-identify-misinformation-disinformation-and-malinformation-itsap00300
Chan, Gary K. Y. (2022). ONLINE FALSEHOODS, CONSTITUTIONAL FREE SPEECH AND ITS LIMITS The Online Citizen v Attorney-General, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. from https://law.nus.edu.sg/sjls/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2024/07/2366-2022-sjls-mar-166.pdf
Committee to Protect Journalists. (2022). UNDERSTANDING THE LAWS RELATING TO “FAKE NEWS” IN RUSSIA. from https://cpj.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Guide-to-Understanding-the-Laws-Relating-to-Fake-News-in-Russia.pdf
Duguay, Stefanie, Burgess, Jean, and Suzor, Nicolas. (2020). Queer women’s experiences of patchwork platform governance on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Convergence, 26 (2), from https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518781530
Fallis, Don. (2015). What Is Disinformation?. Library Trends, 63. from https://doi.org/10.1353/LIB.2015.0014
Fessler, Daniel M. T., Pisor, Anne C., and Navarrete, Carlos David. (2014). Negatively-Biased credulity and the cultural evolution of beliefs. PLoS ONE, 9. from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095167
Firth, Joseph, Torous, John, Stubbs, Brendon, Firth, Josh A., Steiner, Genevieve Z., Smith, Lee, Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario, Gleeson, John, Vancampfort, Davy, Armitage, C., and Sarris, Jerome (2019). The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18. from https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
Gesley, Jenny. (2022). Germany: Administrative Court of Cologne Grants Google and Facebook Interim Relief; Holds Network Enforcement Act Partially Violates EU Law. from https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2022-03-30/germany-administrative-court-of-cologne-grants-google-and-facebook-interim-relief-holds-network-enforcement-act-partially-violates-eu-law/
Gesley, Jenny. (2022). Germany: Federal Constitutional Court Rules on Social Media Infringement of Politicians’ Personality Rights. from https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2022-02-22/germany-federal-constitutional-court-rules-on-social-media-infringement-of-politicians-personality-rights/
Gorwa, Robert. (2021). Elections, Institutions, and the Regulatory Politics of Platform Governance: The Case of the German NetzDG. Telecommunications Policy. from https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102145
Han, Kirsten. (2019). Big Brother’s regional ripple effect: Singapore’s recent “fake news” law which gives ministers the right to ban content they do not like, may encourage other regimes in south-east Asia to follow suit. Index on Censorship, 48. from https://doi.org/10.1177/0306422019858296
Hay, Bruce L., and Spier, Kathryn E. (1997). Burdens of proof in civil litigation: An economic perspective. The Journal of Legal Studies, 26. from https://doi.org/10.1086/468002
Heldt, Amélie. (2019). Reading between the lines and the numbers: an analysis of the first NetzDG reports. Internet Policy Rev., 8. from https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1398
Johnson, Jeffrey. (2022). Reasonable Person Standard: Legal Definition & Examples. from https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/personal-injury/reasonable-person-standard/
Kasakowskij, Thomas, Fürst, J., Fischer, Julia, and Fietkiewicz, Kaja J. (2020). Network enforcement as denunciation endorsement? A critical study on legal enforcement in social media. Telematics Informatics, 46. from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101317
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Meleu, Mathieu. (2001). Separation of powers and development. Journal of Development Economics, 64. from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00127-9
Serhan, Yasmeen. (2018). Macron’s War on Fake News. from https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/01/macrons-war-on-fake-news/549788/
Singapore Business Review. (2019). 4.83 Million Singaporeans Are Now Online. Singapore Business Review. from https://sbr.com.sg/information-technology/news/483-million-singaporeans-are-now-online
The Moscow Times. (2023). Russia Jails Anti-War Journalist 6 Years for “Fake News.”. from https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/02/15/russia-jails-anti-war-journalist-6-years-for-fake-news-a80230
The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General and another appeal and other matters [2021] SGCA 96
Vosoughi, Soroush, Roy, Deb, and Aral, Sinan. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359. from https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Wischmeyer, Thomas. (2020). What is illegal offline is also illegal online: the German Network Enforcement Act 2017. Social Science Research Network. from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976688.00012
Zurth, Patrick. (2021). The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? – Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability. SSRN Electronic Journal. from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668804
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SONGKLANAKARIN LAW JOURNAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in an article published in SLJ belongs to SLJ. SLJ has the right to publish, reproduce, or a collection of articles published already. Editor in chief and editorial team do not agree with the author's opinions.