THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEXT-BASED-LEARNING WITH ARGUMENTATION FOR PROMOTING STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY IN NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT FOR TENTH GRADE STUDENTS การพัฒนาแนวทางการจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้บริบทเป็นฐานร่วมกับการโต้แย้ง เพื่อส่งเสริมการรู้สิ่งแวดล้อม เรื่อง ทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อม สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 4

Main Article Content

Suthee Ponlamas
Sureeporn Sawangmek

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate how to use context-based-learning with argumentation for promoting students’ environmental literacy in natural resources and environment and to study the effect of promoting environmental literacy after using context-based-learning with argumentation. The action research was applied. Data was collected from 30 students of grade 10. Research instruments consisted of 1) three learning management plans in natural resources and environment, 2) reflecting form of learning management, 3) evaluation form of environmental literacy, and 4) worksheet reflected environmental literacy. The findings showed that learning management by context-based-learning with argumentation for promoting students’ environmental literacy in natural resources and environment should start with engaging using students’ local environmental issues, problem understanding for identification of stakeholders and asking questions about relationship between cause and effect, inquiring and presenting of information from various and reliable sources, arguing for the best way of solution under the classroom agreement, and public presenting and reflecting of the solutions by students who are part of community and society. Additionally, students’ environment literacy increases from medium level (56.67 points) to high level (83.75 points).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ponlamas, S. ., & Sawangmek, S. . (2020). THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEXT-BASED-LEARNING WITH ARGUMENTATION FOR PROMOTING STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY IN NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT FOR TENTH GRADE STUDENTS: การพัฒนาแนวทางการจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้บริบทเป็นฐานร่วมกับการโต้แย้ง เพื่อส่งเสริมการรู้สิ่งแวดล้อม เรื่อง ทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อม สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 4. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION NARESUAN UNIVERSITY, 23(3), 315–327. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/240794
Section
Research Articles

References

Ampai, S. (2015). The development of environmental literacy scale for lower secondary school students (Master thesis). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Arthman, J., & Monroe, M. (2004). The effect of environmental-based education on students’ critical thinking skills and disposition toward critical thinking. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 507-522.

Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: the salters’ approach. International Journal of Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999-1015.

Chareonwongsak, K. (2002). Analytical thinking. Bangkok: Success Media. [in Thai]

De jong, O. (2006). Making chemistry meaningful: Conditions for successful context-based teaching. IV Jornadas Internacionales, 17(4e), 215-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2006.4e.66010

De Jong, O., & Taber, K. S. (2014). Handbook of research on science education, chapter: The many faces of high school chemistry. New York: Routledge.

Easton, P. (2014). Sustaining literacy in Africa: Developing a literate environment. Paris: the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural.

Funk, C., & Kennedy, B. (2016). Everyday environmentalism. Pew Research Center. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/everyday-environmentalism/

Haruehansawasin, S. (2019). Scaffolding in problem-based learning for vocational learner. Vocational Education Innovation and Research Journal, 3(1), 65-75. [in Thai]

Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.

Ilhami, A., Riandi, R., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Implementation of science learning with local wisdom approach toward environmental literacy. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1157(2), 1-5.

Khemmani, T. (2012) Science of teaching: Effective learning management. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]

Khotrakul, S. (2016). Educational psychology. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]

Mahapol, N. (1990). International environmental problems. In Thai Encyclopedia for Youth by His Majesty the King, Volume 15 (12th ed.). Bangkok: Thai Encyclopedia Project for Youth. [in Thai]

Martin, A. (2018). Environment and technology risk the world should worry about in 2018. Zurich Insurance. Retrieved March 31, 2018, from https://www.zurich.com/en/knowledge/articles/2018/01/environment-and-technology-risks-the-world-should-worry-about-in-2018

NAAEE. (2011). Environmental literacy framework. Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://naaee.org/our-work/programs/environmental-literacy-framework

Namdej, N. (2014). Self-directed learning. Dental Nurse Journal, 25(2), 27-38. [in Thai]

Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2017). The environmental situation in the country. Journal of Environmental Quality Situation, 1(2). 1-7. [in Thai]

Phanyosri, P., & Chuchart, A. (2016). Effects of socio-scientific issues-based learning on environmental literacy of lower secondary school students. An Online Journal of Education, 11(2), 336-350. [in Thai]

Phua, M. P. E., & Tan, A. L. (2018). Promoting productive argumentation through students’ questions. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(4), 1-24.

Ritjaroon, P. (2014). Project assessment techniques. Bangkok: House of Kermyst. [in Thai]

Sirithon, N., & Jantarakantee, E. (2562). Implementing argument-driven inquiry approach for developing grade 10th students’ ability in making scientific explanation in the topic of force, mass, and law of motion. Silpakorn University Journal, 39(1), 130-141. [in Thai]

Sirited, P., & Thammaseeha, N. (2019). Self-efficacy theory and self-healthcare behavior of the elderly. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses, 20(2), 58-65. [in Thai]

Taconis, R., Brok, P., & Pilot, A. (2016). Teachers creating context-based learning environments in science. Sense: Rotterdam, Netherland.

Thanapud, A., Pitiporntapin, S., & Jantrarotai, P. (2015). Development of grade 10th students’ argumentation skills in natural resources unit using socioscienctific issues - based teaching. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies) Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2). 14-24. [in Thai]

Ultay, N., & Calik, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal science education technology, 2012(21), 686–701.

Walker, P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561-596.

World Economic Forum. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitveness-report-2018

Yu, K., Fan, S., & Lin, K. (2015). Enhancing students’ problem-solving skills through context-based learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1377-1401. DOI:10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4

Most read articles by the same author(s)