THE EFFECTS OF USING BLENDED LEARNING PROGRAM ON LEARNING ENGAGEMENT OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ผลของการจัดการเรียนการสอนด้วยวิธีการเรียนรู้แบบผสมผสานที่มีต่อระดับการยึดมั่นผูกพันในการเรียนของนิสิตระดับปริญญาตรี
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this quasi experimental study had been to compare effects of blended learning on learning engagement of undergraduate students. Participants were 375 undergraduate students (male 37.6%, female 62.4%) from Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University who enrolled in 2759151 Foundation Psychology for Education. Research instruments contained a blended learning program and a learning engagement questionnaire. Data were analyzed by a dependent sample t – test. Findings have revealed that blended learning program can enhance students affective engagement, t(232) = -2.841, p = .005, behavioral engagement, t(232) = -3.993, p = .000, and overall learning engagement, t(232) = -2.310, p = .022. However, there is no statistics significantly different between pretest and posttest scores of cognitive engagement of students.
Article Details
The owner of the article does not copy or violate any of its copyright. If any copyright infringement occurs or prosecution, in any case, the Editorial Board is not involved in all the rights to the owner of the article to be performed.
References
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees, online education in the United States, 2005. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/sur-vey/growing_by_degrees_2005
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
Avendano, J. (2003). Student involvement: Assessing student satisfaction, gains, and quality of effort (No. AAT 3115177). Bloomington: Illinois State University. (Proquest Digital Dissertations)
Bowchamchoy, K., & Kamhaengkit, R. (2019). Learning achievement from blended learning in information searching and academic writing of undergraduate students at Princess of Naradhiwas University. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 66-77. [in Thai]
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1-24.
Charbonneau-Gowdy, P., & Chavez, J. (2019). 3-M model for uncovering the impact of multi-level identity issues on learners’ social interactive engagement online. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(2), 131-143.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student engagement in blended learning environments with lecture-based and problem-based instructional approaches. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 310–322.
Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Zabukovšek, S. S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500-1515.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), The Search Institute series on developmentally attentive community and society. What do children need to flourish: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19
Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471.
Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction - the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
He, W., & Zhao, L. (2020). Exploring undergraduates' learning engagement via BYOD in the blended learning classroom (EULEBYODBLC). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 159-164.
Henrie, C., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K., & Graham, C. (2015). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131–155.
Hui, Y. K., Li, C., Qian, S., & Kwok, L. F. (2019). Learning engagement via promoting situational interest in a blended learning environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 408-425.
Innum, W. (2018). Enhancing undergraduate student engagement using autonomy support program (Master thesis). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Johnson, J. (2003). Distance education: The complete guide to design, delivery, and improvement. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14(47), 1-7.
Kristine, C. M., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Lisa, R. H. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning setting using experience sampling and strutural eqation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 21-33.
Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 21-33.
Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement online: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114. 10.1002/aehe.20018
Norberg, A., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A time based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207-216. DOI: 10.1108/10748121111163913
Poon, J. (2012). Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and engagement in property education. Property Management, 30(2), 129-156.
Sanusi, N. M., Kamalrudin, M., & Mohtar, S. (2019). Student engagement using learning management system in computer science education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2-11), 743-747.
Sasinan, S. (2018). Effect of the blended learning for enhancing attitudes and among achievement of future teachers towards inclusive education. Journal of Research Methodology, 7(2), 92-106. [in Thai]
Sirithadakunlaphat, S. (2018). Effect of the blended learning for enhancing attitudes and among achievement of future teachers towards inclusive education. Journal of Research and Development in Special Education, 7(2), 92-106. [in Thai]
Suwannatthachote, P., & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2018). Blended learning: Strategies for a connected and active classroom (Handout). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Ed.), The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of General Psychology (pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum Press.
Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Speck, B. W. (2000). Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.