SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION TECHNIQUES FOR MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES RESEARCH EMPHASIZING SEM

Main Article Content

Rungson Chomeya
Sombat Tayraukham
Sakesan Tongkhambanchong
Natthapot Saravitee

Abstract

The most frequently asked question concerning sampling for multivariate behavioral sciences research is, "What sample size do researcher need?" The answer to this question is influenced by a number of factors, including the purpose of the study, population size, analysis technique, error, the risk of selecting a "bad" sample size, and the sample size for estimate error. Interested readers may obtain a more detailed discussion of the purpose of the study and population size in Sampling. This paper reviews criteria for specifying a sample size for multivariate behavioral sciences research and presents several strategies for determining the sample size for multivariate behavioral sciences research. The conclusion of this article proposes a method for determining the appropriate sample size for multivariate behavioral sciences research. It suggests the following guide: 50: very poor 100: poor 200: fair 300: good 500: very good 1000: excellent 1200: exceptional 1500: profound. Determining the appropriate the sample size for multivariate behavioral sciences research consisting of two conditions which are (1) The condition for the parameters of various statistical techniques such as EFA, CFA, SEM, MSEM, etc. and (2) The second is the condition of the population representative. The sample size must be sufficient for the generalized to the population. If considered through the first conditions, the researchers must consider the minimum sufficiency in the second condition.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chomeya, R., Tayraukham, S., Tongkhambanchong, S., & Saravitee, N. (2024). SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION TECHNIQUES FOR MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES RESEARCH EMPHASIZING SEM. Journal of Education and Innovation, 26(2), 438–447. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/270176
Section
Academic Articles

References

Ahn, C., Heo, M., & Zhang, S. (2015). Sample size calculations for clustered and longitudinal outcomes in clinical research. Taylor & Francis Group.

Barbu, A., & Zhu, S. C. (2020). Monte Carlo Methods. Springer Nature Singapore.

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004

Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294248

Berry, W. (2018). Understanding multivariate research a primer for beginning social scientists. Taylor and Francis Group.

Chomeya, R., Tayraukham, S., & Tongkhambanchong, S. (2022). Sample size determination techniques for structural equation modeling: SEM. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 28(2), 24-40.

Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2018). Methods in behavioral research. McGraw-Hill Education.

Denis, D. J. (2021). Applied univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics understanding statistics for social and natural scientists, with applications in SPSS and R. John Wiley & Sons.

Gravetter, F. J. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.

Hardle W. K., & Simar L. (2019). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (5th ed.). Springer International Publishing.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Hampshire, Cengage Learning EMEA.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Kieser, M. (2020). Methods and applications of sample size calculation and recalculation in clinical trials. Springer.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Li, M., Cai, L. A., Lehto, X. Y., & Huang, J. (2010). A missing link in understanding revisit intention - The role of motivation and image. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(4), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2010.481559

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., and Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, A. J. (2005). Applied multivariate research design and interpretation. SAGE Publications.

Mitchell, F. J. (2017). Monte Carlo simulation methods, assessment and applications. Nova Science Publishers.

Mills, S. D., Malcarne, V. L., Fox, R. S., & Sadler, G. R. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the brief acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hispanic journal of behavioral sciences, 36(2), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986314526

Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8

National Institute of Health [NIH]. (2021). About behavioral and social sciences research. National Institute of Health. https://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/research-training/about-obssr.pdf.

Peng, C., & Kim, Y. G. (2014). Application of the stimuli-organism-response (SOR) framework to online shopping behavior. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3-4), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.944437

Privitera, G. J. (2016). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2016). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

Soper, D. S. (2023). Structural equation model sample size calculator. https://www.analyticscalculators.com/calculator.aspx?id=89.

Soper, D. S. (2023b). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models. http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (International ed.). Pearson.

Teo, T., & Van Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the intention to use technology by preservice teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.581892

Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Structural equation modelling application for research and practice (With Amos and R). Springer Nature.

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237