A FACTOR ANALYSIS OF LEARNING ECOSYSTEM FOR PROMOTING LIFELONG LEARNING IN SCHOOL UNDER THE SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to analyze the confirmatory factor analysis of learning ecosystem for promoting lifelong learning in school under the Secondary Education Service Area Office. The research instrument used was a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, with a content validity index ranging from 0.80 to 1.00, and a reliability coefficient of 0.97. The study involved a sample group of 342 school administrators from the Secondary Education Service Area Office, selected through stratified random sampling. The statistical methods used for data analysis included mean, standard deviation, correlation coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis. The study finding showed that the components of learning ecosystem for promoting lifelong learning in school under the secondary educational service area office comprised of components with 52 indicators as follows 1) Personnel (11 indicators) 2) Technology (8 indicators) 3) Curriculum Design (8 indicators) 4) Network Cooperation (9 indicators) 5) Resource Management (8 indicators) and 6) Operational Strategy (8 indicators). As a result of model testing, it was consistent with the empirical data, by considering Relative Chi-square/df = 1.8238, CFI = 0.998, TLI = 0.994, SRMR = 0.010, and RMSEA = 0.049. The standardized component loadings for each factor ranged from 0.837 to 0.939. All of which were statistically significant at the .01 level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The owner of the article does not copy or violate any of its copyright. If any copyright infringement occurs or prosecution, in any case, the Editorial Board is not involved in all the rights to the owner of the article to be performed.
References
Aumdonkloy, S. (2016). The role of school administrators in the 21st century. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 7(1), 1–7.
DiMartino, L. (2018). The role of school leaders in creating a learning ecosystem through school-community partnership. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/education_dissertations/141
García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. Retrieved June 13, 2024, from https://www.researchgate.net
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Juicharern, A. (2019). Learning ecosystem. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://www.posttoday.com/economy/news /578269
Office of the Education Council. (2021). An examination of the conditions for organizing an effective learning environment in the Thai context. Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
Office of the Education Council. (2023). A study report on the development of a learning ecosystem model that supports the development of the potential of Thai people 4.0. Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
Phra Wisutthiphongmethee, Phrakru Wirojkanchanakhet, Phrakru Wilardkanchanadhamma (Lek Sudhammapañño), & Phramaha Boonruang Siripunyo (Kaewla). (2021). Learning Ecosystem using New Normal Active Administrative Innovation in Thai Society. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 2517-2524.
Thanachawengsakul, N., & Wannapiroon, P. (2021). Development of a learning ecosystem using digital knowledge engineering through MOOCs knowledge repository system. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 11(1), 35–48.
