“ROLE MODEL FROM QUEEN BEE” THE GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF LGBTQIAN+ GOVERNMENT TEACHERS

Main Article Content

Yuttana Khuntawiti
Wanwisa Suebnusorn Klaijumlang
Prompilai Buasuwan

Abstract

This research aimed to explore the self-conduct of exemplary government teachers who are perceived as queen bee (the LGBTQIAN+ Government teachers who have successfully established themselves as respected figures and role models within the bureaucratic system) and to investigate appropriate expressions of identity among LGBTQIAN+ government teachers leading to acceptance and recognition within their organizations. The findings revealed that the way these individuals conduct themselves is shaped by the level of openness to diversity within their organizational context. In organizations that demonstrate limited openness to diversity, queen bees rely on intrinsic motivation and support from those around them. They create personal spaces for encouragement, engage in continuous self-development, adapt to varying circumstances and persevere through challenges. They view obstacles as opportunities for growth, prove their competence through tangible achievements and welcome constructive feedback. By focusing on their responsibilities and enduring difficulties with patience and determination, they not only overcome adversity but also showcase their ability to thrive in restrictive environments. On the other hand, in more inclusive organizational contexts, however, queen bees are able to use their unique identities as tools to foster acceptance and understanding of diversity. They leverage their individuality and charm to create positive working environments and cultivate enjoyable learning atmospheres. Through fostering strong interpersonal relationships, demonstrating sincerity and authenticity, promoting understanding of diverse perspectives, inspire collaboration and inclusivity. Furthermore, they utilize their talents, skills and personal experiences to enhance their teaching practices, thereby inspiring students and contributing to professional excellence. Regardless of the organizational context, however, the self-conduct emphasized by all queen bees encompasses four core principles: (1) expressing their identities in an appropriate manner, (2) performing their duties with professionalism, (3) fostering positive relationships within the organization and (4) serving as exemplary role models for their students. Furthermore, the research identified specific guidelines for appropriate identity expression among LGBTQIAN+ government teachers. These guidelines emphasize aligning identity expression with the three established professional standards for teachers: (1) standards of professional knowledge and experience, (2) standards of professional practice and (3) standards of professional conduct (ethical codes). By adhering to these standards, these teachers can effectively fulfill their professional responsibilities while demonstrating the compatibility of their unique identities with their roles as educators.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khuntawiti, Y., Suebnusorn Klaijumlang, W. ., & Buasuwan, P. . (2025). “ROLE MODEL FROM QUEEN BEE” THE GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF LGBTQIAN+ GOVERNMENT TEACHERS. Journal of Education and Innovation, 27(3), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.71185/jeiejournals.v27i3.280850
Section
Research Articles

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association.

Ariyasal, S. (2018). Motivation on operation of personnel in basic school under the office. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 3(2), 45–57.

Boonwas, N. (2021). Development of homosexual people through the change of Western context history. SAU Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 5(1), 112–125.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Emerson, M. R. (1976). Social exchange theory. In J. Blau (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (Vol. 2, pp. 335–362). University of Washington Press.

Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

Jackson, P. A. (2000). An explosion of Thai identities: Global queering and reimagining queer theory. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2(4), 405–424. DOI: 10.1080/13691050050174422

Kulick, D. (1998). Language and desire: Encoding sex, romance, and intimacy. Routledge.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Leary, M. R. (2010). Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging: The pursuit of interpersonal connection. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (5th ed., pp. 864–897). John Wiley & Sons.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Office of the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Civil Service Commission. (2024). Work & life. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from https://webportal.bangkok.go.th.

Poedloknimit, C. (2019). Gender diversity in public organizations (Independent study, Academic Association on the Political Science and Public Administration, Thailand). Academic Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, 5(2), 45–60.

Siripatcharanan, L., Chirinang, P., Chaisakunkiat, U., & Chandarasorn, V. (2023). Motivating employees in the organization for modern management (Doctoral thesis, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand). Journal of Administrative and Management Innovation, 6(1), 88–102.

Sirisuvanno, P., & Thongdee, V. (2023). Development teachers to become professional teachers in the 21st century. Journal of MCU Ubon Review, 4(2), 77–91.

Suesat, W., & Sirasoonthorn, P. (2007). Medical discourse kathoey in Thai society (Doctoral dissertation). Phitsanulok: Naresuan University.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.

Thai Government Gazette. (2013). The three professional standards for teachers [Digital media]. Retrieved January 3, 2025, from https://elibrary.ksp.or.th.

Tharonparit, J., & Nanthachai, S. (2023). Desirable image toward teaching professional standards for gender diversity teachers. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 5(3), 120–134.

The Hues Global Justice Collective. (2013). The Safe Zone Project. Retrieved December 30, 2024, from https://thesafezoneproject.com.

Winter, S. (2006). Thai transgenders in focus: Demographic profile and perceived social attitudes. International Journal of Transgenderism, 9(2), 47–62. DOI: 10.1300/J485v09n01_03