Moral Drama in the Digital Platform Era: The Case of “Kathoey Moral Drama” and the Logic of Its Popularity in Contemporary Thai Society

Main Article Content

Taisith Kruasom

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of “Kathoey Moral Drama” as a hybrid narrative type that combines moral drama with LGBTQ+ representation on Thai digital platforms. It asks why this type of content has gained widespread popularity and what such popularity reveals about social values and the boundaries of sexual diversity acceptance in contemporary Thai society. The study employs conceptual analysis and literature synthesis drawing from cultural studies, platform studies, and gender and sexuality studies. The analysis suggests that moral drama in the platform era should be understood as “platformed moral narrative,” in which moral storytelling is compressed, accelerated, and reformatted to fit the attention economy. Within this context, Kathoey Moral Drama functions as a hybrid narrative that inserts kathoei characters into conventional moral frameworks. This incorporation enables visibility while simultaneously reproducing conditional acceptance, whereby sexual diversity is recognized only when aligned with dominant moral expectations rather than grounded in rights-based equality. The article contributes to scholarship by demonstrating how narrative forms and platform logics jointly shape the politics of representation. It further argues that Thai digital media culture is characterized by a paradoxical condition of representational expansion alongside structural continuity.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kruasom, T. (2026). Moral Drama in the Digital Platform Era: The Case of “Kathoey Moral Drama” and the Logic of Its Popularity in Contemporary Thai Society. Journal of Man and Society, 12(1), e292030. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/husocjournal/article/view/292030
Section
Academic Article

References

Aguero, E. R., & Cingolani, M. (2018). Dissenting narrations about motherhood experiences: A reading from the feminist point of view of personal writings that circulate in digital platforms. Estudos em Comunicação, 1(27), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.20287/ec.n27.v1.a08

Chan, L. S., Tan, J., & Cassidy, E. (2023). Queer cultures in digital Asia: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2455–2462. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21105/4120

Chao, S.-Y., Chunsaengchan, P., & Chaochuti, T. (2025). Viewer viewership and queer imag(in)ing: Thai soap opera Shadow of Love and boys’ love media. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 13(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2024.7

Chojnicka, J. (2024). Transitioning (on the) internet: Shifting challenges and contradictions of ethics of studying online gender transition narratives. Qualitative Sociology Review, 20(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.20.1.05

Chotirosseranee, S., & Pongpanit, A. (2024). Thai film archive and early Thai queer cinema. In S. K. Y. Leung & M. Khoo (Eds.), The Routledge companion to Asian cinemas (pp. 529–539). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003266952-59

Das, S., & Farber, R. (2020). User-generated online queer media and the politics of queer visibility. Sociology Compass, 14(9), e12824. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12824

Duangwises, N., & Jackson, P. A. (2021). A homoerotic history of Bangkok’s gay middle class: Thai gay bars and magazines in the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of the Siam Society, 109(2), 59–77. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pub_jss/article/view/252150

Duguay, S., Burgess, J., & Suzor, N. (2020). Queer women’s experiences of patchwork platform governance on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Convergence, 26(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518781530

Fikejzová, M., & Charvát, M. (2022). Who’s the ‘real’ transgender? The representation and stereotyping of the transgender community on YouTube. Res Rhetorica, 9(2), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2022.2.1

Griffin, H. (2024). Sexual diversity and streaming television: Toward a platform studies approach to analyzing LGBTQ+ TV. Convergence, 30(4), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241265508

Hall, S. (1977). Culture, the media and the “ideological effect.” In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp. 315–348). Edward Arnold.

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson University Library.

Inpim, C. (2024). Kathoey mothers: Experiences of transgender women becoming a mother under the capitalist patriarchy in Thai society. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3), 947–956. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.3.24

Jalli, N. (2025). Viral justice: TikTok activism, misinformation, and the fight for social change in Southeast Asia. Social Media & Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251318122

Käng, D. B. (2012). Kathoey “in trend”: Emergent genderscapes, national anxieties and the re-signification of male-bodied effeminacy in Thailand. Asian Studies Review, 36(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2012.741043

Kijratanakoson, N. (2023). Journalistic role performance of the Thai press on the issue of transgender rights. International Journal of Communication, 17, 1232–1254. file:///C:/Users/HUMAN/Downloads/ojsadmin,+20220-66111-10-ED.pdf

Kirdnark, T. (2025). Paid to live my own life: Trans women influencers, self-governance, and platformization of creative works in Thailand. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 28(6), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779251336476

Lim, J. B. Y. (2025). Digital media interventions in Southeast Asia: A decolonial perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78211-4

Metaveevinij, V. (2022). Asian youth and resistance in transnational media. In S. Rajaratnam & R. Lee (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Asian transnationalism (pp. 406–415). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003152149-37

Millette, M., & Maillard, A. (2023). Quelles (re)productions de normes identitaires dans YouTube? Étude de chaînes LGBTQIA+ au Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, 48(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjc.2022-0009

Myles, D., Duguay, S., & Echaiz, L. F. (2023). Mapping the social implications of platform algorithms for LGBTQ+ communities. Journal of Digital Social Research, 5(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v5i4.162

Newman, P. A., Reid, L., Tepjan, S., & Akkakanjanasupar, P. (2021). LGBT+ inclusion and human rights in Thailand: A scoping review of the literature. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1816. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11798-2

Nukul, C. (2025). The third sex: Beyond a gender binary in Thai culture and films. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b22586

Ocha, W. (2023). Buddhism, gender, and sexualities: Queer spiritualities in Thailand. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 42(5), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-01-2020-0025

Peterson-Salahuddin, C. (2025). Teachable moments: TikTok social drama as a site of Black feminist intellectual production. Information, Communication & Society, 28(3), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2388093

Rauchberg, J. S. (2022). #SHADOWBANNED: Queer, trans, and disabled creator responses to algorithmic oppression on TikTok. In LGBTQ Digital Cultures: A Global Perspective (pp. 196–209). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196457-15

Rodriguez, J. A. (2023). LGBTQ incorporated: YouTube and the management of diversity. Journal of Homosexuality, 70(9), 1807–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2022.2042664

Sender, K. (2025). The queer vanguard: How television streaming platforms promoted intersectional LGBTQ+ content to establish their brands. Journal of Communication, 75(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae049

Shuttleworth, C. (2023). Talking sex: Thai phet and its connection to Thai drag performance as reflected by the language of kathoey performers in Chiang Mai. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 23(3), 618–632. https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2023.52

Singpliam, P. (2022). “Darling, beauty is pain”: Female empowerment, neoliberal rationality and class—A postfeminist analysis of This Is Me Vatanika. Manusya, 25, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-25010023

Sreejak, T. (2025). Beyond criminality: Unveiling the untold kathoey narratives in Thai-language news headlines. Sexuality & Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-025-10421-5

Wang, S., Wang, N.-C., & Lee, W.-C. (2026). Methodological and ethical considerations in LGBTQ-focused online ethnographic research: A systematic review and a human-centered framework. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251411167

Yue, A., & Lim, R. P. A. (2022). Digital sexual citizenship and LGBT young people’s platform use. International Communication Gazette, 84(4), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485221094115