The Results of the Learning Management Using the Steam-4-Innovator Model in Conjunction with the Board Game in Design Technology Course to Promote Creativity and Innovation Abilities for Mathayom 2 Students

Abstract

          The objectives of this research were 1) to study creativity and innovation ability after learning management by using the steam-4- innovator model in conjunction with board game  in Technology Design course to promote talent, creativity and innovation, 2) to investigate the students' satisfaction towards teaching and learning management by using the Steam-4- Innovator in conjunction with the board game in Technology Design course to promote creativity and innovation abilities for Mathayom 2 students. The sample groups were 21  Mathayom 2 students in the second semester of the academic year 2020 at Ban-lan-krabue School. The research instruments included 1) a learning management plan using a Stream-4- Innovators in conjunction with a board game in Technology Design course to promote creativity and innovation abilities for Mathayom 2 students,  2) the board game based on Stream-4-Innovator learning,  3) the creativity and innovation evaluation form after teaching and learning management using the Steam-4-Innovator model with board games,  4) the  innovative performance evaluation form after teaching and learning management by using the Steam-4-Innovator in conjunction with the board game in Technology Design course;  and;  5) a questionnaire after teaching and learning management by using steam4innovator model in conjunction with the board game in Technology Design course to promote creativity and innovation abilities for Mahayom 2 students. The statistics used were mean and  standard deviation.

The results of the research were as follows:

• Concerning the abilities in creativity and innovation of students when they were

learning by using the Steam-4-Innovator model in conjunction with the board games in Technology Design course, it was found that in overall the students’ abilities in creativity and innovation were at a . Very good level with  an average of 80.04 which was higher than the set criteria.

          2) From the evaluation of students’ innovative work, it was found that their innovations were at an average of 76.87 percent according to the quality criteria which was at a very good level. This was based on 75 percent of the assessment criteria set.  
          3) Concerning the students’ satisfaction, it was at the high level.