MEDIATING EFFECTS OF TEAM TRUST AND TEAM INTERACTIVE BEHAVIOR ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLEXIBLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION TEAM EFFECTIVENESS IN UNIVERSITIES IN GREATER BAY AREA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The objectives of this research were: (1) to study the components of team trust, team interactive behavior, flexible leadership and innovation team effectiveness. (2) to develop a model of mediating effects of team trust and team interactive behavior on the relationship between flexible leadership and innovation team effectiveness in universities, and (3) to verify the effect of team trust, team interactive behavior and flexible leadership effect on the innovation team effectiveness in Universities in Greater Bay Area. The population of this research were 4,883 teachers working in universities in the Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area, Republic of China. The sample was determined by G*power, total 539 teachers and were obtained by proportional stratified random sampling method. The statistical for data analysis includes Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling.
The research found that : (1) The flexible leadership was seven components include; Planning ability, Adaptability, guidance ability, control ability, caring ability, resilience ability and growth ability. The Innovation team effectiveness was three components include; innovation task performance, cooperation satisfaction and team growth. The team trust was two components include; cognitive trust and emotional trust, and the team interactive behavior was four components include; team support, team communication, team work and knowledge sharing; (2) The mediating effects of team trust and team interactive behavior on relationship between flexible leadership and innovation team effectiveness in the Greater Bay Area fit well with empirical data. And (3) Flexible leadership, Team trust and team innovative behavior had a positive effect on the innovation team effectiveness. In addition, the Flexible leadership could be positive indirect effect on team innovative effectiveness through team trust and team interactive behavior, which were as mediation effect. So, in organization should be promoting all of them togethers for innovation team effectiveness improvement.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Beerman, et al. (2009). Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. 112 (3), Gynecologic Oncology, 572–576.
Berlie, A. J. and Benard, M. (2023). Greater Bay Area Importance of Hongkong and Guangzhou. Open Access Library Journal, 10 (3), 1-18.
Costa, C, et al. (2001). Trust within teams : The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10 (3), 225–244.
Dirks, T. K. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (3), 445–455.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18 (1), 39-50.
Hannah, T, et al., (2009). A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (6), 897–919.
Hoch, J. E. and Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Shared Leadership in enterprise and Human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23 (1), 114-125.
Hosmer, T. L. (2009). The ethics of management. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1-55.
Lin and Yi Lingfeng. (2020). The Cross-level Effect of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Team Creativity. Foreign Economics & Management, 42 (9), 107–120.
Mayer, C., et al. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709–734.
Mayer, E. R. (2009). Multimedia learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds : An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. Applied psychology, 51 (3), 355-387.
Yukl and Mahsud, R. G. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal : Practice and Research, 62 (2), 81–93.
Zand, E. D. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (2), 229–239.
