Public Perspectives on Roles of Thai Government

Main Article Content

Thawilwadee Bureekul
Ratchawadee Sangmahamad
Suphunnika Termmee


This paper is the 2017 public opinion survey on the direction and role of Thai government. The purpose of the study was to measure the public opinion regarding the role of the government in Thailand and to explore the factors affecting trust in the government and the expectation of people on the responsibility of the government. This was a quantitative research study, which was conducted between 2017 of June and August. The research population included a sample of 1,459 Thai citizens over the age of 18 with voting rights. Moreover, the study utilized a questionnaire, using the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) on the Role of Government Module network, as a data collection method. The major research findings are that Individuals who were more highly educated, older, and those who considered them to be a higher level of corruption among government officers were found to explain lower levels of public trust in government offices. Furthermore, more highly educated individuals and those who considered there to be a higher level of corruption among politicians were found to be related to lower levels of public trust in politicians. The level of public trust in government offices had a significant effect on the first three roles of government to provide jobs for Thai citizens, support industry if they want to grow, and provide housing for the unemployed. Moreover, the level of public trust in politicians was found to significantly affect perceptions on gender equality support, provide housing for those who cannot find by themselves, and strict environmental laws enforcement. It can be concluded that if citizens trust government officers and politicians, they will expect better government performance. Thus, the government should support gender equality in Thailand. Additionally, the government should support jobs for the Thai people, offering financial support about education, and ensuring a decent quality of housing for the unemployed and solve the problem of low income students. Nonetheless, corruption is the most important issue for the government to rectify. The Thai government should resolve corruption among government officers and politicians by enhancing the rule and law, by establishing mechanisms to access information and enable transparency, and by increasing citizen participation in government decision making in order to decrease corruption and increase public trust.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bureekul ถ., Sangmahamad, R., & Termmee ส. (2021). Public Perspectives on Roles of Thai Government . King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal, 19(1), 5–27. Retrieved from
Research Articles


ถวิลวดี บุรีกุล และคณะ. (2563). บทบาทของรัฐบาลในสายตาของประชาชน. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันพระปกเกล้า.

สถาบันพระปกเกล้า. (2563). รายงานผลการสำรวจความคิดเห็นของประชาชนเกี่ยวกับความพึงพอใจต่อการบริการสาธารณะ และการทำงานของหน่วยงานต่างๆ พ.ศ. 2562 และสรุปผลการสำรวจ พ.ศ. 2546-2562. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันพระปกเกล้า.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร. (2560). ความมุ่งหมายและคำอธิบายประกอบรายมาตราของรัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย พุทธศักราช 2560. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักการพิมพ์ สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร.

Bechert, I., & Quandt, M. (2010). ISSP Data Report: Attitudes Towards the Role of Government. Cologne: Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.

Bell, D. V. (2002). The Role of Government in Advancing Corporate Sustainability. Vancouver: Environmental Futures Forum (EFF).

Curtice, J. & Harding, R. (2016). British Social Attitudes:the 34th Report: Role of government. London: NatCen social research.

Demirbas, D. & Demirbas, S. (2011). Role of the State in Developing Countries: Public Choice Versus Schumpeterian Approach. Business & Economics Research Journal, 2(1), 15-30.

Dunning, J. H. (1997). Governments and the Macro-Organization of Economic Activity: an Historical and Spatial Perspective. Review of International Political Economy, 4(1), 42-86.

Edlund, J. & Lindh, A. (2019). The ISSP 2016 Role of Government Module: Content, Coverage and History. International Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 99-109.

Friedman, M. (1955). The Role of Government in Education. New Jersey: Rutgers University Pres.

Gildenhuys, J. (1988). South African Public Administration: Past, Present and Future. Pinetown: Owen Burgess.

Grimwood, R. (2016). The Role of Government: Analysing Results from the 2016 Social Attitude Survey. Auckland: the University of Auckland.

Hasegawa, K., Shinohara, C. & Broadbent, J. P. (2007). The Effects of ‘Social Expectation’ on the Development of Civil Society in Japan. Journal of Civil Society, 3(2,) 179–203.

Horn, L., & Paslov, J. (2014). Trends in Student Financing of Undergraduate Education: Selected Years, 1995-96 to 2011-12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

ISSP Research Group. (2008). International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government IV - ISSP 2006. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4700 Data file Version 1.0.0. Retrieved from

James, O. (2011). Managing Citizen's Expectation of Public Service Performance; Evidence from Observation and Experimentation in Local Government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419-1435.

Jessop, B. (2015). The State: Past, Present and Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jung, Y. D. & Sung, S. Y. (2012). The Public’s Declining Trust in Government in Korea. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, 1(1), 36-38. Retreived from

Kharisma, B. & Pirmana, V. (2013). The Role of Government on Education Quality and its Provision: The Case of Public Junior Secondary School among Provinces in Indonesia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 37(2), 259-270.

Kim, H. R. (2018). A Cross-national Examination of Political Trust in Adolescence. The Effects of Adolescents’ Educational Expectations and Country’s Democratic Governance. Young Journal, 27(3), 245-278.

Kourula, A., Paukku, M., Peterman, A., & Koria, M. (2018). Intermediary Roles in Regulatory Programs: Toward a Role-Based Framework. Regulation & Governance, 13(2), 141-156.

Laitin, D. D. (2000). Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline. the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (pp. 1-43). Washington D.C.: Helen Milner and Ira Katznelson, eds.

OECD. (2013). Government at a Glance, Policy effectiveness and the Governance Agenda. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2016). Investing in Trust: Leveraging Instituions for Inclusive Policy Making. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2018). Understanding the Drivers of Trust in Government Institutions in Korea. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retreived from itemId=/content/component/9789264308992-6-en.

Onichakwe, C. C. (2016). The Role of Good Governance and Developmet Administration in National Developmemt. International Journal of Development and Management, 11(1), 176-186.

Pula, E. (2017). Determinants of Trust in Institutions in Kosovo: An Empirical Perspective. Prishtina: Legal and Political Studies.

Peck, S. & Gibson, R. (2000). Pushing the Revolution. Alternatives Journal, 26(1), 9-11.

Peters, B. G. (1996). Shouldn’t Row, Can’t Steer: What’s a Government to do?. Public Policy and Administration, 12(2), 51-52.

Rollston, C. A. (2018). Enemies and Friends of the State Ancient Prophecy in Context. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Slaughter, A. M. (2017). 3 Responsibilities Every Government has Towards its Citizens. Retrieved from

Tanny, T. F. (2019). Trust in Government: Factors Affecting Public Trust and Distrust. Jahangirnagar Journal of Administrative Studies, 12, 49-63.

Tang, N., Eisenberg, J. M. & Meyer, G. S. (2004). The Roles of Government in Improving Health Care Quality and Safety. Journal on Quality and Safety, 30, 47-55.

The world Bank. (1997). The State in a Changing World. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zhao, D. & Hu, W. (2015). Determinants of Public Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0(0), 1–20.

Most read articles by the same author(s)