THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACADAMIC ACHIEVEMENT BY USING STEAM TEACHING METHOD IN MATHEMATICS FOR GRADE 4
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The purposes of this research are: 1) Compare the academic achievement in mathematics of grade 4 students before and after using the STEAM teaching method. 2) Examine student satisfaction towards Instructions by using with the mathematics STEAM teaching method. Research instrument include: 1) six learning plans by using STEAM teaching method in mathematics with a total of 12 hours. 2) Tow technology achievement tests: before and after learning (Mathematics). 3) a questionnaire on Student's satisfaction on academic achievement in mathematics through STEAM. The data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation, t-test Dependent.
The research finding revealed that:
- Posttest learning by using STEAM teaching method in mathematics was higher than pretest learning at 0.05 level of significance. the average score before learning is 10.03, and the average score after learning is 21.73, with a full score of 30. The standard deviation (S.D.) of the pre-study scores was 4.60 and the standard deviation (S.D.) of the post-study scores was 4.32.
- The students were satisfied with the leaning by using STEAM teaching method in mathematics at the highest level(=4.65, S.D.= 36).
Article Details
References
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. et al. (1979).Cognitive Psychology and Instruction [J]. American Journal of Psychology, 92(3):562
Educ.Sci. 2021, 11(7),331; From:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Frykholm J, Glasson G. (2005). Connecting science and mathe- matics instruction: pedagogical context knowledge for teachers [ J ]. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3): 127-141.
Georgette Yakman，August 2012 Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education.
Herschbach, D. R. (2011).The Stem Initiative: Constraints and Challenges [J]. Journal of Stem Teacher Education, 48(1): 96-122
Lund University. Retrieved June 11, 2014,from http://www.5.lu.es/upload/Utvarderingsenheten / SSSintro. Pdf
Morrison, J. S. (2006). Attributes of Stem Education: The Students, the Academy, the Classroom[ED/OL].[2017-06-07].http:// www.tiesteach.org/assets/content/documents/Jans% 20pdf% 20Attri⁃ butes_of_STEM_Education-1.pdf.
Postema and markham. Retrieved November 22, 2012, from http://cerg.csse.monash.edu.au/reports/sat_1202.htm
R Steinmayr, A Meiǹer, AF Weideinger, L Wirthwein, 04 JUNE 2015, From https://www .researchgate .net/publication/351870823_Academic_Achievement
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, Stemma⁃ nia [J]. The Technology Teacher, 68(4): 20-26.
Smith. Retrieved June,11, 2014,from http://www.ehow.com/info_8572092freud-3-components-personality.htm
陈杰飞， 基于STEAM教育的小学科学拓展课程开发——以"覆杯实验"为例，实验教学与仪器，2017（7）
刘璐.基于STEAM教育理念的小学数学“综合与实践”的教学研究[D].华中师范大学,2019.
孙江山,吴永和,任友群.3D打印教育创新：创客空间、创新实验室和STEAM[J].现代远程教育研究，2015（4）：96.
王娟,吴永和.2016.“互联网+”时代STEAM教育应用的反思与创新路径.
王同聚.基于“创客空间”的创客教育推进策略与实践——以“智”创空间”开展中小学创客教育为例[J].中国电化教育,2016,(06):65—70+85.
余胜泉，胡翔 .STEM 教育理念与跨学科整合模式 [J]. 开放教育研究，2015，21（4）：13-22.
赵慧臣 、陆晓婷，开展STEAM教育，提高学生创新能力——访美国 STEAM教育知名学者格雷特·亚克门教授Open Education Research,Vo1.22.No.5.0ct.20l6.
周东岱， 樊雅琴 于颖， 等.基于 STEAM 教育理念的小学课程体系重构研究[J].电化教育研究2017( 8)