LIFE 5 TEXTBOOK EVALUATION BASED ON CONTENT LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL) MODEL
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study explores the application of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) model in evaluating the "Life 5" textbook published by National Geographic within the context of English Language Teaching (ELT) in China, where traditional methods have long been predominant. The primary objectives are to examine how the textbook aligns with the four domains of CLIL: Content, Language (Communication), Learning (Cognition), and Culture, and conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its content using CLIL principles. The study employs external and internal evaluations, utilizing checklists and tables to systematically assess the representation of the 4Cs domain in the textbook's instructions and activities. The findings indicate a varied distribution of 4Cs domains in the textbook's texts and activities, with culture and learning prominently represented. Content is primarily presented through pictures and articles, language through pair and group discussions, learning through analytical and creative tasks, and culture through diverse instructional activities. The analysis reveals that the "Life 5" textbook effectively integrates the 4C domains, offering a balanced and comprehensive language learning experience. Content-related instructions are consistently promoting academic language skill development. Language-focused activities vary significantly, enhancing oral communication and self-confidence. Learning domain texts are characterized by higher-order thinking and cognitive engagement, while the cultural domain fosters intercultural competence. The study concludes with several pedagogical implications: the need for balanced integration of the 4C domains in ELT materials, emphasis on practical language use, diverse learning strategies, promotion of intercultural understanding, and continuous evaluation and adaptation of teaching materials.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: Teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.3
Anderson, C. E., McDougald, J. S., & Cuesta Medina, L. (2015). CLIL for young learners. In D. Marsh & M. Laitinen (Eds.), CLIL for young learners: Some insights (pp. 15-30). CLIL Publishers.
Banegas, D. L., & Hemmi, C. (2021). Clil: Present and future. International Perspectives on CLIL, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_14
Bonces, J. A. R. (2019, November 9). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian context 1. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/33314950/Content_and_Language_Integrated_Learning_CLIL_Considerations_in_the_Colombian_Context_1
Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.001
Cambridge. (2019). TKT: Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Teaching Knowledge Test Handbook for teachers. (Teaching Knowledge Test) | Cambridge English. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/teaching-english/teaching-qualifications/tkt/
Cenoz, J. (2009). Towards multilingual education: Basque educational research from an international perspective.
Coyle, D. (n.d.). CLIL planning tools for teachers. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/85341173/CLIL-Planning-Tools-for-Teachers-Do-Coyle-Edited-Version
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2012). CLIL Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2007). How language works. Penguin Books.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Darn, S. (2006, January 10). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A European Overview. Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490775
Del Valle López, S. (2021). The CLIL approach and its implementations in ELT based on a case study in northern Spain. ELT Journal, 76(4), 423-431.
Fauzi, I. (2019). An Evaluation of EFL Textbooks Entitled “New Access English for Academic Purposes” for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(2), 89-100.
Fernández, R., & Halbach, A. (2011). Analysing teacher discourse in CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(3), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2010.488284
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson Longman
Hemmi, C., & Banegas, D. L. (2021). Clil: An overview. International Perspectives on CLIL, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_1
Hu, G. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 635-660. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588520
Hu, G. (2023). Sustaining content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in secondary education.
Hussain, S. S. (2022). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in ELT as a Link between Language Learning and Content Development. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 33-48.
Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of type of approach (CLIL versus EFL) and methodology (book-based Versus Project Work) on motivation. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria De Didáctica De Las Lenguas Extranjeras. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.53737
Lestari, S., & Setiyawan, R. (2020). Technology Era, Global English, CLIL: Influence and its Impact on English Teaching for Young Learners in Indonesia. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 284-294.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
López Medina, B. (2021). On the development of a CLIL textbook evaluation checklist. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 14(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2021.14.1.4
Marsh, D., & Maljers, A. (1994). Content and language integrated learning. Jyväskylä Finnish University Press.
Marsh, D. (2002). Clil/Emile: The european dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. UniCOM.
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. European Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-5.
McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in Elt: A teacher's guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
Okeeffe, L. (2013). A framework for textbook analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12785/irclr/020101
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
Romeu Peyró, M. C., Cerezo Herrero, E., & Llamas Pérez, E. (2020). Thinking skills in primary education: An analysis of CLIL textbooks in Spain.
Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria De Didáctica De Las Lenguas Extranjeras, (33), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26647
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., Sierra, J. M., & Gallardo del Puerto, F. (Eds.). (2011). Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts. Peter Lang.
Suwannoppharat, K., & Chinokul, S. (2015). Applying CLIL to English Language Teaching in Thailand: Issues and Challenges. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 57(224), 67-78.
Travica, M. (2022). Awareness and Use of CLIL in ELT in Lower Primary Education. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 177-196.
Waller, D. (n.d.). Investigation into the features of written discourse at levels B2 and ... https://uobrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10547/606056/repository%20version.pdf
Wang, W. (2013, August). Understanding and Explaining CLIL and CLIL in China. CNKI. https://oversea.cnki.net/
Weninger, C. (2018). Textbook analysis. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1489
Weninger, C. (2020). Multimodality in critical language textbook analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797083
Widodo, H. P. (2015). Textbook analysis on college academic writing. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 18(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v18i2/109-122
Widodo, H. P. (2007). Textbook analysis on college academic writing. Jurnal Bahasa Modern, 1(1), 21-30.
Xiaolin, X. (2018). CLIL in China—Drawbacks and Development Approaches. CNKI. https://chn.oversea.cnki.net