WORLD OUTLOOK TOWARDS THE ROLE OF SENNATORS THE CONSTIT OF KINNDOM OF THAILAND YEAR B.E. 2560 (2017) OF STUDENTS OF MAHAMAKUT BUDDHIST UNIVERSTTY LANNA CAMPUS

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: 1) to study the perspectives on the role of Members of Parliament 2) to investigate expectations regarding the responsibilities of Members of Parliament 3) to explore suggestions for addressing problems and directions for resolving issues related to the role of Members of Parliament as outlined in the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand in the year 2017. This study focused on students from Mahamakut Buddhist University, Lanna Campus. The sample group consisted of 224 students participating in supplementary classes at the university. The research utilized questionnaires and statistical analysis methods, including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, as well as focus group discussions. The findings from the data analysis are presented in tabular form for clarity.

The results of this research found that:

1. The perspective on the role of Members of Parliament was assessed to be at a moderate level across four aspects. Upon closer examination of the average scores for each aspect, ranked from highest to lowest, it is evident that the origin of parliament members received a moderate interpretation level with a score of = 3.21. The expectations of the general public were rated at = 3.22. Meanwhile, the role and duties as outlined in the Constitution received a score of = 3.07.
2. While expectations for the responsibilities of Members of Parliament included law scrutiny, their actions demonstrated more support for the government than for the Parliament itself. This phenomenon stemmed from their endorsement by the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), leading to a lack of political neutrality and disinterest in issues faced by the public, such as the high cost of goods. Furthermore, there appeared to be a lack of cohesion and connection with the people.
3. Recommendations: The research suggests that Members of the Senate should be directly elected by the populace, opposing their appointment by a select group of individuals. This approach ensures consideration of the people's hardships and fosters a stronger connection with the public.