THE CURRICULUM EVALUATION ON BACHELOR DEGREE OF EDUCATION PROGRAM IN MATHEMATICS (5-YEAR-ENGLISH PROGRAM) (NEW CURRICULUM 2014), VALAYA ALONGKORN RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY UNDER THE ROYAL PATRONAGE, PATHUM THANI PROVINCE

Authors

  • Gobgul Sungamullig Bachelor of Education Program in Mathematics Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathum Thani
  • Premjit Kajonpai-Lasen Bachelor of Education Program in Mathematics Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathum Thani
  • Chantanee Indrasuta Bachelor of Education Program in Mathematics Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathum Thani
  • Pimlak Moonpo Bachelor of Education Program in Mathematics Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathum Thani

Keywords:

Curriculum Evaluation, Bachelor Degree of Education (5-year-Curriculum), CIPP Model Evaluation Method

Abstract

          This research is the Curriculum Evaluation on Bachelor Degree of Education Program in Mathematics (5-year-English Program) of the Faculty of Education, Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathumtani Province. The aims of this research are: 1) to evaluate the Curriculum Evaluation on Bachelor Degree of Education Program in Mathematics (5-year-English Program) of the Faculty of Education, Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Pathumtani Province and 2) to study the desired characteristics of graduate students. The curriculum evaluation used CIPP MODEL in terms of context, input, process and product. The sample included 8 administers and instructors in this program, the 11 5th year undergraduate students, mathematics major and 31 teachers in elementary schools involved. The data were collected by content analysis, focus group and interview. The research instruments were questionnaire and interviews and the document check form. The qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis and group in categories. The quantitative data were analyzed by Excel and reported by mean and standard deviation and interpreted by Likert’s criteria.
          The research findings were as follows:
          1. The results of the context evaluation in terms of curriculum objectives, curriculum structure, and contents showed that they were rated at a high level for appropriateness.
          2. The results of the input evaluation in terms of instructors, students, and education support factors showed that they were rated at a high level, at a high level and at a medium level respectively for appropriateness.
          3. The results of the process evaluation in terms of instruction and internship in school showed that they were rated at a high level for appropriateness.
          4. The results of product evaluation in terms of ethics and morals, content knowledge, cognitive skills, numerical analysis, communication and technology skills, and instructional skill showed that they were rated at a high level for appropriateness. As for the relationship and responsibility, they were rated at the highest level for appropriateness.
          5. The results of desired characteristic evaluation in terms of ethics and morals, content knowledge, cognitive skills, relationship and responsibility showed that they were rated at the highest level for appropriateness. Concerning numerical analysis communication and technology skills, and instructional skill, they were rated at a high level for appropriateness.
          The focus group analysis suggested that the Curriculum Program in Mathematics (5-year-English Program) consisted of too many Mathematics courses and some of the contents of the courses overlap one another. There was a wide gap of differences in content between Mathematics in the University and Mathematics in schools. Therefore there should some changes such as adding the content of modern Mathematics in schools and the integration courses between mathematics content and instruction in schools.

References

กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2560). เกณฑ์มาตรฐานหลักสูตรระดับอุดมศึกษา พ.ศ. 2558 และเกณฑ์มาตรฐานที่เกี่ยวข้อง. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักมาตรฐานและประเมินผลอุดมศึกษา สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.

เบลลันกา, เจมส์ และแบรนต์, รอน. (บก.). (2554). ทักษะแห่งอนาคตใหม่: การศึกษาเพื่อศตวรรษที่ 21. (แปลจาก 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn โดย วรพจน์ วงศ์กิจรุ่งเรือง และอธิป จิตตฤกษ์). กรุงเทพฯ: โอเพ่นเวิลด์ส.

มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์. (2562). หลักสูตรครุศาสตรบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาคณิตศาสตร์ (4 ปี) หลักสูตรภาษาอังกฤษ หลักสูตรปรับปรุง พ.ศ. 2562. ปทุมธานี: คณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์.

อิศเรศ พิพัฒน์มงคลพร และคณะ. (2556). รายงานการวิจัยการประเมินหลักสูตร ศึกษาศาสตรบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาการประถมศึกษา คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร. นครปฐม: คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร.

อุดม คชินทร, สมบัติ นพรัตน์ และดิเรก พรสีมา. (2561). เปิดแนวคิดปรับหลักสูตรผลิตครู ทางเลือกใหม่สนองโลกศตวรรษที่ 21. ไทยรัฐ. [ออนไลน์], เข้าถึงได้จาก https://www.thairath.co.th/news/local/1405760. (2561, 5 มิถุนายน).

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development Theory and Practice. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Sucheera Phattharayuttawat, Jariya Chantra & Wilasinee Chaiyasit. (2009). An evaluation of the curriculum of a graduate programme in Clinical Psychology. [Online] Available: https://bit.ly/2JxZJn0. (2561, 17 January).

Stufflebeam, D. L., et al. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-Making. Itasca, Illinois: Peacock Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-27

How to Cite

Sungamullig, G., Kajonpai-Lasen, P., Indrasuta, C., & Moonpo, P. (2019). THE CURRICULUM EVALUATION ON BACHELOR DEGREE OF EDUCATION PROGRAM IN MATHEMATICS (5-YEAR-ENGLISH PROGRAM) (NEW CURRICULUM 2014), VALAYA ALONGKORN RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY UNDER THE ROYAL PATRONAGE, PATHUM THANI PROVINCE. Valaya Alongkorn Review, 9(3), 1–17. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/var/article/view/232700

Issue

Section

Research Article